wada should jump on the offer - the russians are offering a direct help in tracking down the hackers..buckle said:It's difficult to believe that these hackers are experts sponsored by the Russian government. This is proving a PR victory for the West who are using it for further attacks on Russia.
doolols said:buckle said:The pattern emerging from the AAFs in pt 2 is that a TUE is granted almost indefinitely to cover a failed test.
But we aren't seeing the failed tests, by and large.
I think there is still some hope (albeit faint) that fnacybear didn't just hack the Adams system.bewildered said:doolols said:buckle said:The pattern emerging from the AAFs in pt 2 is that a TUE is granted almost indefinitely to cover a failed test.
But we aren't seeing the failed tests, by and large.
Why would you expect to see failed tests from this hack? They are either made public or covered up. If public we know about them, if covered up they're hardly going to be documented are they?
thehog said:Is the athletes bio passport stored on ADAMS?
Amnes2015 said:thehog said:Is the athletes bio passport stored on ADAMS?
after hitting the gold mine (the TUE and AAF database) do you think they found the platinium mine (passport) :surprised:
again , i don't think they have full database dump, only admin level access somehow and can see what they search for, and they can't dump all the database
i would like to be wrong and have all the database public sometime in the future
More Strides than Rides said:Michelle Carter did not have an AAF.
Robert Harting had an AAF. His TUE was proactive, as opposed to retroactive; he requested and it it was granted before the date of his test.
People are reading too much into this. The thing worth looking for are patterns (We know about Zorzoli) and non-patterns (Grabrielle Dole is the IAAF TUE guy. He took a 200,000 Euro bribe for covering up Russians. He denied Carter's TUE, and accepted Hartings. ), but not individual instances. That someone needed a TUE, or a retroactive TUE, is a red herring in the anti-doping discussion
TeflonDub said:Here are Wiggins' TUEs.
Salbutamol inhalers on the top row ('08-'09).
Triamcinolone injections on the bottom ('11-'13).
]
PremierAndrew said:I imagine they would have released Cav's data alongside Wiggins and Froome. Guessing that means Cav's never had a TUE?
Imagine how good he'd be if he had asthma
We do have some AAFs leaked, but surprisingly few. So they clearly have access to some incriminating data, but maybe not all.bewildered said:doolols said:buckle said:The pattern emerging from the AAFs in pt 2 is that a TUE is granted almost indefinitely to cover a failed test.
But we aren't seeing the failed tests, by and large.
Why would you expect to see failed tests from this hack? They are either made public or covered up. If public we know about them, if covered up they're hardly going to be documented are they?
The Hitch said:Is there a TUE for EPO? Because otherwise I don't take this too seriously.
One has to be blind and dumb and on Mars (or the president of a sports governing body) to believe that there isn't mass EPO and Aicar abuse atm in sport, and probably other similar effective drugs.
That's what people are using. This cough medicine they occasionally get a TUE for is small potatoes.
Yep. A TUE isn't evidence of doping. But the ease with which athletes can get a backdated TUE for a banned substance is worth questioning.The Hitch said:That's what people are using. This cough medicine they occasionally get a TUE for is small potatoes.
PremierAndrew said:I imagine they would have released Cav's data alongside Wiggins and Froome. Guessing that means Cav's never had a TUE?
Imagine how good he'd be if he had asthma
Don't forget a sprinter's course for Worlds as well. There's a reason Cav is partying like it's 2009!Huapango said:PremierAndrew said:I imagine they would have released Cav's data alongside Wiggins and Froome. Guessing that means Cav's never had a TUE?
Imagine how good he'd be if he had asthma
I imagine Cav is riding at maximum capacity this year. The perfect storm of Cookson, Reedie and the Olympics has him in full beast-mode.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/sep/15/fancy-bears-leak-british-olympians-48-tuesMeanwhile Dr Jeroen Swart, the world renowned South African physiologist who conducted a range of tests on Chris Froome last year, told the Guardian that, while the renewed attention on the use – and potential misuse – of TUEs was welcome, there were other performance enhancement issues in sport that needed addressing. Swart specifically highlighted the use of cortisone out of competition, especially in cycling to lose weight without losing power, as well as thyroid medication use by runners to control appetite – both of which remain legal despite their apparent benefits.
hahaha. hilarious assumptions once again without a shred of evidence. how does that tinfoil hat feel?The Hitch said:Is there a TUE for EPO? Because otherwise I don't take this too seriously.
One has to be blind and dumb and on Mars (or the president of a sports governing body) to believe that there isn't mass EPO and Aicar abuse atm in sport, and probably other similar effective drugs.
That's what people are using. This cough medicine they occasionally get a TUE for is small potatoes.
TeflonDub said:More Strides than Rides said:Michelle Carter did not have an AAF.
Robert Harting had an AAF. His TUE was proactive, as opposed to retroactive; he requested and it it was granted before the date of his test.
People are reading too much into this. The thing worth looking for are patterns (We know about Zorzoli) and non-patterns (Grabrielle Dole is the IAAF TUE guy. He took a 200,000 Euro bribe for covering up Russians. He denied Carter's TUE, and accepted Hartings. ), but not individual instances. That someone needed a TUE, or a retroactive TUE, is a red herring in the anti-doping discussion
You're right, it was just the TUE request rejection (it was late last night when I was trying to get through them all!). I have edited the post. Can you answer the question I asked at the end of it?
Edit: Michelle Carter, US Gold medallist shot-putter in Rio, allegedly had a retroactive TUE request in January 2015 rejected. Three different glucocorticoids for an emergency treatment. Aren't retroactive requests usually made because of an AAF or on the expectation of one due to the half-life of the substances?
