Since the private sector in America has demolished the public domain, and since it has squandered all the cash at Wall Street and in off-shore investments, all the while bringing the nation into its appalling debt ridden state, the world's largest, which becomes the public's onus, I'm afraid those roads and bridges will have to wait, Scott SoCall. This means you are fighting a war that's both ridiculous and grotesque at once.
Railing against 5 people who have gotten a sweet deal, as they say, within the state's employment, while not seeing all the rest, is failing to establish a correct analysis of what's wrong.
As regards my typical workday, Scott SoCal, everyday your posts have shown me a totally uninteresting world that has progressively paralyzed my mind, a world in which life is basically not worth living, whereas, when I left your world, I have found people that have shown me the same world as one to be invariably interesting. Thus, from that moment I already had a choice between two worlds: yours, which I have always found uninteresting and merely tiresome, and theirs, which seemed packed with adventures and in which one could never be bored but wished to live forever, hoping that it would never end; the automatic consequence was that I wanted to live in this world perpetually, for all eternity. To put it simply, you always took everything as it came, whereas they never took anything as it came. From your birth you have lived by the laws laid down by your predecessors and never dreamed of making yourself new laws to live by, laws of your own, whereas they lived solely by their laws of their own, which they made themselves. And these self-made laws they were forever overturning. You followed a preordained path, and you never would have thought of deviating from it for a moment, but they went their own way.
To cite another difference between you and them, to bring things back to our respective workdays, Scott SoCall, you have always hated what you call idleness and could not imagine that a thinking person simply did not know what idleness was and could not afford it, that when a thinking person indulged in apparent idleness he was actually in a start of extreme tension and excitement. This was because yours was true idleness and you did not know what to do with it, for when you were idle there was actually nothing going on, as you were incapable of thinking, let alone in engaging in rigorous mental process. For the thinking person there is no such thing as idleness. Your idleness was of course a genuine idleness, for when you did nothing there was nothing going on in you. By contrast, one might say, the thinking person is at his most active when he is supposedly doing nothing. This is beyond the comprehension of genuinely idle people like yourself and people like yourself in general. Yet on the other hand, Scott SoCal, you probably do have an inkling of the nature of my idleness, and this is why you hate me, for you guessed that my idleness, being quite different from yours, not only could become dangerous, but always was dangerous. The thinking person who is idle appears as the greatest threat for those whom idleness means simply doing nothing, who actually do nothing when they are idle. You hate me because, in the nature of things, you can't despise me.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram