- Jul 21, 2012
- 9,860
- 3
- 0
Good to know the sport is cleaner than ever. Everyone has faith in this new clean generation. Now if just Lance could get his own team as well or maybe he could get a job on garmin.
the sceptic said:Good to know the sport is cleaner than ever. Everyone has faith in this new clean generation. Now if just Lance could get his own team as well or maybe he could get a job on garmin.
the sceptic said:Good to know the sport is cleaner than ever. Everyone has faith in this new clean generation. Now if just Lance could get his own team as well or maybe he could get a job on garmin.
hrotha said:I sincerely hope JV knows what he's doing and is only trying to manipulate LA into nuking the UCI. LA is evil, JV. Don't ever forget that.
python said:^^pretty much my assessment too, except i'm done being neutral on jv, his politico-pragmatic side is taking over and it smells.
i seriously doubt that jv is not aware that it's the texas fraud who will try to manipulate the thaw and not the other way around.![]()
“We talk here and there,” Vaughters said. “At the end of the day, I think Lance has got a lot of things to say, which could clarify a whole lot. In terms of the full download on what went on in that era of cycling, he could be big part of the solution, if he chooses to be.
hrotha said:Being toothless doesn't mean he's not evil anymore. Just a few months ago, before he had those teeth extracted and just days before his public "conversion", he was as vicious as ever, which suggests this is just part of his attempt to rehabilitate his public image.
If he is toothless then it does not matter how evil he can be - its all bark.hrotha said:Being toothless doesn't mean he's not evil anymore. Just a few months ago, before he had those teeth extracted and just days before his public "conversion", he was as vicious as ever, which suggests this is just part of his attempt to rehabilitate his public image.
Dr. Maserati said:The point you appear to miss is that the real people he hurt, the Andreus, LeMonds, JVs etc are prepared to hear him.
The general public who were duped and believed the myth will not so forgiving.
hrotha said:A point Dr Vortex seems to be missing is that I didn't say JV shouldn't speak to LA under any circumstances, but rather that the guy's evil and should be approached very carefully.
If you ask me, any negotiations with him should start with "Are you willing to speak to USADA now?", and end immediately afterwards if he said "no".
hrotha said:If you ask me, any negotiations with him should start with "Are you willing to speak to USADA now?", and end immediately afterwards if he said "no".
That does seem impossible.webvan said:Yes this makes no sense, JV is being naive or it's a bizarre mix of being flattered/variation of the Stockholm syndrom, if Armstrong is serious about helping (he isn't) he should talk to Trygart and rid cycling McQuack and Verdrugen...but of course he would run the risk of some more if his actions being uncovered and thus look even worse...as impossible as that seems!
The problem is LA can't be trusted, so he'd better make a massive show of goodwill first.Tyler'sTwin said:Why!?WTH is wrong with attempting to convince LA to co-operate with USADA and takedown the current UCI management? You can't at least try to make him see your way and nudge him towards nuking the UCI? Would that be cheating or what's the problem here?
https://twitter.com/millarmind/status/334699013469253632
David Millar @millarmind 15 May
Who'd a thunk it? All we had to do was ask @ramunas88 to win. @ryder_hesjedal was legendary, first to get bottles and help cover attacks.
python said:@ Dr. M and others with similar opinions.
I only see 2 relevant parties in this particular episode - jv, the self-promoted champion of clean cycling and the king fraud unrepentant doper from texas.
As it is known to the public at large, they, by their own actions and words, stand on the diametrically opposing ends...
One took every opportunity to defend HIS view of clean cycling today whilst the other, took every opportunity to scuttle the usada efforts to get his cooperation on the vision jv claims to share with usada.
To me, either jv is not, genuine, smart enough or is experiencing a 'glitch'.
Through personal observations, i dont think it's the last 2.
Unless armstrong shows a genuine remorse - which is clearly not his idea getting into a do or die legal struggle with the feds - he does not deserve a word with anyone who claims to share usada goals.
This is my strong opinion, doc, and it is fine if we disagree.
ScienceIsCool said:What? How!? Lance goes live on TV and finally tells the whole truth. What happens tomorrow? The same corrupt system rolls on and finds a way to elect McQuaid to another term. It's kind of like Livestrong. What does raising doping awareness get us. We are already *very* aware of how dirty the sport is and who the main villains are.
Who said LAs redemption begins with JV?ScienceIsCool said:I just can't figure out why anyone would think that the road to Lance's redemption begins with Mr. Vaughters. Or that Lance is being persectued beyond what he deserves. That interview was just plain weird. Either Lance is after something or they both are.
John Swanson
glad you inserted 'i would assume'. otherwise, i'd expect the phrase from the least informed poster.maserati said:...The other [armstrong] has only just been exposed to it and I would assume is struggling with it.
python said:glad you inserted 'i would assume'. otherwise, i'd expect the phrase from the least informed poster.
yeah, more than happy to disagree with you too, doc. your overoptimism doc is, that based on the abundance of evidence armstrong never struggled with his guilt - all his 'admissions' were forced by the legal setbacks or his own poor legal advisers. this is all i have the time and desire to say atm.
^agree. any regret from armstrong is being indicted. he does not think he did anything wrong.python said:glad you inserted 'i would assume'. otherwise, i'd expect the phrase from the least informed poster.
yeah, more than happy to disagree with you too, doc. your overoptimism doc is, that based on the abundance of evidence armstrong never struggled with his guilt - all his 'admissions' were forced by the legal setbacks or his own poor legal advisers. this is all i have the time and desire to say atm.
