i dont disagree with anything you say, but i happen to get behind him as hes british, and there arent a massive amount to get behind. but would you be happy to see him out of the sport?Libertine Seguros said:The question then has to be, why is Cavendish somebody you can get behind? The guy has shown time and again that he's a douche. He's a hugely talented douche, but a douche nonetheless. His arrogant statements and demeanour are marketable but also make him hugely punchable, much like Ricardo Riccò before him. As a result, people want to see him get his comeuppance, because nobody likes a shithead. And because of his past behaviour (towards Rooijakkers, for example) when hearsay such as this is reported, people immediately believe it because it's plausible coming from him - just the same as when the head of the Italian cycling authority said that Valverde was linked to Humanplasma many on the board jumped on the bandwagon even though there was no evidence and still remains none to link him to it. Because we know it's in their character.
Plus, when the same team win every single bunch sprint, it gets pretty goddamn boring. Therefore I will root against Cavendish every time, nothing to do with him as a person, but because I want somebody to be able to beat him, because the only good thing about a bunch sprint is unpredictability, which the Columbia train and Cavendish's dominance last year took away.
If you're one of those people who see Cav as somebody to get behind solely because he just happens to be born on the same island as you (or at least one very close to the one you're from) then I can't be bothered to discuss it with you though.
I can appreciate a well-orchestrated lead out and, yes it does get boring. Other teams are now coming up to speed and this crash could be seen as Cav's tactical response to vulnerability and the inevitability that he will get beaten. He can talk trash and gesture after the line all he wants but if he is spitting and chopping riders his DS needs to have an intervention or someone else will do it. He's crossed the line.Libertine Seguros said:Plus, when the same team win every single bunch sprint, it gets pretty goddamn boring. Therefore I will root against Cavendish every time, nothing to do with him as a person, but because I want somebody to be able to beat him, because the only good thing about a bunch sprint is unpredictability, which the Columbia train and Cavendish's dominance last year took away.
If you're one of those people who see Cav as somebody to get behind solely because he just happens to be born on the same island as you (or at least one very close to the one you're from) then I can't be bothered to discuss it with you though.
And that is absolutely fair comment. It's fine to get in behind and support riders from your home country, but don't get blinded by their dangerous riding and bulls$%t antics.Libertine Seguros said:If you're one of those people who see Cav as somebody to get behind solely because he just happens to be born on the same island as you (or at least one very close to the one you're from) then I can't be bothered to discuss it with you though.
Cav must be able to spit a heck of a long way if he managed to spit at HH whilst laying on the ground with a AG2R rider & a couple of bikes on top of him whilst HH is being helped away. Once the tangle of bodies & machines were cleared away he was helped away along the barriers & then back to the bus by team mates. So far no one has actually said they witnessed this incident.tgsgirl said:He was too busy being in agony?
![]()
but no, it wasnt as dangerous as you or everyone is saying thats my point! cav was at fault yes, but not completely at fault. ciolek and haussler did contribute (albeit only slightly)Night Rider said:And that is absolutely fair comment. It's fine to get in behind and support riders from your home country, but don't get blinded by their dangerous riding and bulls$%t antics.
Anyone thinking Cavendish was even remotely in the right in all of this are way off base, the riders don't protest en masse against an individual rider for nothing, race juries don't hand out penalties for nothing, and the weight of opinion against Cav from seasoned old pros and commentators saying he was dangerous doesn't happen just because some fans don't like him.
What has been said, has been said because he was fkn dangerous.
Exactly. This was obviously the talk of the dinner tables last night, together with the spitting. Now, I recall protests at a start but NEVER against a particular rider. I look forward to the next sprint he is in (and will likely win) and the classy get it up you response. He is a complete .....Night Rider said:And that is absolutely fair comment. It's fine to get in behind and support riders from your home country, but don't get blinded by their dangerous riding and bulls$%t antics.
Anyone thinking Cavendish was even remotely in the right in all of this are way off base, the riders don't protest en masse against an individual rider for nothing, race juries don't hand out penalties for nothing, and the weight of opinion against Cav from seasoned old pros and commentators saying he was dangerous doesn't happen just because some fans don't like him.
What has been said, has been said because he was fkn dangerous.
What's on the front page? McEwen said he didn't see Cavendish spitting.Barrus said:
that's all the spitting in that article..."The one minute delay at the start today was a signal from his peers that what happened yesterday, the spitting incident after the crash in particular, is not acceptable and I'm sure he understands the message."
Hey fanboy, do you bother to read a post before your ranting? Do you feel the same about the price of rice in China?flicker said:Just for the record do you feel the same about Paolo Betini running Stuart O Grady into the barriers, or any of the chaps who have taken out Chris Horner, or how Mckewen uses his body and head like a boa constrictor to impede his competitors. Where do yo draw the line or is it just an issue with Cavendish?
This is all true, and much is also the reason why the forum are vilifying him.stefrees said:but its still hearsay. there is a big concerted effort by other riders, fans AND the press to vilify cav, hes had a pretty bad 9 months - brother in jail, split up with long term fiance, health problems, and this week his grandmother died. i get the impression a lot in the sport want rid of him. hes someone who has really got interest of cycling up in the uk, he speaks his mind against doping (still very little do-hes villified for this yet omerta still exists) and hes an excellent sprinter. i find it genuinely sad that someone as a british cycling fan that someone who i can get behind is being villified-yes hes made mistakes but they dont warrant the abuse hes receiving
During the 2009 Giro the Peloton neutralized a stage because of "unsafe course conditions." I don't see this protest any different except applicable to a rider.Ferminal said:I think the protest is silly, but pretty much all "peloton protests" in cycling are based on rubbish.
For me it just shows the level of contempt for Cavendish amongst his fellow professionals.
People do lots of things that are not made acceptable merely by their doing them. I have been on the receiving end of this sort of activity, but only once. I'm a firm beleiver in giving kharma a helping hand.flicker said:Go try some amatuer (sic) races that is what sprinters do. That is the game.
you gotta be the most gullible individual on this board to believe Cav is clean. His head has grown about 3 sizes in two seasons. Guy is on the FULL program and some.stefrees said:but its still hearsay. there is a big concerted effort by other riders, fans AND the press to vilify cav, hes had a pretty bad 9 months - brother in jail, split up with long term fiance, health problems, and this week his grandmother died. i get the impression a lot in the sport want rid of him. hes someone who has really got interest of cycling up in the uk, he speaks his mind against doping (still very little do-hes villified for this yet omerta still exists) and hes an excellent sprinter. i find it genuinely sad that someone as a british cycling fan that someone who i can get behind is being villified-yes hes made mistakes but they dont warrant the abuse hes receiving
Fixed it for you. You're welcome.flicker said:Just for the record do you feel the same about Paolo Betini running Baden Cooke into the barriers, or any of the chaps who have taken out Chris Horner, or how Mckewen uses his body and head like a boa constrictor to impede his competitors. Where do yo draw the line or is it just an issue with Cavendish?
Today? That would be a nice trick. Or was he talking about yesterday?richwagmn said:A bit off topic...
Anyone watch the Tour de Suisse coverage today on Versus? Did you notice Sherwin didn't mention the protest or the fine or Cavendish spitting. As a matter of fact he felt it necessary to point out that Cavendish is probably angry about the crash and might very well win today.
All I can say is come race in Italy with that attitude and do what Cav did. The next race you will be "accidentally" run off the road into a ditch at 50K per hour.flicker said:I think Cavendish and Haussler were wrong. Cav. slowed and cut over, Haussler accelerated and elbowed and hit Cav.
If you are a pro, you need to expect it. If you can't take the heat ramp it up and drop those dangerous guys.
Otherwise ride 2 hundred feet back you will still get the same time. The protesters are wooses and whiners.
Amen, buddha. The road is a nice place for equalization.rata de sentina said:People do lots of things that are not made acceptable merely by their doing them. I have been on the receiving end of this sort of activity, but only once. I'm a firm beleiver in giving kharma a helping hand.