Dear Wiggo said:
The graph of a rider who
only doped in 2003/4:
I wonder, out loud, is this what JV had in mind when he recently stated that it would become very clear (soon?) that Ryder had not doped for the Giro?
Not saying that he did, and hoping that he didn't, I do have a couple of nits to pick based upon this article.
1. Phonak
“It was the same thing at Phonak. They had their guys who mattered, and everybody else was just filler.
“A lot of people say, ‘You had to dope just to be there.’ That’s not the case. I could do my job.”
Was he really just filler? He gave some pretty impressive support to doping Floyd in the Dauphine.
2. 2003 MTB World's Silver
"Not true — but he was dirty when he won silver at that 2003 world championship.
The guys who won gold and bronze later got booted out for doping, too."
WHOA. Hold on a minute.
Ryder's palmares still include that silver medal.
Shouldn't he be apologizing and returning that medal?
That he hasn't returned that medal doesn't add up.
“...Is it significant that I crossed that line and doped? Certainly.”
"But ultimately, he says, it (doping) had no bearing on what he later accomplished.
“Those rides have been done the right way. …
I’m proud of that. I hope people understand and believe that.” ..."
It might be easier for people to understand and believe this if he returned tainted or otherwise ill-gotten gains. Otherwise, we are to believe that he remains "proud of that" doping win as well, thus diminishing whatever he says about 'clean' wins.
Just saying.
Dave.