- Jul 6, 2010
- 2,340
- 0
- 0
MrRoboto said:Well, then you have to wonder why he even spoke about two positives in the first place. If there are many more that were caught, why only open up about these two? Why should we take the ambiguous part of what he's saying more seriously than what's clearly written? It doesn't make any sense.
Personally, I think his objective was to allude to the fact that even if athletes are getting popped, they may not be suspended due to financial, political, and even legal constraints.
When the IOC is involved, it's even more of a 'public secret' since it has the potential of marring a multi-billion dollar/euro event that is more interested in corporate marketing than clean sporting excellence.
Remember Juan Antonio Samaranch? He thought that testing at the Olys should be abolished, and he was running the show for decades.
Nice leadership...