- Jun 13, 2012
- 204
- 0
- 0
Gung Ho Gun said:Would've been closer
Still not near Uran
Cadel did look gassed well before the attacks
Gung Ho Gun said:Would've been closer
Still not near Uran
Gung Ho Gun said:It's completely beyond me why he tried to sprint onto Uran's wheel the second time, when Aru went - and then collapsed
Surely a guy with his experience (in collapsing) should have been smarter and settled for his own tempo sooner?
senatorrick said:If Cadel had a super strong Sanchez today would the outcome have been different ?? Does anyone think he could have passed Uran??
Gung Ho Gun said:It's completely beyond me why he tried to sprint onto Uran's wheel the second time, when Aru went - and then collapsed
Surely a guy with his experience (in collapsing) should have been smarter and settled for his own tempo sooner?
Gung Ho Gun said:It's completely beyond me why he tried to sprint onto Uran's wheel the second time, when Aru went - and then collapsed
Surely a guy with his experience (in collapsing) should have been smarter and settled for his own tempo sooner?
I think I had to laugh most about Rinero being present on the list.red_flanders said:Admirable effort but comical. Andy Schleck? Jose Maria Jiminez? Long list of dopers on his clean list...
BigMac said:The astonishing majority of those names are long gone, so why should we not at least believe the panorama is different?
Two years ago in my class, there were this condescending small group of brats who cheated in almost every test. To keep up with them and in order not to be considered inferior or dumber, the majority of the students decided to start cheating as well. It was full banana republic. However, once they left and went to another school, it all went back to normal. No more cheating. It was all an honest thing again once for all.
Cool story eh?
BigMac said:The astonishing majority of those names are long gone, so why should we not at least believe the panorama is different?
The Hitch said:Have a read through the discussion and see if you really meant to write this.
In the meantime this " average tt field" argument is getting tiring.
The average race has an average field. By definition. If Evans had beaten Martin or cancellara we would mention that. Them not being there does not suddenly make the performance poor.
We already know who was in the race thank you very much. Our comments have already accounted for the competition, don't need to.be reminded - oh so and so wasn't there.
Evans tt ability has always been tragically overestimated by the aggressive packs of Evans fans who have always in my eyes made some of the sky defenders look like saints. In all his years as a gt rider he has 1 tt win retroactively given to him.
Now at an age when most gt riders have lost their power, he comes 3rd in a tt which is above his average gt tt finish, and they begin to act like it's a performance so weak it rules out doping.
observer said:I think the racing this Giro, from all the competitors so far, is looking clean-ish.
there is no real crazy controlling of the race, and those who go deep, seem to suffer for it in the coming day(s).
People are attacking, but aren't sustaining these without paying. Pozzovivo paid for it, Uran paid for the hard TT, and Evans is paying for his age and just keeping up.
There may be some doping going on, but for me the racing is enjoyable because its unpredictable and exciting, and could pass as clean (in my opinion), and that includes Evans, who I think will continue to fade on the big mountains, maybe stay in touch and put in a nice MTT.
observer said:...and that includes Evans, who I think will continue to fade on the big mountains, maybe stay in touch and put in a nice MTT.
Archibald said:Here's another question for you. If Evans was doped for it, should he not have accounted for Uran?
So, do you think that the difference between;
- a doped Uran and a doped Evans is 1.34?
- a clean Uran and a doped Evans is 1.34?
- a doped Uran and a clean Evans is 1.34?
- a clean Uran and a clean Evans is 1.34?
blackcat said:false dichotomy to think a declining Evans and a decling performance is necessarly a clean performance.
case in point, at what stage when a race and competition on the line, will a decling performance by Armstrong be a clean performance? 55? 65?
Benotti69 said:Heck i dont believe Moser rides his gran fondos clean and he is what 62....
These guys get so into taking stuff they never clean up their act.
Zam_Olyas said:WIll you still be banging about the peloton and cleaER or cleans in your 90's![]()
?
Benotti69 said:Everyone looked at those 2 and said, 'that's fine, they were arrogant SOBs, look at all those garmin, Leipheimer, Hincapie who got a slap on the wrist and got to keep their ill gotten gains'........
proffate said:Levi at least lost a job and ended his career a year earlier.
Benotti69 said:Maybe you missed his gran fondo............
Ended his career at 38!!!! FFS do you know how many end their career at 38....
blackcat said:false dichotomy to think a declining Evans and a decling performance is necessarly a clean performance.
case in point, at what stage when a race and competition on the line, will a decling performance by Armstrong be a clean performance? 55? 65?
whittashau said:I still see a lot about Cadel being an example of a clean champion. Utter BS. Just look at the Tour in 05:
The top 50. It would be lucky if there is 10 clean riders there, even 5 might be pushing it. Yet Evans is 9th. And everyone ahead of him is a certified cheat.
He couldn't have finished in that position while clean. Full stop