kurtinsc said:I think you are mistaken in thinking Pereiro was a top climber in 2005.
Other then his breakaway's in stage 15, 16 and 19 (which got him a 2nd to Hincapie, a win and 4th place), he did very little in the mountains. He was finishing back with Boogerd, Philipe Gilbert... and yes Hincapie on those stages where he didn't attack early.
People see Periero's win in 2006 and think he was a top level climber. He really wasn't. He was an adequate climber (better then Hincapie for sure, but not anywhere near the Cadel Evans/Levi Leipheimer/Denis Menchov class) who got 30 minutes on a stage because he wasn't viewed as a real threat and managed to hold on (after Landis got DQ'd).
Hincapies win was no different then Gerrans' win in 2008. Egoi Martinez and Pererio are comparable when it comes to climbing ability.
i would say hincapie and pereiro are adequate climbers but not your traditional mountain goat. hincapie can motor on the flats as well as uphill. gerrans is not a climber. martinez made a big mistake not to drop him and because gerrans has a decent kick in the sprint he won. also the first climb was a long way from the prato nevoso climb. it has a big flat in it so nothing too hard. the prato nevoso climb was 8km so quite short and if it was longer gerrans was gone. gerrans is no climber.