Originally Posted by blackcat View Post
quote 13, best you edit, you meant to quote me.
no, this was a popula refrain in cyclingnews and cycling media. RE: conversation with legaey, and an intention to dope for results.
it was what was in the media. do a cyclingnews search for vaughters, legeay, conversation, doping.
but dont tell me i am distorting things. if there is a problem with the fuzzy anecdote, it resides with vaughters massaging it, or the reporter/stenographer improperly recording it, but jv let it stand. and as he tells it, it really is not materially different, so i see no reason why he would tell the reporter to redact for accuracy, if he even checked the record.