Ryders crash -motor?

Page 9 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
the movement of the bike looks like what might happen under gravity on the steeply banked track of a velodrome. its hard to see how it could happen on that piece of road unless its a lot less level then it appears
 
Geraint Too Fast said:
Apple_falling.gif


If you look really closely, you can see a motor in the apple!

haha good one :D
 
Not to add any fuel to the fire, but after about 10 seconds on google I found this:

http://www.reefbikes.com.au/invisitron-r1-electric-bike-carbon-road-racing/

This may have been presented before, but it at least adds some credibility to the fact that it's possible.

That's not to say that I think this is what has happened in this case, or that I think that the pro peloton are using bike doping, but the fact that this is now commercially and readily available leads me to conclude that with the budgets of pro teams, that a beefed up version of this would be very easily possible. Once again, not saying that I think this is what is happening, just that it definitely shouldn't be mocked as much as it is.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
Archibald said:
As for Ryder's expectation, who knows on that one...
Ryder is all over the place trying to gather his bike. Walks to the right, only to find out his bike is about to spin all the way to the left.
He didn't see 'it' coming.
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
cycloscosmos comments on it

Bit of a weird moment in yesterday’s Vuelta stage—after Ryder’s crash, his bike appears to be spun in a circle by its rear wheel.

Shades of "motorized doping", perhaps—but it’s important to note that the device RAI profiled back in 2010 added watts by actually turning the cranks. Hesjedal’s aren’t turning here.

My guess would be the rear wheel kept spinning as he slid out, and still had enough energy to rotate the bike when it came back in touch with the ground.

Plenty of other reasons why a motor wouldn’t really work here, but I don’t want to act like this is a theory that needs to be debunked. It sure does look weird, though.

http://cyclocosm.tumblr.com/
 
sniper said:
the bolded is the core of the matter.
sceptics like hrotha, hitch and mewmewmew should have an extra look at that moment and then wonder if there'd be enough natural spin left in the rear wheel for it to turn the bike like that.
We sceptics aknowledge we don't have the training or the education to be suspicious every time something weird happens, because freak occurrences are a fact of life and have a perfectly normal, scientific explanation. I see Hesjedal's bike doing a funny thing, but I don't see any reason to believe it's due to a motor.
 
I just experimented with my bike in a similar position on the road to Hesjedal's and i simply cannot believe it could possibly have moved like that due to a spinning rear wheel (i also dont think it would have still been spinning due to the contact with the ground for what looks like a good second or so). Like i said before, it looks like the sort of motion you'd maybe see under gravity on a steeply banked velodrome but very hard to see how it would happen on this fairly flat road...
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
And they xray downtubes, not rear wheel hubs.

And there's enough pawls and metal bits in a rear hub that you'd not necessarily see it, even if you could reliably xray it.

Does this explain Froome's seated accelerations? And his belief that his victory will stand the test of time coz the doping was mechanical?
 
Cycle Chic said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=G1G1ciUlLEY

from the link posted earlier....one of the videos is interesting

THE REAR WHEEL - High Torque Performance - thats the speed which Ryders wheel was spinning and recoiling.

http://www.reefbikes.com.au/invisitron-r1-electric-bike-carbon-road-racing/

Invisitron R1 Electric bike

Woah. Didn't make it to the video section, but THAT is interesting...

Still not leaning one way or the other, but those dismissing this as easily as they are would be well served having a watch of that YouTube link.

One thing I'm certain of in cycling is that if someone thinks they can get away with something, they'll give it a go...
 
Energy density of the power source is the biggest issue.

A good number for estimating that is about 300 Wh/Kg. (with some leeway) There are some higher numbers available, but not likely to be used in this sort of application

A brushless DC motor may hit 90% efficiency, but mid-high 80's is more likely. They can be pretty compact.



I don't think it was happening with Ryder, it looked to me like gravity was the key.



Mechanical doping is a huge risk for a team, as it would have to be done with the teams knowledge and consent. If found out they could easily lose their license.
 
Oct 17, 2011
1,315
0
0
heart_attack_man said:
Woah. Didn't make it to the video section, but THAT is interesting...

Still not leaning one way or the other, but those dismissing this as easily as they are would be well served having a watch of that YouTube link.

One thing I'm certain of in cycling is that if someone thinks they can get away with something, they'll give it a go...

Di Luca already confirmed motors have been used for a few years already.
Cycling is crazy everything is possible :cool:
 
Catwhoorg said:
Mechanical doping is a huge risk for a team, as it would have to be done with the teams knowledge and consent. If found out they could easily lose their license.

I agree. Trememdously risky for a team and it would not be so simple as to point the finger at an individual (and then fire them from the team) since they share equipment and a lot of support people would have to be involved.

That YouTube clip of the hub is interesting. A motor like that would provide plenty of energy savings over a 200+km course. I'm sure we'll be seeing them at Gran Fondos and the Master's racing scene soon, if they aren't there already!
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
kingjr said:
11kg, and makes too much noise.

What noise? You can't be serious? The first video sounds no different to cranking up the speed - and that's in a studio. Add wind noise of 30-90km/hr and you'll hear nothing.
 
The clinic is in full *** mode...which isn't anything out of the usual I know.

But, the rear wheel was spinning, causing a gyroscopic effect, as well as it being a steep downhill, and the bike was partially balanced on the pedal, making it easy for the bike to rotate...

Gheez...
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Freddythefrog said:
I don't see that bike turning on its own and a bit more important than my opinion of a few seconds of vid, neither do Ryder or the motorcyclist and they were the closest ones to the event.

Granville57 said:
Not sure how you're arriving at that conclusion. :confused:

Archibald said:
you sure?
I'd say the moto didn't expect it to rotate round in front of him othewise he'd have swerved to miss it, no?
I would agree with that. I'm just confused as to why Freddy feels that the moto driver and Hesjedal "don't see that bike turning on its own."

As in "they didn't anticipate it"? (which I would agree with)

Or "they didn't witness it." The implication being (I thought) that had the moto driver witnessed it (or at least noticed what was happening), he may have made a statement afterwards or some such thing (even though in real time, this whole thing would've transpired rather quickly).

Maybe Freddythefrog could clarify exactly what he meant. I think there's just a simple misunderstanding of each other going on here.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
Catwhoorg said:
Mechanical doping is a huge risk for a team, as it would have to be done with the teams knowledge and consent. If found out they could easily lose their license.

I've said this before, but I feel very strongly that if anyone were ever found to be mechanically doping their bike in the pro peloton, there would have to be lifetime bans for rider, mechanic and DS. No way such a thing could take place without the knowledge of at least those three people. No way.

It would be such an egregious distortion of the sport, so thoroughly premeditated and with such a high degree of complicity among such a trio (if not more people), that it would have to result in lifetime bans.

Otherwise, what would be the point of any rules whatsoever?

Bike doping = the worst of the cheating offenses.
 
Jul 10, 2010
2,906
1
0
DominicDecoco said:
Oh, dear.. How is this even a thread..

My sentiments exactly. Well, I guess some people find their April Fool fun any time of year they can manage to find it. 'Cause one thing for sure - it's either a fool's errand, or humor. I won't make any bets either way, although I do see some posts I could make a solid wager on the humor side.

My vote in the poll went for "Aliens abducted Ryder's bike and replaced it with a duplicate".

Because there wasn't a Vino option.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
hiero2 said:
it's either a fool's errand, or humor.
Or maybe it's really more mundane underneath it all.


sniper said:
cycloscosmos comments on it
It sure does look weird, though.
hrotha said:
I see Hesjedal's bike doing a funny thing...


It really is that simple. It's an odd occurrence, even to the more level-headed folks like Cosmo and hrotha. It's worth discussing. Simple.
 
Bontie said:
I found this article, no news there, but the comments below was pretty interesting.

http://cyclingmagazine.ca/sections/...al-crashes-dash-stage-win-hopes-comes-runner/

Commentator notes: So when I saw the crash live something struck my eye as peculiar with Ryder's bike when it was on the deck just prior to the motorbike running over the back wheel...so I went back and watched it again in slow motion....
This is what I see...his bike is completely 100% stopped...no movement....somehow his bike begins moving in a semi-circle and accelerates in that motion until it is run over by the camera bike!!!!! What?? this is absolutely impossible without some sort of artificial propulsion!!!

Video here : http://www.steephill.tv/players/you...hboard=vuelta-a-espana&id=OBvgUBpJSkk&yr=2014

I am no physicist and have no idea about these things, but it does look odd, or am I being clinic cycnic?
No wonder he crashed since he apparently put his motor in reverse :rolleyes: