Cian is one of the rare riders that went to Visma and is now performing worse. So something is off and lets hope they figure it out.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
They were not close at his age. And it took them many more years before they showed something beyond what he has already shown last year. No recency bias at all. In 2016 Kruijswijk was 28 years old.
Yes. Later in their careers. He at 20 was better than Kruijswijk was not only when he was 20, but also when he was 22 or 25. I didn't say they never at any time managed a better performance than Uijtdebroeks did at 20.
Chad might end up a very solid rider but it is completely pointless to compare today's young riders performance at x age vs older generations of riders who were not trained the way kids/juniors train todayYes. Later in their careers. He at 20 was better than Kruijswijk was not only when he was 20, but also when he was 22 or 25. I didn't say they never at any time managed a better performance than Uijtdebroeks did at 20.
Point is that his 2023 season would already be one of the better seasons in Kruijswijk's or Kelderman's long careers, and we know those are not going to get better anymore. So i think it's a bit disingenuous to say that's his level, while he has only completed one full pro season and in his second one, clearly something is wrong.Kruijswijk was 23 years old and got 9th(8th) 13’51” (7’41”) on a far harder 2011 Goro d’Italia course compared to 2023 Vuelta. While 20 year old Kruijswijk might not be better than 20 year old Cian, then23 year old version was definitely better compared to the 20 year old Cian. It then took till the 2015 Giro before Kruijswijk came back to high placings in GTs, could be the same for Cian.
Jokepost? You are now going to compare the career of a 21 year old to those of guys 10-15 years older? Also who was comparing him to Kuss, a fluke GT winner? Chances are that won't happen to him, that's true. Far better riders than Kuss have never won a GT.To even end up with a career like Kruijswijk, Kelderman, Kuss, he needs to improve a lot.
I'm sorry, what? Uijtdebroeks was 8th in the friggin' Vuelta, which wouldn't be anything to write home about if it weren't for the fact that he was like 15 years old. Other than that, he was 6th in Romandie and 7th in Suisse. Meanwhile, Kelderman has been 4th, 7th and 10th, plus 5th at the Tour and 3rd and 7th at the Giro, and he routinely gets better results than Cian's in top-level one-week races. Uijtdebroeks came in 95th place in the 2023 CQ Ranking, Kelderman has scored better than that in EIGHT separate seasons (and he's on track to make that nine seasons). Are you overrating Uijtdebroeks, or massively underrating Kelderman?Point is that his 2023 season would already be one of the better seasons in Kruijswijk's or Kelderman's long careers
OMG, thank you! Why didn't i think of that! The CQ ranking! It could have been so easy to end debates about Evenepoel being better than Van der Poel, Vingegaard, Roglic and everyone else except Pogacar. The CQ ranking, of course!I'm sorry, what? Uijtdebroeks was 8th in the friggin' Vuelta, which wouldn't be anything to write home about if it weren't for the fact that he was like 15 years old. Other than that, he was 6th in Romandie and 7th in Suisse. Meanwhile, Kelderman has been 4th, 7th and 10th, plus 5th at the Tour and 3rd and 7th at the Giro, and he routinely gets better results than Cian's in top-level one-week races. Uijtdebroeks came in 95th place in the 2023 CQ Ranking, Kelderman has scored better than that in EIGHT separate seasons (and he's on track to make that nine seasons). Are you overrating Uijtdebroeks, or massively underrating Kelderman?
This can all be trained to an extent. Sure, he'll never be Valverde, but look at how Remco has improved his explosivity for example. Riders tend to get more well-rounded as they mature. Even Kruiswijk was more of an all-rounder than he gets credit for when he was at his best.I just don't see world class rider in Cian at all. I see a very good rider, but with a limited skillset centered around high mountain climbing and not much else, so unless youre just flat out the best, youre not gonna win very much. Kruijswijk did that in the 2016 Giro that he should have won, and Mas has three top 2s and is looking to be the best rider this year. Not bad company, but I think Mas has more to his game than Cian since he's actually very good at shorter efforts as well in peak shape and can go mano-a-mano with Roglic (as we have seen countless of times, although never winning). Add that to an insane talent pool at the moment
I'm always baffled, actually it is with some admiration I observe with how much confidence you spout nonsense. You just smoothly omit plenty of WT top-10s of Kelderman at UAE Tour, Poland, Tour Down Under, Eneco Tour etc. Plus, I fully agree with you on your CQ ranking slander, I also think it is not the best indicator of how great one's career is, but ignoring cycling quotients actually favours riders like Kelderman. Take last year f.i., where he had a crucial role as a domestique for Vingegaard in winning the Tour, didn't give him any points but did show how decent of a cyclist he was. I fully agree with @hrotha on this one.OMG, thank you! Why didn't i think of that! The CQ ranking! It could have been so easy to end debates about Evenepoel being better than Van der Poel, Vingegaard, Roglic and everyone else except Pogacar. The CQ ranking, of course!
Now, back in the real world, the one where we look at races and results, Uijtdebroeks' 2023 season had:
Vuelta: 8th, Suisse: 7th, Romandie: 6th, Catalunya: 9th.
In exactly what universe is Kelderman's 2024 better, with just Suisse: 9th and Paris Nice: 8th?
His 2023? Suisse: 4th. That's all.
2022? No top 10.
2021 Tour: 5th, Dauphiné: 4th, Romandie: 10th, Catalunya: 5th.
2020 Giro: 3rd, TA: 4th.
2019 Vuelta: 7th.
2018 Vuelta: 10th, Suisse: 5th.
2017 Vuelta: 4th, Romandie: 9th.
2016 Suisse: 8th.
2015 Catalunya: 9th.
2014 Giro: 7th, Dauphiné: 4th.
2013: Romandie: 5th.
2012: Dauphiné: 8th.
So, tell me, how many seasons out of a 13 year career do you think are better? I count 3. Maybe 4. My original statement, that Uijtdebroeks 2023 would already rate among the better seasons in Kelderman's and Kruijswijk's careers, stands.
All I've learned from this thread is that Bentacur is the goat for sneaking into that top 25 list. What a legend.Haters without fans gets you Moscon. Little activity.
Fans without haters gets you Nibali. More activity.
I think by far the majority of the Contador thread's activity was dedicated fans.
So I think #1 determinant is dedicated fans, #2 determinant is how good a stage racer the rider is (EDIT: Or the other way around). Classics riders generally receive less attention, and Van der Poel has more pages than Van Aert, so haters can't be that important.
Addendum:
- Contador 51K
- Evenepoel 28K
- Froome 21K
- Pogi 19K
- Nibali 19K
- Rogla 18K
- Quintana 10K
- Valverde 9K
- Van der Poel 7K
- Armstrong 7K
- Vingegaard 7K
- Schleck 7K
- Wiggins 6K
- Sagan 6K
- Van Aert 5K
- Dumoulin 5K
- Cavendish 4K
- Porte 4K
- Pinot 4K
- Landa 4K
- Bernal 3K
- Betancur 3K
- Almeida 2K
- 2x Yates 2K
- Alaphilippe 2K
Contador has 51k after his ban. Dude would have way more if he had the same thread thoughout his career.All I've learned from this thread is that Bentacur is the goat for sneaking into that top 25 list. What a legend.
lol, no my friend. Tour Down Under, Eneco Tour and Poland do not matter in this regard. Not one bit. The one spouting nonsense here is not me. I also didn't mention Uijtdebroeks Tour of Oman top 10. And while those other races are WT, they are meaningless when it comes to GT GC potential (just ask the forum, after Evenepoel won Poland, it became utterly meaningless, lol), which was the context of the discussion. Uijtdebroeks wants to be a GT GC rider. He does not want to be a classics rider or stage hunter. For both riders, i only looked at GT and the 7 big one week GC's.I just admire with how much confidence you spout absolute bollocks.
I'm always baffled, actually it is with some admiration I observe with how much confidence you spout nonsense. You just smoothly omit plenty of WT top-10s of Kelderman at UAE Tour, Poland, Tour Down Under, Eneco Tour etc. Plus, I fully agree with you on your CQ ranking slander, I also think it is not the best indicator of how great one's career is, but ignoring cycling quotients actually favours riders like Kelderman. Take last year f.i., where he had a crucial role as a domestique for Vingegaard in winning the Tour, didn't give him any points but did show how decent of a cyclist he was. I fully agree with Hrotha on this one.
Let's ask @Valv.Piti who initially brought it up, whether he meant to compare Uijtdebroeks to Kelderman, Kruijswijk and Mas, as potential GC rider, or rather as a GC rider, with part time domestique duties, and results in races not one fcking soul on the face of the planet cares about, like a top 10 in Eneco Tour, like you seem to believe.Who's talking about GC potential only? Your comment initially was that Uijtdebroeks '2023 season would already be one of the better seasons in Kelderman’s career', not referring to only GC potential. Before that you stated that his climbing results were better than their climbing results 'even later in their careers'. You constantly make bold statements, than water them down claiming you didn't mean it that way while that is quite literally what you stated.
And yet Kruijswijk nearly won the Giro and podiumed the Tour. Plus top 5 in Vuelta. He's had a pretty good career and has been in the WT peloton for 15 years. If that's Cian's fate it's going to be better than 95% of pro cyclists'...Too limited of a rider. Diesel without top-end talent. Kruijswijk/Kelderman territory, Mas very, very best case
Great to see him in front of the peloton on donkey-duty for a changeGood efforts today. Seems he's finding himself again, step by step.
Not sure, he actually just started riding better this Vuelta, so he probably really has COVIDI suspect that, after the heavy criticism, the team is now using a Covid excuse to withdraw him from the Vuelta. But much too late.
That's great to hear. Anything at this point should be an improvement over last year.His racing calendar is a bit different from last year. Instead of building up towards a GT, they are now focussing on 1-week stage races where they expect him to learn to win. Riding finals, riding for podium, doing his best to win. His injury issues are resolved so we should be seeing an Uijtdebroeks more in the line of his 2023 season.
Tour of Oman
Tirreno-Adriatico
Tour de Romandie
Tour de Suisse