• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

79th Gent-Wevelgem, 26th March 2017, 249 km, 1.UWT

Page 23 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Re:

on3m@n@rmy said:
Kwibus said:
King Boonen said:
Because Terpstra made the right decision.

Indeed. If he worked he probably ended 5th.

It didn't change that much for him. Sagan could've won the race, but lost it because he played the game with Terpstra.
It didn't change much for Terpstra, but it did change a lot for Sagan. He did make a point though which could certainly help him at the RvV. So it wasn't that bad for him, better make a statement in a classic than in an monument.

GVA is in stellar form and together with the fact that Sagan is extremely marked he's having a good time. RvV will be great this year.
Yep. Spot on.

Disagree. 5th or 4th in a sprint maybe, but who's chasing him down from a 2k out attack thus burning their matches for the sprint? Few have that kind of pedigree at the end of a long classic. So he could have easily exploited that situation, like PR. He only had one card yes, but it was a good one and worth playing.

By the effort of his eventual (fruitless) chase, I think he realised this too.
 
Re: Re:

Dan2016 said:
Several riders have spoken about how the dominance of race radio has made them a bit brain-dead to making their own good split-second tactical decisions. Who knows if that was part of it but it was strange to watch.

This would be the fault of the DS to not let their riders have any room to make decisions on the fly. It's an extremely basic principle that applies to so many situations beyond cycling - giving the individual freedom to make their own decision in a specific situation. The question is why do so many teams have tactically incompetent director sportifs? Do they get hired due to being part of the old boys club of the pro peloton rather than their abilities?

Kwibus said:
King Boonen said:
Because Terpstra made the right decision.

Indeed. If he worked he probably ended 5th.

He didn't have to work... false dichotomy as another poster said. He sat up instead of following the wheel in front of him. IMO Terpstra and Sagan both made a bad mistake, playing a game of chicken expecting each other to not make such a bad mistake. Terpstra and QS come out to be the biggest loser though. I don't know how you two think he made the right decision... he worked with Sagan after that. I don't know how that was possibly the right call for him to let the front two ride away, then work with Sagan after that. QS incompetence again.
 
Re:

Lexman said:
yesterday during Extra Time on Sporza they spoek of the acion of Sagan on the Kemmel, everyon agrees he permits to do it because it was a rider oif a smaller team

he wouldn' do it against a rider from a WT team

it shows also the incident from another angle

http://sporza.be/cm/sporza/wielrennen/1.2936935
That second angle really shows the action for what it is. Completely unneccessary, dangerous and bullying; a big time charlie lashing out at a little guy as a result of his own awful positioning. Shameful stuff by Sagan.
 
Jul 9, 2015
18
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
as a result of his own awful positioning. Shameful stuff by Sagan.
Well, he was caught in a crash just a few kms before Kemmelberg so it was not really "his awful positioning", he had some ground to make up before the climb and I can see the frustration played its role here.
 
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
Lexman said:
yesterday during Extra Time on Sporza they spoek of the acion of Sagan on the Kemmel, everyon agrees he permits to do it because it was a rider oif a smaller team

he wouldn' do it against a rider from a WT team

it shows also the incident from another angle

http://sporza.be/cm/sporza/wielrennen/1.2936935
That second angle really shows the action for what it is. Completely unneccessary, dangerous and bullying; a big time charlie lashing out at a little guy as a result of his own awful positioning. Shameful stuff by Sagan.
Have you ever raced, or raced as a younger guy? You expect, rightfully, to be shunted out of the way by older guys. It's racing. Look how hard these guys are going, the rider was in a faster, more experienced riders way. So it isn't dangerous as they're going slow up a hill.
 
Re: Re:

hammerthaim said:
DFA123 said:
Lexman said:
yesterday during Extra Time on Sporza they spoek of the acion of Sagan on the Kemmel, everyon agrees he permits to do it because it was a rider oif a smaller team

he wouldn' do it against a rider from a WT team

it shows also the incident from another angle

http://sporza.be/cm/sporza/wielrennen/1.2936935
That second angle really shows the action for what it is. Completely unneccessary, dangerous and bullying; a big time charlie lashing out at a little guy as a result of his own awful positioning. Shameful stuff by Sagan.
Have you ever raced, or raced as a younger guy? You expect, rightfully, to be shunted out of the way by older guys. It's racing. Look how hard these guys are going, the rider was in a faster, more experienced riders way. So it isn't dangerous as they're going slow up a hill.

And this kind of attitude perpetuates this stupidity in cycling.
 
Re: Re:

King Boonen said:
hammerthaim said:
DFA123 said:
Lexman said:
yesterday during Extra Time on Sporza they spoek of the acion of Sagan on the Kemmel, everyon agrees he permits to do it because it was a rider oif a smaller team

he wouldn' do it against a rider from a WT team

it shows also the incident from another angle

http://sporza.be/cm/sporza/wielrennen/1.2936935
That second angle really shows the action for what it is. Completely unneccessary, dangerous and bullying; a big time charlie lashing out at a little guy as a result of his own awful positioning. Shameful stuff by Sagan.
Have you ever raced, or raced as a younger guy? You expect, rightfully, to be shunted out of the way by older guys. It's racing. Look how hard these guys are going, the rider was in a faster, more experienced riders way. So it isn't dangerous as they're going slow up a hill.

And this kind of attitude perpetuates this stupidity in cycling.
Gotta draw a line somewhere. Same in every sport and a lot of other things in life. Experience and results get you certain privileges, and I don't believe that to be a bad thing, to a certain extent. "this is the life of a small cyclist."
 
Re: Re:

Rachela said:
DFA123 said:
as a result of his own awful positioning. Shameful stuff by Sagan.
Well, he was caught in a crash just a few kms before Kemmelberg so it was not really "his awful positioning", he had some ground to make up before the climb and I can see the frustration played its role here.
Well, he got caught behind the crash because he was too far back in the peloton. There's a reason riders 'waste' energy to try to stay near the front all day.

In any event, it's not excuse to be bullying another rider. It's not like that guy was being lapped or just in the way; he was actually ahead of Sagan in the race at that point - because he'd positioned himself better before then. Absolutely no excuse for such a dangerous bit of riding. If you don't want to get boxed in or stuck behind slower riders on the climbs; then stay near the front of the race all day - Sagan has the power to do that but chose not to. He messed up tactically and positionally and lashed out at someone with little power or influence in the peloton.
 
Re: Re:

hammerthaim said:
Have you ever raced, or raced as a younger guy? You expect, rightfully, to be shunted out of the way by older guys. It's racing. Look how hard these guys are going, the rider was in a faster, more experienced riders way. So it isn't dangerous as they're going slow up a hill.
FYI, Maxime Vantomme is 31 years old and ended 11th in that G-W, same time as Sagan.
Regardless, no-one should feel 'entitled' to just shove other riders aside.
 
Re: Re:

Jagartrott said:
hammerthaim said:
Have you ever raced, or raced as a younger guy? You expect, rightfully, to be shunted out of the way by older guys. It's racing. Look how hard these guys are going, the rider was in a faster, more experienced riders way. So it isn't dangerous as they're going slow up a hill.
FYI, Maxime Vantomme is 31 years old and ended 11th in that G-W, same time as Sagan.
Regardless, no-one should feel 'entitled' to just shove other riders aside.
Yes I know who Maxime Vantomme is and where he finished, that's why I said faster. Have you guys ever raced? Sagan was in the right, I'm not sure why people think this so dangerous. Talk to older (60's, 70's racers) and there were guys pulling each others brakes in the sprint etc haha.
 
Re:

Jagartrott said:
Well, in that talkshow, Vanderpoel, Tankink and Naesen all agreed that it was ridiculous and not done. I don't really care what was 'normal' behaviour in the 60s or 70s.
Exactly. Lots of things happened in the past which are completely unacceptable by today's standards. There is just no defence for nearly making a rider crash, because of nothing but you're own frustration.

Also, it's absolutely right to call out bullying by a rider like Sagan, who spends a lot of time and money (in combination with his sponsors) to present the image of being a cool guy who' is respectful and unfazed by everything. If Bouhanni had done something similar, absolutely no-one would be defending him; people would be asking for a ban. And it should be exactly the same for someone with a manufactured good-guy persona like Sagan.
 
Re: Re:

Jagartrott said:
hammerthaim said:
Have you ever raced, or raced as a younger guy? You expect, rightfully, to be shunted out of the way by older guys. It's racing. Look how hard these guys are going, the rider was in a faster, more experienced riders way. So it isn't dangerous as they're going slow up a hill.
FYI, Maxime Vantomme is 31 years old and ended 11th in that G-W, same time as Sagan.
Regardless, no-one should feel 'entitled' to just shove other riders aside.
Indeed. And by that ridiculous logic, surely there could be no complaints if Vantomme - as the more experienced rider - pushed Sagan into the hedge on the Koppenberg this weekend. Or maybe if Pozzato - as the older guy - decided to shunt GVA out of the way because he wanted the nicer line on the Oude Kwaremont. :eek:
 
Re:

Jagartrott said:
Well, in that talkshow, Vanderpoel, Tankink and Naesen all agreed that it was ridiculous and not done. I don't really care what was 'normal' behaviour in the 60s or 70s.
What Bouhanni has done is ridiculous and not done. Battle for position is the true spirit of the cobbles!
 
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
Jagartrott said:
hammerthaim said:
Have you ever raced, or raced as a younger guy? You expect, rightfully, to be shunted out of the way by older guys. It's racing. Look how hard these guys are going, the rider was in a faster, more experienced riders way. So it isn't dangerous as they're going slow up a hill.
FYI, Maxime Vantomme is 31 years old and ended 11th in that G-W, same time as Sagan.
Regardless, no-one should feel 'entitled' to just shove other riders aside.
Indeed. And by that ridiculous logic, surely there could be no complaints if Vantomme - as the more experienced rider - pushed Sagan into the hedge on the Koppenberg this weekend. Or maybe if Pozzato - as the older guy - decided to shunt GVA out of the way because he wanted the nicer line on the Oude Kwaremont. :eek:
Shunting out of the way on Oude Kwaremont is done every time people race up it, there was no greater risk of Vantomme crashing compared to 200km of railing corners and riding in crosswinds. "Such is the life of a small cyclist"
 
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
Jagartrott said:
hammerthaim said:
Have you ever raced, or raced as a younger guy? You expect, rightfully, to be shunted out of the way by older guys. It's racing. Look how hard these guys are going, the rider was in a faster, more experienced riders way. So it isn't dangerous as they're going slow up a hill.
FYI, Maxime Vantomme is 31 years old and ended 11th in that G-W, same time as Sagan.
Regardless, no-one should feel 'entitled' to just shove other riders aside.
Indeed. And by that ridiculous logic, surely there could be no complaints if Vantomme - as the more experienced rider - pushed Sagan into the hedge on the Koppenberg this weekend. Or maybe if Pozzato - as the older guy - decided to shunt GVA out of the way because he wanted the nicer line on the Oude Kwaremont. :eek:
New tactic for Bora: Hire Djamolidine Abdoujaparov and get him to sprint from behind into the bunch of favourites with Sagan on his wheel.