Taxus4a said:
SKy is the only team in UK, they they have more money, so they have the best riders and the best in everything thay can pay it, it is always like that in sport and life, if you are surprising about that, you have the problem.
You're thinking of BMC. They're the team that uses the money to buy the best riders because they can pay for it. The "Sky have the money and buy the best riders" argument has more than a few holes. On the back of this, here are your Sky hires and where they were ranked in the world according to CQ the year before they joined Sky.
Edvald Boasson Hagen: 6th
Mark Cavendish: 9th
Mick Rogers: 23rd
Simon Gerrans: 41st
Bradley Wiggins: 43rd
Thomas Löfkvist: 45th
Jonathan Tiernan-Locke: 75th
Greg Henderson: 96th
Chris Sutton: 101st
Kanstantsin Siutsou: 114th
Rigoberto Urán: 121st
Dario Cataldo: 121st
Christian Knees: 122nd
Juan Antonio Flecha: 123rd
Vasil Kiryienka: 144th
Davide Appollonio: 176th
Richie Porte: 206th
Matthew Hayman: 211th
Bernhard Eisel: 217th
Sylvain Calzati: 230th
Russell Downing: 254th
Ben Swift: 264th
Kurt-Asle Arvesen: 267th
Joe Dombrowski: 334th
Sergio Luís Henao: 347th
Steve Cummings: 356th
Davide Vigano: 361st
Chris Froome: 367th
Dario Cioni: 379th
David López: 386th
Lars Petter Nordhaug: 418th
Morris Possoni: 447th
Serge Pauwels: 465th
Jeremy Hunt: 528th
Michael Barry: 550th
Ian Boswell: 574th
Salvatore Puccio: 588th
Geraint Thomas: 675th
Danny Pate: 682nd
Peter Kennaugh: 711th
Luke Rowe: 735th
Kjell Carlström: 770th
John-Lee Augustyn: 779th
Xabier Zandio: 945th
Gabriel Rasch: 979th
Ian Stannard: 1027th
Josh Edmondson: 1654th
Alex Dowsett: 1973rd
Nicolas Portal: 2310th
Now, obviously this is a bit of a misnomer; Kurt-Asle Arvesen and Matthew Hayman for example were renowned as top quality road captain and classic domestique respectively, much as Sylwester Szmyd's CQ score won't tell you what a top quality rider he was in '08-'09 or so. Also, a rider like Russell Downing was competing for the win in every race he got to enter in 2009, but on the domestic scene that didn't allow for so many points; Sergio Henao was seen as a megatalent, but many of the races he was bossing in Colombia had no UCI status so would not reflect in CQ; while somebody who is only highly visible in one part of the season like Juan Antonio Flecha can be one of the best at his chosen specialism without it reflecting in his scores. However, it says quite a lot that so few of the Sky riders were top 100 CQ scores before they signed - and in fact a lot of the highest ranked riders in their pre-Sky days are ones that have not improved at Sky (EBH has stagnated, Gerrans struggled at Sky before coming back to prominence late in his contract and as he moved to GreenEdge, Löfkvist has fallen well away from his pre-Sky level).
(An aside, was Geraint Thomas injured in 2009? I don't recall, but it isn't an Olympic/track-focus year, and he received a lot of attention for his potential when he signed for Sky, there's a three month gap between results mid-season there as well).
The numbers are also skewed by changing roles, of course. At Milram, Christian Knees was one of their strongest rouleurs and often picked up placements in classics and so forth resulting in good CQ scores but often picked up fairly anonymously. At Sky his scores have plummeted as they've used that engine to turn him into their top choice of flat domestique in the big races - not bad for somebody picked up at the last minute off waivers in the wake of the Pegasus disaster! Similarly Dario Cataldo, who had had a free hand in the non-GC-minded Quick Step, became a mountain domestique for the Colombians and Wiggins instead.
So, overall, the team whose domination is understandable because they buy the best have purchased 49 riders over their four years of existence (I have not included riders purchased for 2014, as they haven't raced for Sky yet to join the ranks of peloton dominators, so we should only judge those who've already participated in the displays of peloton dominance that we're debating whether the team have bought the best for). Of these, 8 have been ranked in the top 100 in the world before signing for Sky (16,33%). Interestingly, of the top 10 riders named (i.e. those who had the ten best pre-Sky rankings) 6 of them come from the same team (HTC-High Road). Also of note is that of that list, the two that have been implicated in current doping are both among those up at the top (Rogers and Tiernan-Locke).
Now, obviously there are many flaws in this methodology and I will not try to pretend there aren't. However, I would extrapolate from this two hypotheses:
1) purchasing "the top riders" does not necessarily lead to top success, as some of these may have peaked young like Löfkvist, may have been Pecharromán-style flukes, or may be more suspicious like JTL - if buying "the top riders" guaranteed top success you would expect BMC to outperform Sky and Movistar with their purchases such as Evans (3rd prior to joining), Gilbert (1st) and Hushovd (40th);
2) Sky demonstrably did not succeed simply due to purchasing "the top riders" as they have purchased riders from all kinds of success levels. They haven't done the USPS job of signing GT candidates to ride in service of their GT leader, paying them back with Giri and Vueltas - they have purchased strong peripheral GC men and sent them to work as domestiques (Cataldo, Siutsou) and had riders who had previously not been superstars turn into them (Froome, Porte). This latter group were quite demonstrably not "the best" when they signed for Sky, which makes the "they bought the best" argument a bit redundant. This latter group have leapfrogged the few names Sky had bought that actually
were among the best when Sky signed them.
For the record though, Sky's 2014 signings:
Mikel Nieve: 104th
Philip Deignan: 266th
Nathan Earle: 328th
Sebastian Henao: 2946th