I have just posted this in the Pogacar clinic thread: same applies here.
AS MODERATOR
Thankfully, there is some of what you describe first. There is also a desperate amount of the other, meaning that attempts at sensible discussion are in danger of being drowned out.
A reminder of a selection from forum rules, stickied at the top of this section:
And, in full, the clinic specific supplement to the rules
- Discussion or speculation of professional cyclist use of performance enhancers or banned substances should include supporting evidence.
- Users are required to provide evidence when challenged, as well as engaging with arguments counter to the assertion with substantive facts and references.