patricknd said:
frenchfry said:
The COP21 climate conference opens today in Paris. Lots of roads closed for the passage of the world leaders who arrive over the next few days - and who I assume will arrive by private/state planes and will use convoys of gas guzzling monster cars to make their entrance in accordance with their status and importance. Actual change of habits is for the peasants ... let them eat cake!
so much for telecommuting
Yeah, a teleconference would send a teeny signal that these people are actually serious, and at least take one argument out of the skeptics' arsenal. I really don't see why it's necessary for the attendees to be physically present. When I was beginning my scientific career, I wasn’t always that keen on going to conferences. People pointed out to me that it wasn’t just the seminars and talks, you meet others on a more informal basis, you learn about things that haven’t been published, you make new contacts and set yourself up to get advance notice of future unpublished information. I get all that, but I question how much that comes into play in a conference like this, and anyway, you can still do that electronically. In fact, you can do more of it. There is only so much information you can absorb in face to face time, whereas there is no limit to electronic information, that you can peruse long after the conference is over.
Nor should teleconferencing IMO be restricted to climate change gatherings. Did Hollande really have to fly to the U.S., Germany, Russia, etc.? Do world leaders in general really have to visit their allies? I understand it's important to meet face to face at some point, particularly for representatives of countries who have less than friendly relations, but once you've done it once or twice or three times, do further meetings like that actually promote better relations? I doubt it very much, I can in fact imagine situations when they would make relationships worse.
Anyway, to the extent that teleconferencing does make the meeting a little more difficult, that would be a good thing. The leaders would be showing the rest of the world that they, too, can make sacrifices.