- Nov 24, 2009
- 1,158
- 0
- 0
auscyclefan94 said:- He said sorry and Gesink is an adult as well. Saying h would of not won anyway is a idiotic arguement. It's not the point. It's like saying that if doper returned a positive test that he still would of won anyway.
I don't see the problem. How is claiming that Evans would have lost a sprint to Valverde an 'idiotic argument'? Most GC candidates would lose a sprint to Valverde, so I don't see why it would be so stupid to think that even if Evans had Gesink's position, he would have lost the sprint anyway. And it has nothing to do with being anti-Evans, but rather trying to weigh the facts in a plausible manner. I'd make the same claim that Evans would have lost to Valverde in the sprint, I think most people would.
And the youngest is right. Analogies aren't your strong point. Fighting for position in a sprint and comparing it to a premeditated and planned doping program as equivalent opportunities to cheat is actually quite stupid. There is a huge difference between intending to do something and doing something accidentally.
