kwikki said:
I don't think Froome contested the sprint.
Froome wasn't after the win, he was after seconds over the GC riders. You could tell that by the way he looked back repeatedly and as he crossed the line. Sagan knew he would win and started to slacken off. Froome started a sprint to force Sagan to carry him over the line quicker. Froome also sprinted to ensure he took second place and the 6 second bonus.
I don't think what we just saw was anything extraordinary. It was several of the best riders in the world being at the front and exploiting a crosswind. The way Froome bridged wasn't incredible, it was an immediate reaction and he was all over the bike trying to get on.
Then look at the end result. Froome buried himself to get 15 seconds over Quintana. He got those 15 seconds because Quintana f*****d up big time.
Remember 2009? Similar thing happened between LA and AC. LA grabbed some seconds, but who won in the end...
Might have been worth it, but it isn't certain.
I think that's a bit simplistic. Quintana didn't really mess it up. He just didn't have anything like the power to bridge to two of the best cobbled riders in the world, a super TTist and (increduously) Froome. Even Kristoff couldn't get across the gap.
The question is how can Froome, a guy who is also the best climber and one of the best TTist in the world, bridge across to classics specialists, and then do more than his fair share of work to hold off a peloton full of sprint trains? He's skinny enough to take minutes on the field in a hard MTF, aero enough to beat the specialists in flat time trials, and powerful enough to drive a break through echelons. It's just ridiculous that this is now seen as a normal level for him.