• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

2017 Worlds BERGEN, NORWAY, RR ELITE, SUN 24th 277KM!

Page 35 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
It looks like Gaviria and Colombia fu,,,ed this race a big. If Pantano stayed with him till the last atacks and he just kept his nerves he could have easilly won here. As somebody said here befor: WC are for grown men.
QS is babysiting him too much.
 
Re:

Brullnux said:
Sanremo two years ago, a vuelta stage once, that Tour stage in which orica actually had a plan.It doesn't happen often but occasionally it does. He has beaten Kristoff regularly and Kristoff was centimetres away today, so it wasn't the wrong tactic. Just double standards

Okay, that's fine, but if you really think it through and start looking at percentage chance of winning, it's clear that Sagan in a sprint has a higher probability than Matthews in a sprint.

Sagan in a break was probably lower than Sagan in a sprint, since it was unlikely that the race wouldn't be decided in a sprint (though I must admit that I don't think Sagan had it in him to follow Alaphilippe today - his sickness was probably influencing him a bit).

The question is whether Matthews in a break also had a lower probablity than Matthews in a sprint? I'm not entirely sure about that.

But I'm not a bookmaker so I don't really know how this can be estimated correctly.

However, if we say that the probability of Sagan winning in the sprint was 55% and Matthews was 5%, the probability of the race ending in a sprint was 65%, and each had a 20% chance of winning from a break, the following numbers come up:

Sagan from sprint: 0.65*0.55 = 35.75%
Sagan from break: 0.35*0.2 = 7%

Matthews from sprint: 0.65*0.05 = 3.25%
Matthews from break: 0.35*0.2 = 7%

If my numbers aren't completely off (which they may be), this shows why it would be better for Matthews to try something other than the sprint and why Sagan relying on the sprint would be the better idea. This interpretation depends on an assumption that the probability of winning from a sprint was approximately zero if the rider had tried to go for it in a break.

I admit that this is based on a LOT of guess-work, so my post may be pure BS, without that being the intention, though.
 
Thank you for defending clean cycling NOT. Moscon should be banned for life. Period!
franic said:
Echoes said:
Ever since I've been following cycling (28 years now), such action has always been tolerated after a crash...
Same here. It was maybe the most ridiculous DQ I have ever seen in my life. Given that Moscon had the legs to attack Gilbert I wonder how difficult it would have been to catch the group drafting behind cars...
 
Mar 1, 2017
39
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

franic said:
Popchu said:
Billie said:
http://sporza.be/cm/sporza/matchcenter/mc_wielrennen/Comp_WK_wielrennen-2017/1.3065384

Heli Video of the final 5 kms. Attacks by Swift, Lutsenko, Gilbert and Cort with Gaviria, Sagan and later Bettiol closing mostly all down.
Moscon closed the gap with Alaphilippe?

And Gaviria, why did he all those attacks? He could've won it. :Neutral:
If he did Alaphilippe threw away a gold attacking on cobbles. He could have definitely reached the finish line with Moscon and outsprinted him
funny that a potential Paris roubaix winner is dropped on the cobbles
 
cineteq said:
Thank you for defending clean cycling NOT. Moscon should be banned for life. Period!
franic said:
Echoes said:
Ever since I've been following cycling (28 years now), such action has always been tolerated after a crash...
Same here. It was maybe the most ridiculous DQ I have ever seen in my life. Given that Moscon had the legs to attack Gilbert I wonder how difficult it would have been to catch the group drafting behind cars...

Along with Nibali and Barguil and all the others pinged for hanging onto a car?
 
Mar 1, 2017
39
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

franic said:
Richeypen said:
Dr. Watson said:

If you get DSQ'd for that you should also be gone for sticky bottles.
You should DQ half of the pelotoN. It's very annoying to have this type of useless FairPlay about uninfluential stuff just for the sake of having an argument. This is something I miss about the good old days when nobody would have even mentioned the fact.
without this help he would not have been there in the end. Deserved DSQ
 
I can't tell. Haven't seen those races. I just remember Boonen paced by the Mr Bookmaker car after a puncture at the 2004 E3 Harelbeke. I remember Bernard Thévenet explicitly said that it was tolerated on France TV a long time ago. I remember Voeckler on an edition of the Tour of Lombardy while not even having bad luck.

Had Moscon not crashed he would have been up there.
 
Why am I feeling personally disappointed by this? (Denmark's failure at the end)

But just imagine if they'd actually pulled it off, how perfectly balanced it would have been: Norway got an elite (male) road racing European champion on Danish soil, then Denmark could've gotten an elite (male) road racing world champion on Norwegian soil.
 
Re:

RedheadDane said:
Why am I feeling personally disappointed by this? (Denmark's failure at the end)

But just imagine if they'd actually pulled it off, how perfectly balanced it would have been: Norway got an elite (male) road racing European champion on Danish soil, then Denmark could've gotten an elite (male) road racing world champion on Norwegian soil.

https://twitter.com/CyclingHubTV/status/912018053927489539

After seeing this footage, I must admit that I think Cort made a very good move. If it hadn't been for Bettiol's presence in the group, he (Cort) would have become World Champion. It was really disorganised when he went for it.
 
Yes, any problem with that? Don't have double standards like you do!
Inquitus said:
cineteq said:
Thank you for defending clean cycling NOT. Moscon should be banned for life. Period!
franic said:
Echoes said:
Ever since I've been following cycling (28 years now), such action has always been tolerated after a crash...
Same here. It was maybe the most ridiculous DQ I have ever seen in my life. Given that Moscon had the legs to attack Gilbert I wonder how difficult it would have been to catch the group drafting behind cars...

Along with Nibali and Barguil and all the others pinged for hanging onto a car?
 
Echoes said:
I can't tell. Haven't seen those races. I just remember Boonen paced by the Mr Bookmaker car after a puncture at the 2004 E3 Harelbeke. I remember Bernard Thévenet explicitly said that it was tolerated on France TV a long time ago. I remember Voeckler on an edition of the Tour of Lombardy while not even having bad luck.

Had Moscon not crashed he would have been up there.
Will you be so tolerant, when Sagan crash next time and use this kind of sticky bottle? FOR SURE YES. :D
 
Re: Re:

tobydawq said:
RedheadDane said:
Why am I feeling personally disappointed by this? (Denmark's failure at the end)

But just imagine if they'd actually pulled it off, how perfectly balanced it would have been: Norway got an elite (male) road racing European champion on Danish soil, then Denmark could've gotten an elite (male) road racing world champion on Norwegian soil.

https://twitter.com/CyclingHubTV/status/912018053927489539

After seeing this footage, I must admit that I think Cort made a very good move. If it hadn't been for Bettiol's presence in the group, he (Cort) would have become World Champion. It was really disorganised when he went for it.

Sure, it looked pretty good for a while there.
And now I can't help but wonder what might've been if it had been Valgren or Kragh who'd attacked, and Cort who'd been lying in wait ready for the sprint.
Guess that's just how cycling is. A move can be both really clever; if it actually works, and really stupid; if it fails.
 
SKSemtex said:
Will you be so tolerant, when Sagan crash next time and use this kind of sticky bottle? FOR SURE YES. :D

I have never said anything about a rider that is not worth for another one, so stop it now. I'm coherent, I'm not a hypocrite. It's happened at the last Paris-Roubaix already but some among the Sagan fan community would rather see Van Avermaet doing it ...
 
Re: Re:

AQETUYIOI said:
tobydawq said:
If it hadn't been for Bettiol's presence in the group, he (Cort) would have become World Champion. It was really disorganised when he went for it.
Surely someone else would've reeled him in?

Who? All the sprinters were isolated. GvA had Gilbert, so perhaps him, but that is questionable. Gaviria had Urán but had just been in the break.

The only other nations with more than one rider were Russia, the Netherlands, France and Denmark but they either didn't have a sprinter, had Alaphilippe who had been in the front or were Denmark.
 
Hellyea said:
http://www.tv2.no/sport/9384804/

Missing footage from last 5km. All the salty Sagan haters should watch how he actually managed to work on the front and drastically helped to bridge the breakaway.
Can't get the right impression about speeds and level of fatigue from air, but looks like Moscon and Alaphilippe were within the reach of the chasers for some time before they've actuall beeny caught. It was just a matter of commitment. The rest of action looks equally confusing.
Experience played massive role, as already mentioned.
 
Re: Re:

tobydawq said:
Who? All the sprinters were isolated. GvA had Gilbert, so perhaps him, but that is questionable. Gaviria had Urán but had just been in the break.

The only other nations with more than one rider were Russia, the Netherlands, France and Denmark but they either didn't have a sprinter, had Alaphilippe who had been in the front or were Denmark.
Anyone, including Kristoff, Sagan, Matthews, Swift, Trentin etc!
 
Echoes said:
SKSemtex said:
Will you be so tolerant, when Sagan crash next time and use this kind of sticky bottle? FOR SURE YES. :D

I have never said anything about a rider that is not worth for another one, so stop it now. I'm coherent, I'm not a hypocrite. It's happened at the last Paris-Roubaix already but some among the Sagan fan community would rather see Van Avermaet doing it ...

It's a funny coherence that which antagonises riders who use the slipstream of other riders but lauds those who freewheel by getting lifts by vehicles.

Apparently it all comes down to draft (big no-no) versus contact forces (be my guest). Who would have known?
 
Re: Re:

AQETUYIOI said:
tobydawq said:
Who? All the sprinters were isolated. GvA had Gilbert, so perhaps him, but that is questionable. Gaviria had Urán but had just been in the break.

The only other nations with more than one rider were Russia, the Netherlands, France and Denmark but they either didn't have a sprinter, had Alaphilippe who had been in the front or were Denmark.
Anyone, including Kristoff, Sagan, Matthews, Swift, Trentin etc!

Ha, I didn't even think of that :p

That is a good point but do you really believe they could/would have come to an agreement of cooperating with a kilometer remaining? I don't think that is even remotely realistic, although I agree that it would be the best thing to do in order to remain in contention.
 
Hellyea said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaJGAboivHk

Missing footage from last 5km. All the salty Sagan haters should watch how he actually managed to work on the front and drastically helped to bridge the breakaway.

aaargh, he was just wheelsucking some guys trying to bridge

Now irony off, he did today what he needed to do. I have posted this earlier, but Sagan somehow gets his head straight for the WC. And has the correct amount of luck too. It seems like someone just wants him in that jersey and is pulling the strings :)

And the mayhem that has been spilt on his head after the race, one can only shake his head. On the both sides, fans or haters theres so much hypocracy that it's got really ridiculous.