whittashau said:
I was just looking at the top 50. There has to be at least 30 confirmed dopers in there.
top 20 all confirmed dopers other than Zubeldia, Popo, Evans and Guerini. I think a clean Cadel would need to have a VO2max of a 100 to top 10 in that Tour like he did.
when does the appellation "clean" seem to mean "I am stupid". Any polymath liberal arts grad, asking to assess in a sample, if the norms dictate the top 50 winningest riders, have all had infractions, then to assert an individual exists OUTSIDE those parameters.
When all the science and technology is not a rounding error on a comprehensive medical program (shoutout to D-Queued) !!!.
folks gotta stop bringing a judgemental and pre-conceived moralistic lens to doping. The norms of the sport accept it. How can this be denied with all the overwhelming evidence that asserts. and asserts otherwise in respect to its moral status. its not an ethical issue wrt the sport. it is accepted.
jv has attempted to move the pendulum. respect for that.
the problem with the puritanical lens, many new fans to the sport are unaware of the history, and believe that these are moral crimes. it allows individuals to be slandered like ricco, and others to be deified like armstrong. most on the continent, know the history of the sport, and do not see it thru such an ignorant lens.
professors catlin, yesalis, savulescu have all said as much wrt the doping issue.