JV talks, sort of

Page 203 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Sep 9, 2012
5,276
2,490
20,680
Pulpstar said:
Sorry to be nieve here but why would releasing the power data ruin his chances of winning another race ?

Skybots can now analyse it or it show he is doping (I have no idea if it does or not) ? Sorry bit confused here..

I think he was being ironic with regards to Brailsfords comment that he wouldn't really like to publish his riders SRM data.

"There's been a lot of debate about whether we should release power data and SRM data, but there's also a question of interpretation. Believe you me, interpreting power data is not as simple as it seems. We find a lot of variation in the data we collect ourselves and some of it is quite hard to understand, so I think it would have to be done by a panel of experts recognised by everyone as being fair and whose opinion collectively we will buy into.

"I think that would be a positive thing because then you would have people who would interpret data and give an independent, objective view, as against maybe giving the nuances of how we train or what we would consider to be some of our areas of competitive advantage."
 
Jul 3, 2009
18,948
5
22,485
Pulpstar said:
Sorry to be nieve here but why would releasing the power data ruin his chances of winning another race ?

Skybots can now analyse it or it show he is doping (I have no idea if it does or not) ? Sorry bit confused here..

One of the reasons cited for everyone not releasing data is that it would reveal secrets in a rider's performances which would allow others to figure out strategies to defeat them. I can only assume that Movistar do not agree with that view, except that it's probably the reason for showing Stage 9 not Stage 8.

More Strides than Rides said:
His performance on stage 9 was not impressive.

Releasing the power data would only make that more obvious. Not something teams and athletes want

Of course it wasn't impressive, he never went 100% for more than 5 seconds.
 
Aug 29, 2012
1,025
31
10,530
Surely you can't work out much from power data alone. Combine it with Heart rate data and you might giving away 'secrets'.
 
Apr 3, 2009
12,633
8,526
28,180
It's all just noise to distract from the simple truth. Have an independent 3rd party who is responsible for aniti-doping monitor the powermeters and it's a done deal. We don't need to see the data 'till after the race. They need to see it in real-time.

The technology isn't the issue, it's the organizational structure of the sport. But that's not really news I guess...
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Pulpstar said:
Surely you can't work out much from power data alone. Combine it with Heart rate data and you might giving away 'secrets'.

Giving out data wouldn't feed the internet scientists anymore than the 3 blogs working out climbing data.

Brailsford is scared that someone like a Dr Ashenden would be asked to analyse the data by a big media company and then the questions put to them about the data would be legitimate and they would have to prove how they achieved the data without doping and that is impossible for the likes of Froome, Wiggins and Porte.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Benotti69 said:
Giving out data wouldn't feed the internet scientists anymore than the 3 blogs working out climbing data.

Brailsford is scared that someone like a Dr Ashenden would be asked to analyse the data by a big media company and then the questions put to them about the data would be legitimate and they would have to prove how they achieved the data without doping and that is impossible for the likes of Froome, Wiggins and Porte.

In a galaxy far far away there's the results of a test. Switzerland. Aigle. The dawg's numbers under lock and key.

JV said so. Apparently the numbers unlock the secret of the Dawg.

The legend of Dawg.
 
Oct 21, 2012
1,106
0
0
If they're worried about 'internet scientists' jumping to conclusions and defaming them, why not supply their data directly to Ashenden and allow him to publish his findings if he sees something strange?

They have something to hide.
 
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
thehog said:
In a galaxy far far away there's the results of a test. Switzerland. Aigle. The dawg's numbers under lock and key.

JV said so. Apparently the numbers unlock the secret of the Dawg.

The legend of Dawg.
Those 'numbers' are no secret. Movistar has them, Saxo has them, Belkin has them, BMC has them, AG2R, etc etc. Every team with a rider on the foot of the Bonascre knows the score. Why dont they release their data for that stage?

On the other hand, why do you think Movistar has released Valverde's SRM file? Too bad it was for the wrong stage but it is a clear saying: ''we know what you did last saturday''.
 
Jul 11, 2011
8
0
0
In the early days of SRM, some domestiques held a small unit which collected specific SRM data of rival teams. Just pick up their ANT signal and there you have it. Including heart rates, you name it.

I assume that's no longer possible these days, but don't underestimate the data they have in their hands.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
LesCombes said:
In the early days of SRM, some domestiques held a small unit which collected specific SRM data of rival teams. Just pick up their ANT signal and there you have it. Including heart rates, you name it.

I assume that's no longer possible these days, but don't underestimate the data they have in their hands.

Really?

SRM was all wired until a 2008, 20 years after it was founded
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
thehog said:
In a galaxy far far away there's the results of a test. Switzerland. Aigle. The dawg's numbers under lock and key.

JV said so. Apparently the numbers unlock the secret of the Dawg.

The legend of Dawg.

Here's some numbers.

Jonathan Vaughters
RT @ammattipyoraily: @Vaughters Chris Froome: 38 min 22 sec, 22.75 Kph, VAM 1605 m/h, 5.93 W/kg....Once again, 5.9 w/kg.

Paul Jakma
@Vaughters @ammattipyoraily You can't say people are cleaner with these figures, only that, IF there's still doping, they're being clever.

Jonathan Vaughters
@pjakma @ammattipyoraily Being clever by riding more slowly?

Paul Jakma
@Vaughters Yes. By staying plausible. Just a tiny tiny boost over the best "naturals" could be enough. @ammattipyoraily
Details

Jonathan Vaughters
@pjakma @ammattipyoraily Get your point. My point is this: 5.9 is plausible and possible for a highly talented and well trained rider.
 
May 12, 2010
721
1
9,985
Race Radio said:
Yes, really! This is the actual device they were using back in the days (mini antenna not pictured):

tinfoil-hat.jpg
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
So Dan Martin is about 6 minutes behind Froome after one MTF and a short ITT

JV your clean guys are getting destroyed. This is like Armstrong all over again
Please say something more than "i just dont know"
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
the sceptic said:
So Dan Martin is about 6 minutes behind Froome after one MTF and a short ITT

JV your clean guys are getting destroyed. This is like Armstrong all over again
Please say something more than "i just dont know"

JV is happy. He's said that plenty of times.
And why wouldn't he be?
He's the laughing third in all this. Garmin might get their asses kicked on a day like this, but they're getting more than enough wins to keep the sponsors happy. And without raising any eyebrowes. As if Hesjedal 2012 never happened.
 
Mar 15, 2011
2,760
71
11,580
the sceptic said:
So Dan Martin is about 6 minutes behind Froome after one MTF and a short ITT

JV your clean guys are getting destroyed. This is like Armstrong all over again
Please say something more than "i just dont know"

I understand the temptation to call things armstrong-esque lately, but its just not true. We may have one guy 3:30 ahead of the rest, or 6' ahead of the "barometer", but thats just it. One guy in the vanguard. Everyone else is scattered appropriately in the results. Even in a 100% clean peleton, the Dan Martins and Talanskys of the world will be a few minutes off by now, they're just not that good.
 
Feb 10, 2010
10,645
20
22,510
LesCombes said:
... Just pick up their ANT signal and there you have it. Including heart rates, you name it.

Further to Race Radio's comment, nope. Unless you are talking about seeing it in a movie, the communication protocol doesn't work like that.
 
Jul 5, 2009
751
13
10,010
DirtyWorks said:
Further to Race Radio's comment, nope. Unless you are talking about seeing it in a movie, the communication protocol doesn't work like that.

Not to mention the fact that if you have to be close enough to the targeted rider for that contraption to work, what more do you need to know other than you're keeping up with him?
 
Mar 10, 2009
4,707
47
15,530
sniper said:
JV is happy. He's said that plenty of times.
And why wouldn't he be?
He's the laughing third in all this. Garmin might get their asses kicked on a day like this, but they're getting more than enough wins to keep the sponsors happy. And without raising any eyebrowes. As if Hesjedal 2012 never happened.

He didn't seem to be too happy after Ax-3-Domaines...
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Arnout said:
He didn't seem to be too happy after Ax-3-Domaines...

you mean the 'i don't know' tweet?

Ax-3-D was so obvious, 'I don't know' was the diplomatic answer. After all, JV is still looking to retain the anti-doping-crusader label that people have put on him, so he won't be playing the 'let's put the blinders on' game that e.g. david walsh is currently playing.
in terms of politics and PR, JV is unchallenged out there at the moment.

if JV ever admits that doping is still rife, he'd have to explain how his own riders keep coming up with worldclass results (hesjedal 2012, martin 2013) not to mention the light it would shed on wiggo 2009 retrospectively. so my guess is he'll play the 'I'm happy' and 'it's so much cleaner now' cards for years to come and he'll avoid talking about sky as much as possible.
 
Oct 21, 2012
1,106
0
0
There's also the law to consider. If he says anything about Sky then they could Lance him for millions.
 
Aug 5, 2010
11,027
89
22,580
Hey JV is happy his riders win every once in awhile, read when Froome/Sky's A team isn't around, so who cares.