Johan gets served

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 9, 2009
976
0
0
fatandfast said:
Alpe's comments reflect something very unAmerican. Lance or anybody else are not required to confess anything even if they are guilty,simply not the way the system works. If accused of a crime that happened 10 years ago in Europe,was passed over by a very committed and competent Novitzky squad, it would be logical to allow the process to play out. The question of ethics is dumb.
I would love to see the day when everybody from speeders on the freeway to drug dealers,murders,tax cheats,ect all rolled over when accused of a crime. yes your honor I was going 71mph in a 55 zone please punish me. This is like an after school special.

Oh please. So the American way is to lie and cheat as long as you're not busted, that way you never have to confess? You're focused only on criminal procedure. Most people actually do give passing thought to ethics and morality in their lives.
 
Oct 30, 2011
2,639
0
0
Zweistein said:
Before he came back, didn't he say basically Saestra was weak champion and I was so much stronger than any of these guys? Maybe, it is me but to me that sound a lot like your quote.

He was pretty rude to Sastre and Vandervelde, yeah. I believe the "What's actually so bad about Lance, guys?" thread has it in there somewhere.
 
fatandfast said:
Alpe's comments reflect something very unAmerican. Lance or anybody else are not required to confess anything even if they are guilty,simply not the way the system works. If accused of a crime that happened 10 years ago in Europe,was passed over by a very committed and competent Novitzky squad, it would be logical to allow the process to play out. The question of ethics is dumb.
I would love to see the day when everybody from speeders on the freeway to drug dealers,murders,tax cheats,ect all rolled over when accused of a crime. yes your honor I was going 71mph in a 55 zone please punish me. This is like an after school special.

"UnAmerican?" In my version of "America" people are free to develop their own moral outlook. Maybe that's unAmerican too . . .
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
Topangarider said:
Not sure I understand what you mean in the last paragraph. Can you please clarify? Thanks

The separate Floyd investigation probably spun-out of the Lance investigation. As facts were uncovered, they probably called the prosecutor in San Diego to see where it went. Meanwhile, they kept-up their work investigating the Lance stuff. But it went somewhere. And that probably killed the case up in Los Angeles, as Floyd was likely a star witness in the Lance case.

They probably found lots of stuff against Lance, and were really ****ed at having to let him get away. Hence Floyd finds himself facing charges that he was already admitting to. Immunity went bye-bye.
 
fatandfast said:
Alpe's comments reflect something very unAmerican. Lance or anybody else are not required to confess anything even if they are guilty,simply not the way the system works. If accused of a crime that happened 10 years ago in Europe,was passed over by a very committed and competent Novitzky squad, it would be logical to allow the process to play out. The question of ethics is dumb.
I would love to see the day when everybody from speeders on the freeway to drug dealers,murders,tax cheats,ect all rolled over when accused of a crime. yes your honor I was going 71mph in a 55 zone please punish me. This is like an after school special.

'UnAmerican' - when the American legal system relies on plea bargains and confessions aplenty, I find that rather amusing.
 
May 18, 2009
3,757
0
0
Race Radio said:
I have to say I am more then a little disappointed that Mark and Joe have not given me any credit. Have been saying this would happens for weeks. :D

OK, what was he subpoena'd for?
 
Race Radio said:
Johan thinks if he doesn't say anything it will all go away. When the Feds meet you at the Airport clearly it is not "Going Away" it is getting worse.

He is smart to not comment. When he goes off on his rambles about trolls he just looks silly. It is not my fault he is in trouble.....and telling people where I live is not going to stop the Feds

I have to say I am more then a little disappointed that Mark and Joe have not given me any credit. Have been saying this would happens for weeks. :D

Question remains why didn't Fabani tell the Hog to stay in London?
 
ChrisE said:
You guys are on LA hate induced out-of-context quote wishful-thinking crack.

No way he will let this go down without a fight. He's scared of fighting allegations due to doping revelations? That is one of the more idiotic statements I have heard, as if FL and TH on 60 minutes are potential future events instead of past. You cryptically get this out of the MJ quote with your armchair mindreading skills. :rolleyes:

I've said this before....you guys need to vent your energy into something a little more positive than hating LA. It is making you unhinged and more irrational than normal.

200km this weekend, and still hating strong.

Maybe riding gives me more hating energy, not less :)
 
Hugh Januss said:
It's not enough to correctly predict what's gonna happen unless you explain exactly why it happened.
No credit for RR from the fanboys.:rolleyes:

Credit for predicting Johan would be served, really? Everybody knew this would happen including Johan.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
JRTinMA said:
Credit for predicting Johan would be served, really? Everybody knew this would happen including Johan.


Yep. Gonna call bull**** on that one.
 

Polish

BANNED
Mar 11, 2009
3,853
1
0
Well, I will admit I was wrong. Partly wrong technically.

Uptread I predicted that Bruyneel would not even make it to the start of the Amgen Tour of California. Find some excuse not to come. But I also predicted that he would not make it to the end, and if he did he would be thrown under a bus on his way back to the airport. So technically, I still have a shot to be able to say "told you so" squish squish;)

photo-97.jpg
 
MarkvW said:
I guess this time the Good United States served Johan. Fortunately, the Bad United States was not on the case!

Lance has already stated he was "just another rider" on the team. Appears the master tactician was also the king pin the Feds were looking for. Lance might have done a deal and sold the Hog in. If Bruyneel was the supplier and orchestrator of the drugs through Europe they might have got their man.

I have my fingers crossed that Johan didn't ship drugs to the United States. That would be bad.
 
Bruyneel wasn't with RadioShack riders as they departed from their team bus Sunday morning just before the start of the eight-day tour that ends next weekend in Los Angeles. He is expected to be with the team Monday for Stage 2 from San Francisco to Aptos.

The cycling news outlets reported this weekend that Lance Armstrong's former team director was greeted by federal agents when entering the country. Martens said the former pro racer arrived Friday.

Bruyneel was Armstrong's manager during his record seven Tour de France victories as well as Alberto Contador's 2007 title. He was the target of an investigation in 2010 by the Belgian cycling federation after being accused by Floyd Landis of playing a role in a systematic drug program for Armstrong's U.S. Postal Service team.

Armstrong and Bruyneel have repeatedly denied the allegations.

http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking...armstrongs-former-manager-rejoin-team-stage-2
 
I think it's funny that we don't know the nature of the subpoena. He's got to appear in court to give testimony, but we have no idea whether it's in his own defence or to give evidence in a case against someone else.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
1
0
JRTinMA said:
Credit for predicting Johan would be served, really? Everybody knew this would happen including Johan.

Nope, complete surprise....which is why Johan is spending the next week hiding in the bus, telling journalists to F*ck off
 
doolols said:
I think it's funny that we don't know the nature of the subpoena. He's got to appear in court to give testimony, but we have no idea whether it's in his own defence or to give evidence in a case against someone else.

I'm curious to know who's representing Bruyneel in court- LA's lawyers?:D

BTW - I wrote a while ago that JB might be the key to unveil this mess- and I think is happening:D