- May 20, 2009
- 8,934
- 7
- 17,495
There he is:cineteq said:Cavendish, Ferrari, Phinney, Hunter safe within the time limit...but where's Guardini?![]()
163 GUARDINI Andrea ITA FAR +46:44
There he is:cineteq said:Cavendish, Ferrari, Phinney, Hunter safe within the time limit...but where's Guardini?![]()
cineteq said:There he is:
163 GUARDINI Andrea ITA FAR +46:44
cineteq said:There he is:
163 GUARDINI Andrea ITA FAR +46:44
Zinoviev Letter said:Another guy showing some balls. He can't climb at all and he's in his first Grand Tour, but he's hauling his carcass over the mountains and won his stage as a result.
Bernie's eyesore said:Lucky he gained so much time by going in the break.
hrotha said:Of course he was allowed to go. The point is he had the strength to go. He had it all along, but today he simply wasn't afraid of losing his sweet 6th place or whatever, so he went. My point is not that the attack stuck, but that he could have tried at any time, and not without chances of success.
Froome19 said:Once again, what more could these riders (Basso, Scarponi, Purito and Pozzovivo) have done today?
hrotha said:Guys, did you see Kreuziger today? Because he was a GC contender just two days ago, and suddenly today he could up the ante. It's not a matter of strength, but of balls.
Purito agrees with us:DirtyWorks said:You seem to forget that there is a finite amount of attacking that can be done. A bigger attack today, if possible, will be paid 2x back tomorrow. The efforts for the win today will make tomorrow much harder.
And you guys seem to think you can only move if you're the strongest. That's not the case. That's where tactics come in, but nowadays people can only think of one tactic: wait for the last climb, and go. I think it's funny that so many forumers are making the same mistake they so often deride the Schlecks for.DirtyWorks said:You seem to forget that there is a finite amount of attacking that can be done. A bigger attack today, if possible, will be paid 2x back tomorrow. The efforts for the win today will make tomorrow much harder.
He clearly didn't have the strength all along otherwise he'd have finished better on some stages. Some days the legs are good and then there's the bad days. There's no reasoning. It just is.
hrotha said:And you guys seem to think you can only move if you're the strongest. That's not the case. That's where tactics come in, but nowadays people can only think of one tactic: wait for the last climb, and go. I think it's funny that so many forumers are making the same mistake they so often deride the Schlecks for.
Basso and Scarponi, unlike Rodriguez, left their potential attacks until the final week, and now they're paying the price.Dutchsmurf said:You act like riders like Basso and Scarponi could easily win this Giro if they just tried harder. Well I can tell you, they are trying hard. They are just not good enough.
hrotha said:And you guys seem to think you can only move if you're the strongest. That's not the case. That's where tactics come in, but nowadays people can only think of one tactic: wait for the last climb, and go. I think it's funny that so many forumers are making the same mistake they so often deride the Schlecks for.
Dutchsmurf said:Are you serious? He started the last climb with a 2 minute advantage and only barely won it. If he was still a GC contender he would have finished 2 minutes behind. He didn't have the strength 2 days ago and he still didn't today. Sure he could have tried winning a stage earlier, but someone would have reacted to his attack then. After losing so much time, nobody cared anymore, so he got a free ride.
You act like riders like Basso and Scarponi could easily win this Giro if they just tried harder. Well I can tell you, they are trying hard. They are just not good enough. Ryder is simply the strongest rider in this Giro and I highly doubt he will lose any time tomorrow. I actually wouldn't be surprise if he starts the ITT in pink. You can shout at your screen "grow some balls and attack" and if they had the legs, they would. But their legs are protesting harder than you are shouting at your screen.
Froome19 said:He attacked hard to bridge the gap to the break and he was working much more than the other riders, in the wind constantly before the climb.
He would have possibly lost some time but you cant compare riders who decide to poke their head out for the last 3km and what Kreuziger did today.
Or do you really think that Andy Schleck would have lost 2min on Galibier to Voeckler?
I don't think they're making the race hard from afar. If that were the case, we wouldn't be seeing gargantuan groups making it over the mountains, and less than spectacular breakaways going so far in such hard stages. I actually think when people seee all of Liquigas on the front they assume they must be drilling it hard, but the evidence says otherwise. The first 15 guys or so in every stage (and they have been monster stages) were very close. There were barely any gaps. That doesn't scream "hard racing" to me.Dutchsmurf said:And what other tactic do you suggest? Attacking earlier? And who do you suggest should try that? Basso who can't accelerate if his life depends on it? Scarponi who just isn't strong enough? Rodriguez who can't do any long lasting attacks? Uran who is happy to not get dropped?
Or maybe not attack earlier, but make the race harder. Like what we saw today? Everyone was dead at the finish, so that tells me the race was really hard.
The only thing I can see working is Rodriguez sending Moreno and another teammate up the road and doing a short attack to catch up with them. But no way Garmin (which is strong enough to control the race) or Liquigas will let that happen.
Dutchsmurf said:But no way Garmin (which is strong enough to control the race) or Liquigas will let that happen.
