• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Cav is...

Page 3 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jamsque said:
Whatever, dude. Both Cav and Haussler saw that Ciolek was going backwards and moved across to be in front of him, and neither of them saw the other, and they rode in to each other. There was no malicious intent on the part of either of them, and no great incompetence either. It was an accident. Sprinting is dangerous. It happens.
It wasn't deliberate, it wasn't malicious, it wasn't vindictive.

It was, however, stupid, and Cav's fault. I see very little to blame Haussler for here. He didn't move anything like as much as Cav did. Cav must shoulder pretty much all responsibility for it, but it was clumsy rather than spiteful.
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
Visit site
Jamsque said:
Sprinting is dangerous.

Which is precisely the reason why the sprinting-in-a-straight-line-rule applies.
Your flippant and apologetic attitude is a great comfort for Arnaud Coyot, I bet.
Out with a broken hip, is he?
 
Mar 11, 2009
5,841
4
0
Visit site
Clumsy I'll accept, and Cav was certainly moving more than Haussler. I don't think it was anything too far beyond what happens in any normal sprint finish though.

I doubt Arnaud Coyot gives a crap either way.
 
May 5, 2009
696
1
0
Visit site
actually, it's Ciolek's fault, he shouldn't sprint for a stage win with the big guys, he is to slow and therefore a dangerous obstacle :D

[not bo taken too seriously]

seems that Cav was definitely zig-zaging, so he got penalized by the jury, although Haussler was not innocent with his bodycheck :cool:
 
Feb 28, 2010
1,661
0
0
Visit site
Wow, sprinters in crash metres from line, who would have thought it?

Still I suppose Cavendish can now join the ranks of the real hardcore sprinters.
 
Aug 6, 2009
1,901
1
0
Visit site
la.margna said:
actually, it's Ciolek's fault, he shouldn't sprint for a stage win with the big guys, he is to slow and therefore a dangerous obstacle :D

[not bo taken too seriously]

seems that Cav was definitely zig-zaging, so he got penalized by the jury, although Haussler was not innocent with his bodycheck :cool:

He wasn't penalized in any real way, calling a 30 second time loss a slap on the wrist would be an overstatement. He's a sprinter, he cares for winning stages not for whether he's number 100 or 110 in the GC. Now I agree that he obviously didn't intend to cause a crash, but giving him some non-penalty is just stupid, either he should be punished or he shouldn't. Make-believe punishments are pointless.
 
Mar 18, 2009
4,186
0
0
Visit site
Blind Cav fans aside, it's what everyone else is saying: There's a reason you sprint in a straight line and don't block. The reason is, if you do, these things happen.

Cavendish swerved wildly three times during the sprint. The third time he took someone down.

It's as bad as Bos throwing Impey.
 

flicker

BANNED
Aug 17, 2009
4,153
0
0
Visit site
Cerberus said:
He wasn't penalized in any real way, calling a 30 second time loss a slap on the wrist would be an overstatement. He's a sprinter, he cares for winning stages not for whether he's number 100 or 110 in the GC. Now I agree that he obviously didn't intend to cause a crash, but giving him some non-penalty is just stupid, either he should be punished or he shouldn't. Make-believe punishments are pointless.

A slap on the wrist yes. Intentional no. Cleaner then any Robbie McQuewan sprint yes.
 
Feb 18, 2010
882
0
0
Visit site
Cerberus said:
He wasn't penalized in any real way, calling a 30 second time loss a slap on the wrist would be an overstatement.

Oh, but he also got a 200 Swiss francs fine. I bet he's counting the pennies as we speak!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
thing is, it was fairly obvious at about 500m that there was going to be a crash, id alreads said to the telly that it was going to end in tears. The leadouts were a mess, the corners and things before the finish were crap, one corner with a huge high kerb on one side and railings on the other, so by the time they got to 300m they were battling for space.

Cavendish and Haussler where both converging on cioleck and to be honest its a good job they hit each other or cioleck would have been wiped out. Cav caused the actual crash, but if he hadnt I think heinchrich would have caused one 20yards later.

The whole sprint was a mess and part of the blame lies on organisers..

Then again, we all love a good crash in the final kilometre as long as nobody is hurt
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
Visit site
Jamsque said:
Clumsy I'll accept, and Cav was certainly moving more than Haussler. I don't think it was anything too far beyond what happens in any normal sprint finish though.

I doubt Arnaud Coyot gives a crap either way.

Of course this wasn't a normal sprint finish, or they'd be outlawed in a sec.
He moved more than acceptable, causing a pile-up and (by the looks of it) a broken hip. Nothing more to it. Nothing less.
 
Jun 15, 2009
835
0
0
Visit site
TeamSkyFans said:
thing is, it was fairly obvious at about 500m that there was going to be a crash, id alreads said to the telly that it was going to end in tears. The leadouts were a mess, the corners and things before the finish were crap, one corner with a huge high kerb on one side and railings on the other, so by the time they got to 300m they were battling for space.

Cavendish and Haussler where both converging on cioleck and to be honest its a good job they hit each other or cioleck would have been wiped out. Cav caused the actual crash, but if he hadnt I think heinchrich would have caused one 20yards later.

The whole sprint was a mess and part of the blame lies on organisers..

Then again, we all love a good crash in the final kilometre as long as nobody is hurt

Well, somebody DID get hurt, so I suppose we don't all love it. The riders had already passed through the area at a more leisurely pace, and a crash did occur first time around. In addition they had been briefed this morning on todays' circuit. How much more help does Cav need to learn to read what's before him and act accordingly? Your thesis that part of the blame is to be lain at the organisers' doorstep is just plain silly.
 
Mar 12, 2009
701
0
0
Visit site
issoisso said:
Blind Cav fans aside, it's what everyone else is saying: There's a reason you sprint in a straight line and don't block. The reason is, if you do, these things happen.

Cavendish swerved wildly three times during the sprint. The third time he took someone down.

It's as bad as Bos throwing Impey.


i normally respect your opinions as you always talk a lot of sense and are one of the most widely knowledgeable on here, but that quote is completely wrong.

Cav was in the wrong, but it was a mistake and it wasnt deliberate and he wasnt the only one to blame. 80% Cav, 10% organisers, 10% haussler
 
Maybe Cav wasn't at fault for the crash, check out the front wheel:

sui10st04-sprint.jpg


P.S. IMO he was still riding reckless
 
May 13, 2009
3,093
3
0
Visit site
El Oso said:
Maybe Cav wasn't at fault for the crash, check out the front wheel:

sui10st04-sprint.jpg


P.S. IMO he was still riding reckless

I looked at the vid several times and it first did look to me as if the Manx dud hit something on the road like a bit of sand or oil or whatever which caused him to lose balance. The video is a bit unclear, but the crash happened at 1:19 and it does look like, when you look very carefully, that the wheel breaks first, then Cavendouche goes down.

So, yes, he's a fvcking idiot for being all over the road, but maybe the actual crash could have been caused by the wheel breaking in two.
 
Mar 11, 2009
5,841
4
0
Visit site
I don't think any sprinter ever kicks in a perfectly straight line. They are always moving across the road. Granted, Cav today probably moved more than most do, but it was nothing totally out of the ordinary, it was just unfortunate that Haussler was moving across the road in the opposite direction and they didn't see each other.

But I'm wasting my breath, this thread was started so people who already hated Cavendish could hurl insults at him, not for any actual discussion of today's crash.
 
Jun 3, 2009
109
0
0
Visit site
Cavendish was to blame, he seriously attempted to block out Ciolek by swinging across. Bad crash.
Broken wheel? Having watched in super slow motion I don't buy it.
 
Mar 12, 2009
701
0
0
Visit site
Jamsque said:
I don't think any sprinter ever kicks in a perfectly straight line. They are always moving across the road. Granted, Cav today probably moved more than most do, but it was nothing totally out of the ordinary, it was just unfortunate that Haussler was moving across the road in the opposite direction and they didn't see each other.

But I'm wasting my breath, this thread was started so people who already hated Cavendish could hurl insults at him, not for any actual discussion of today's crash.

i do agree with you. cav was in wrong but it was an accident, accidents happen. in that one photo cav looks really shaken up