bobs *** said:
Regarding the Allen Lame denials.... Do you have any idea how many athletes, not just in cycling, we have been treated to such a wide sweeping unequivocal denial?
How many times do you have to hear the same lie out of a different mouth before you realize what it is?
Well, when you are accussed of something that is not true, what are you supposed to do?
Denial is not proof of guilt.
Trying to say that taking a better paying job in a hogher profile outfit is proof is .... even more silly.
Not too mention, there are plenty of posts in here that think Allen is the 'key', well, the key did not turn and has publically denied the accussation.
Again, I can accuse you of being doped to the hilt to. Now that the accussation is in place .... either except a two year ban from any all sport ... or find a way to rebut the accussation without actually denying the accussation (which looks even more suspicious doesn't it?)
Again, I have said this before, and I will say it again. Any of these guys can be guilty of doping. I really don't care whether they are or are not. What is at issue is making a compelling case to 'prove' doping. If we cannot do that, then all we have is suspicion and innuendo, and there are few forces out there that are as destructive as those two influences.
Quite frankly if a latrine cleaning grunt can walk through the arguement, what do you think even a really bad attorney is going to do to it?