Official Lance Armstrong Thread **READ POST #1 BEFORE POSTING**

Page 387 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 10, 2010
6,285
2
17,485
Dr. Maserati said:
So LA is "almost home free" because.... wait for it, the FDA rarely prosecute?

Hmm, they rarely spend long periods and lots of money investigating too, though, right?

Not just that. It would also exclude a wide array of possible charges--those that don't come within the ambit of the FDA. I suggest that the investigation is broader than just FDA related mattters, and that the Tailwind/Postal contract just might be a relevant document (hardly an original thought) to the broad investigation.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Cobblestoned said:
News ? :D
Looking forward to it. It's going to be another hard month for us fanboys I guess.
No idea ? Beeing married can neutralize even the strongest men.
Some always visit me to cry me a river and then I do some therapy sessions on them. life is good.

So you were an LA hater and are now a fanboy? And are you saying this is related to you becoming weak because you got married?
Sounds like you didn't meet the right person. Thats tough.

Well I hope you are finding confessing all this therapeutic - but rather than clog up this thread you could open a separate thread, perhaps call it Cobbles Couch or something and live out your fantasies there.
 
Sep 5, 2009
1,239
0
0
MarkvW said:
Armstrong didn't invoice anything. Armstrong was a contractual asset of Tailwind. Armstrong had no contractual privity with USPS. The doc is just Tailwind's saying that USPS owes them all that money for the results earned by its contractual asset.

Armstrong invoiced through his management company. Never said that Armstrong had any contract relationship with USPS. USPS does not owe Armstrong anything. Tailwind owes Armstrong, through his management company, additional income for particular performances (stage wins, yellow jersey). Not privy to any contracts but it would appear the additional bonus income was arranged as separate from LA's US Postal Service team's (Tailwind) fixed income.

MarkvW further wrote:
You sure like the idea that the director of a limited liability company is criminally liable for acts performed by agents of the company on behalf of the company--even without the director's knowledge of those acts. If that was the law, there'd be a lot of bank directors in jail right now!

You should have been advising the directors of Enron, WorldCom et al who were held to be civilly and criminally liable

RICO lifts the corporate veil and exposes the directors.
 
Aug 10, 2010
6,285
2
17,485
Race Radio said:
Each year, the FDA OCI investigates about 1,200 criminal cases that result in the arrests of about 300 criminal suspects. From 1993 through November 2010, agents made 5,702 arrests that resulted in 4,748 convictions and more than $11 billion in fines and restitution.

But I am sure they have nothing on Lance. His achievements were fueled by hope, hard work and unicorn tears.

Maybe the investigation has broadened to Lance's restaurants! They've gotta get him for something, because (wait for it) . . .there's an investigation going on!
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
MarkvW said:
Armstrong didn't invoice anything. Armstrong was a contractual asset of Tailwind. Armstrong had no contractual privity with USPS. The doc is just Tailwind's saying that USPS owes them all that money for the results earned by its contractual asset.
A contractual asset of Tailwind..... and a director of Tailwind.
Wow - they are the same names. Tailwind, small world.


MarkvW said:
You sure like the idea that the director of a limited liability company is criminally liable for acts performed by agents of the company on behalf of the company--even without the director's knowledge of those acts. If that was the law, there'd be a lot of bank directors in jail right now!

How many of those "bank directors" were using the funds from their fraud to run a doping network, that they themselves were using?
 
Mar 8, 2010
3,263
1
0
Dr. Maserati said:
When Cobblestoned pretends he is German he makes more sense.



So LA is "almost home free" because.... wait for it, the FDA rarely prosecute?

Hmm, they rarely spend long periods and lots of money investigating too, though, right?

Doc, you have a too strong imagination/fantasy I would say. Sometimes you indicate that.....
Now we have been friends for such a long period, and you still keep on smelling a conspiracy when it comes to my roots and home ? Man......man. :D

Of course I am paid by Lance, and a livestrong specialforces specialagent, division Germany. Of course neither German, nor posting from Germany.
All that other stuff I post here in the CN forum and all that cyclingstuff is just camouflage.

Greetings from the USS Armstrong
(by morse code, proxy and through some hidden VPNs)

buh

PS: I guess now I have to prove that I am German. What would satisfy you, Doc ?
 

Polish

BANNED
Mar 11, 2009
3,853
1
0
MarkvW said:
Maybe the investigation has broadened to Lance's restaurants! They've gotta get him for something, because (wait for it) . . .there's an investigation going on!

The weiners at LiveStrong Stadium contain chicken beaks?
Yuck:( But at the same time yummy mmmm:)
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Cobblestoned said:
Doc, you have a too strong imagination/fantasy I would say. Sometimes you indicate that.....
Now we have been friends for such a long period, and you still keep on smelling a conspiracy when it comes to my roots and home ? Man......man. :D

Of course I am paid by Lance, and a livestrong specialforces specialagent, division Germany. Of course neither German, nor posting from Germany.
All that other stuff I post here in the CN forum and all that cyclingstuff is just camouflage.

Greetings from the USS Armstrong
(by morse code, proxy and through some hidden VPNs)

buh

PS: I guess now I have to prove that I am German. What would satisfy you, Doc ?

I don't know what the German is for this, but go troll someone else.
 
Aug 10, 2010
6,285
2
17,485
Dr. Maserati said:
A contractual asset of Tailwind..... and a director of Tailwind.
Wow - they are the same names. Tailwind, small world.




How many of those "bank directors" were using the funds from their fraud to run a doping network, that they themselves were using?

Does the FDA investigate that?
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
MarkvW said:
Does the FDA investigate that?

No Mark - they investigate drugs, thats what the D in FDA stands for.

There are a number of cases- and I know you like to jump from one to the other, so lets assist you.
Floyd has a case about the USPS sponsorship. Tailwind will be involved with that.

The FDA (D is for drugs) are investigating the drugs, its part of their remit. Because they are Federal they have broad powers, they have badges and stuff.
They will not care about USPS but they will care about Tailwind as they were the company with the money.

Then there is the USADA - but it might be a bit much for you.
 
Mar 8, 2010
3,263
1
0
Dr. Maserati said:
So you were an LA hater and are now a fanboy? And are you saying this is related to you becoming weak because you got married?
Sounds like you didn't meet the right person. Thats tough.

Well I hope you are finding confessing all this therapeutic - but rather than clog up this thread you could open a separate thread, perhaps call it Cobbles Couch or something and live out your fantasies there.

Well its CN clinic automatism, that you are a fanboy when your hate is not strong enough.
Right now, hate would be the wrong word.
I hated Lance a little bit, mainly because I was pulling for Jan of course.
Lance was opponent, but not target. Not to compare with first class haters around here.
Would have never wished the man to be hurt or laugh about his mom, and such things you know....

So far I could AVOID the neutralisation, you know. All the girls, they are still standing outside in the cold, in a row, waiting for me, autographs, bussies etc....
Exceptions may prove the rule. Happy when you are still happy, but neutralized.
I guess it's not your strongest day today, Doc.
One can't misunderstand so many things in a few minutes.

Now you are on the losing street and start calling me a troll after some desperate insult-attempts and asking my existence.
We'll just leave it like this, trolldoc. :)
 
Sep 5, 2009
1,239
0
0
MarkvW said:
<snip> ......You sure like the idea that the director of a limited liability company is criminally liable for acts performed by agents of the company on behalf of the company--even without the director's knowledge of those acts. If that was the law, there'd be a lot of bank directors in jail right now!

As an addendum to my previous post.

Check on insider trading convictions. Some individual perpetrators went to great lengths to hide their trades in offshore corporations and trusts. But the SEC still got them as individuals.

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged brothers Samuel E. Wyly and Charles J. Wyly, Jr. of Dallas with violating federal securities laws governing ownership and trading of securities by corporate insiders. The Wyly brothers reaped more than $550 million in undisclosed gains while sitting on corporate boards by trading stock in those public companies through hidden entities located in foreign jurisdictions to conceal their ownership and trading of those securities.

A director of a corporation cannot hide behind lack of knowledge as a defense. It is a dereliction of duty (breach of fiduciary duty) by a director not to be conversant with or make himself/herself conversant with any matter brought before the Board of Directors.
 
Aug 10, 2010
6,285
2
17,485
Dr. Maserati said:
No Mark - they investigate drugs, thats what the D in FDA stands for.

There are a number of cases- and I know you like to jump from one to the other, so lets assist you.
Floyd has a case about the USPS sponsorship. Tailwind will be involved with that.

The FDA (D is for drugs) are investigating the drugs, its part of their remit. Because they are Federal they have broad powers, they have badges and stuff.
They will not care about USPS but they will care about Tailwind as they were the company with the money.

Then there is the USADA - but it might be a bit much for you.

No point in being sarcastically disingenuous. I'm only talking about criminal anyway.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
MarkvW said:
No point in being sarcastically disingenuous. I'm only talking about criminal anyway.

You are only talking about criminal? And you call me "disingenuous"?

Then why bring up the USPS docs and Tailwind? No-one suggested it was criminal except yourself, and then you spent the last 30ish posts proving that it couldn't be criminal.

I told you that it was irrelevant hours ago.

Dr. Maserati said:
No, not inaccurate, just irrelevant.
Why would it matter when USPS updated or amended a contract to a Federal investigation being done by the FDA?
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Dr. Maserati said:
So you were an LA hater and are now a fanboy And are you saying this is related to you becoming weak because you got married?
Sounds like you didn't meet the right person. Thats tough.

Well I hope you are finding confessing all this therapeutic - but rather than clog up this thread you could open a separate thread, perhaps call it Cobbles Couch or something and live out your fantasies there.

Seriously Dr M. this is too far. Leave wives & family out.

Mods can you delete?

This is in such bad taste it's offensive. I know CS can defend himself but we're not here to be abused like this.

Dr. M do the right think and delete it yourself.
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
thehog said:
Seriously Dr M. this is too far. Leave wives & family out.

Mods can you delete?

This is in such bad taste it's offensive. I know CS can defend himself but we're not here to be abused like this.

Dr. M do the right think and delete it yourself.
a texas lover from a faraway germany finds himself defended by the north american texas hater...personally i think this is extraordinary. and i do see the hogg's point....
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
thehog said:
Seriously Dr M. this is too far. Leave wives & family out.

Mods can you delete?

This is in such bad taste it's offensive. I know CS can defend himself but we're not here to be abused like this.

Dr. M do the right think and delete it yourself.
Why?
Cobbles is as married as you are German.

If you wish to make a complaint then hit the report button - you might draw attention to the irrelevant discussion that Cobbles brought up too.


And seriously, you are in no position to talk about "wives and family" when you post photos of LS & TH's ex-wife, or did you forget about that?


Its very simple - if you guys want to push hard, I have no problem pushing back. But don't go off crying off when you end up on your ass.
I don't start things, I end things, deal with it or shut up.
 
Feb 4, 2010
547
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
I don't start things, I end things.

Just when you think the LA thread is getting stale and posts about LA's wives, girlfriends and even mother run their course, jewels like this come along. How'd of thunk one bicycle racer could inspire such illuminated discourse?

2000 pages should be no problem. :)
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
9000ft said:
Just when you think the LA thread is getting stale and posts about LA's wives, girlfriends and even mother run their course, jewels like this come along. How'd of thunk one bicycle racer could inspire such illuminated discourse?

2000 pages should be no problem. :)

I agree - especially when 10% of your posts are on this very thread to tell us that you don't care and are only here for the entertainment.

As you say who'd athunk a bike racer could get someone to post so much about something he doesn't care about.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Dr. Maserati said:
Why?
Cobbles is as married as you are German.

If you wish to make a complaint then hit the report button - you might draw attention to the irrelevant discussion that Cobbles brought up too.


And seriously, you are in no position to talk about "wives and family" when you post photos of LS & TH's ex-wife, or did you forget about that?


Its very simple - if you guys want to push hard, I have no problem pushing back. But don't go off crying off when you end up on your ass.
I don't start things, I end things, deal with it or shut up.

I think you've embarrassed yourself enough.

Back away from the keyboard and cool off. it's the best for the thread & forum has a whole.

Let it go on this one. The audience has spoken. We don't mind a firey debate but you've gone too far this time around.

Cheers.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
thehog said:
I think you've embarrassed yourself enough.

Back away from the keyboard and cool off. it's the best for the thread & forum has a whole.

Let it go on this one. The audience has spoken. We don't mind a firey debate but you've gone too far this time around.

Cheers.

Thank you Hog - I will take your advice the same way I take your predictions and insider information ie ignore it as mindless twaddle.
 
Jul 3, 2009
18,948
5
22,485
I have purged a recent discussion which was little more than personal bickering. When the thread deviates down such paths, its usefulness to the wider readership is diminished. Posters need to take the initiative and walk away from a discussion, or use PMs if they feel they are stretching the boundaries of what is reasonable. If posters cannot do this then there will be more moderator interventions, and ultimately warnings to those who consistently lead the thread astray.

Again, I remind all of what was said only a week ago:

Francois the Postman said:
OK people, excuses for having closed this thread, but given the speed with which this thread kept throwing up posts that inflamed the situation more, the poor responsive by some to bite their tongue a bit whilst moderators were dealing with the various issues raised, and the misjudgements about what mods were or weren't doing, or condoning... buying some time to read 550 posts in peace, trying to judge how appropriate they were, within context, became the only manageable option from our end of the looking glass.

I tried to restore the thread by leaving only the content that was on topic, and addressing post rather than poster. I also tried to keep on topic argumentations intact as much a possible, and leave a discussion thread without "posting" holes.

More than one third of those posts have disappeared. A proportion of those didn't break any rules as such, or not in a way that would normally prompt us to intervene. Most did have issues though. Still, several of them were responses to posts that would have no place here because they were

a) off topic, and/or
b) breaking rules about how to conduct yourself here

and became part of the big purge. So even if your post went, it doesn't mean we disapproved of your post per se.

I'm not perfect, I probably have removed posts that could have remained, and left some post where there are certainly good arguments to have purged those too, in the context of what went. Trying to leave a thread that made sense complicated things a bit as well.

Also, if posts remained, it doesn't mean

a) the opinion expressed is one that the mods share or condone
b) we always like the tone of attitude taken
c) we feel that a particular discussion strand between users couldn't have taken up a lot less space and avoided fisking, or should have been taken to pms at some point.
d) we think the poster is a model poster

It means I had to make black or white calls in an ocean of grey stuff. People on all sides tend to have points that are worth making, or at least as worthy of making again as some of the counter-issues raised again. The deeper your point was buried in a post that we judge to be condescending or insulting, disrespectful of the poster you are addressing, the more likely a post was to disappear, even ifI agreed with the point made. We have a long history of saying that you can say a lot here, but it matters how you do it. We rarely gut a thread the way I did it here, but in this train-wreck that appeared over the last few days, I make no excuses for doing so. We tend to condone a bit more in this thread as people tend to be a bit animated about this issue than some others, but in the end it is still a thread that has a function too: be informative, an area for genuine discussion, engagement, and for entertainment (of sorts). Plus the rules still apply to this thread too.

Posts and discussion strands that went were flying in the face of that, or focussed on something that flew in the face of that.

I have not have time to deal with all aspects of the thread, and issues raised, nor contact all the people I intend to. That will happen shortly, as soon as I can.

I don't want to keep the thread locked until I have had time to dot all i's though. So I will be releasing the thread now.


A few rules that are in force anyway, but will be applied strictly for the foreseeable future in this thread in particular:


- address post not poster. Deal with issues, not how legit you feel a poster is, etc.
- don't raise issues or strands that have disappeared. PM where applicable, or bite your tongue. We are trying to move on and get the thread back on topic.
- don't raise issues about my intervention here in this thread . Use the "about the forum" section or pm. I or the other mods will try to address any issues raised there as best as I can, the moment I can.
- accept that people can look at the same issues and come to different conclusion, or can honestly hold a position that appears to fly in the face of some facts, or make assumptions or have expectations that don't match yours. That is allowed. People are welcome to post honestly held opinions, respectful and on topic. People are even allowed to raise things raised before, or refuted before. It doesn't mean you can slam a poster for doing so. If you feel you need to respond, address their points, or report their post to us if you feel a poster is not posting genuinely held opinions, or trolling. No individual poster is to take it upon themselves to bully another poster from this forum.
- if you can't raise your problem with another post within the constraints set out in the rules and guidelines, don't post. Report or ignore are the only two options that won't get you into trouble.
- don't assume that because you can't see any action taken, it isn't taking place, or isn't forthcoming. And certainly don't take that as a cue to make sure you will do "it" for us any way you see fit.

There are probably an infinite amount of ways to address the situation here better than I have chosen to do. What I have done I have tried to be as fair as I could, and as dispassionate as I could. Like all the mods, I am hoping to spend my time with family and friends over the coming days. If we find ourselves called back to this thread over the coming days, or any other, over and over, don't be surprised if we make sure that we won't be coming back to the same issue or poster, for a few days. I hate to take this tone with you guys, all the more as we went through a whole spell of the forum running itself nicely. Here it derailed itself in a way that we won't tolerate.

This is a red line in the sand. Heed it.

Over to you guys...

...and hope you have a great time with friends and family over the coming days. At home, or here on the forum.
 
Dec 23, 2011
691
0
9,580
Ferminal said:
I have purged a recent discussion which was little more than personal bickering. When the thread deviates down such paths, its usefulness to the wider readership is diminished.

Hear hear! I love the immense amount of knowledge that people on here have at their disposal, and would hate to lose some members or have threads closed because of personal issues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.