I agree. I think Harbough made bad call. But being MSU fan....Go Spartans.jmdirt said:Michigan: I know he's just a young guy in a high pressure situation, but why wouldn't the punter just fall on the ball? Its easy for me to second guess Harb, but I would have run a play, and had my QB run a few circles to kill the clock because long snaps are always a crap shoot.
I like Husky HC Chris Peterson an was hoping the Dawgs could pull off a comeback win and they nearly did, even though there were times in the second half when it looked like they were not going to have a chance. Give the Huskies credit for not giving up, coming back, and nearly winning. The biggest blame for the loss has to be on the HC, though for his play calling with 7-1/2 minutes remaining in the 4th quarter and needing 2 TDs to win. He called far too many run plays that took too much time off the clock. Huskies got one TD alright but it left only about 1 to 1-1/2 on game clock, when I thought they would try an onside kick. Ducks lined up expecting the onside, so mistake #2 was the Husks kicked it deep. Then the husky defense just could not get a quick 3-and-out. Game over. The only explanation for the horrible clock management starting at the 7-1/2 minute mark might be a slight injury to Husky starting QBs right arm that might have dictated the heavy dose on run plays during that time. You could see trainers massaging his throwing shoulder on the sideline when the defense was playing, but it was not severe enough to keep the QB off the field. Maybe they should have used the backup QB but don't know what their backup situation is like.Tricycle Rider said:Ugh. Twelve losses in a row to the Ducks, at least the final score wasn't completely humiliating. (I quit watching at halftime cause I had a bad feeling.)
Brullnux said:I take it from the plethora of live stories of college football games on my snapchat that college football season is back. I know, I am basically Sherlock Holmes.![]()
Anyway:
Being an Italo-Brit, college football isn't one of the things I tend to follow. However, some of my friends are fans, and if they talk about it I understand nothing. So could someone here perhaps give me a quick summary of what it's all about? Just it's format and the favourites for the matches, so I can impress my football fetishing friends![]()
I'd recommend just following the weekly rankings and the weekly standings on a Yankee site such as ESPN. http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankingsBrullnux said:I take it from the plethora of live stories of college football games on my snapchat that college football season is back. I know, I am basically Sherlock Holmes.![]()
Anyway:
Being an Italo-Brit, college football isn't one of the things I tend to follow. However, some of my friends are fans, and if they talk about it I understand nothing. So could someone here perhaps give me a quick summary of what it's all about? Just it's format and the favourites for the matches, so I can impress my football fetishing friends![]()
Except for one key factor: the band. I'm sure all of the Cal guys think that Miami had it easy without all of the flutes and tubas to run through!on3m@n@rmy said:http://www.sbnation.com/college-foo...canes-miracle-touchdown-return-laterals-video
crazy 8-lateral play to end game and lift Miami to win over duke.
reminiscent of the Stanford/marching band final play long ago.
I'd go with horrible defense.jmdirt said:Lotsa points:
OK State 70
OK 62
Clem 56
TTU 53 (and lost)
FSU 45
Mem 41
TCU 40
Good offense? Bad defense? A little of both?
Do you think Clemson can go all the way?52520Andrew said:Ohio State goes down
Tricycle Rider said:Do you think Clemson can go all the way?52520Andrew said:Ohio State goes down
