thehog
BANNED
frenchfry said:I would have thought being a smooth liar would be a prerequisite for working for Lance.
Lim as a liar -FAIL
Get him on the stand! Quick!
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
frenchfry said:I would have thought being a smooth liar would be a prerequisite for working for Lance.
Lim as a liar -FAIL
Publicus said:You are welcome. Glad you confirmed your pre-conceived notion.
Cerberus said:That's a good point, no risk of suspension, not nearly as dependant on the sport of cycling for his income, probably nothing that counts as criminal involvement in the doping. We've been focusing on the riders, but the bus driver really has the least to lose by coming clean.
To win the game you have to capture the King, BPC.Ginkgo said:yes i got an idea from reading the thread. upon asking some questions and receiving answers, and upon more inspection of the forum, the evidence backs up my original suspicion.
this is about getting armstrong first and foremost. not anti doping.
From Dan Coyles book, Lance Armsrtongs War."The king! Where is the king?"
Dr. Michele Ferrari, Armstrong's 50-year-old trainer, stood on the cobbled street with his long arms outstretched in the golden Spanish sunlight. He was dark-haired and darty eyed. He wore a shiny robins-egg-blue sweatsuit, a red nylon backpack, and a broad, teasing smile.
"The king, he is late," Ferrari announced in the manner of the town crier, gesturing theatrically toward the tall wooden doors. "But that is why he is the king, no? A king should not have to hurry."
Ginkgo said:yes i got an idea from reading the thread. upon asking some questions and receiving answers, and upon more inspection of the forum, the evidence backs up my original suspicion.
this is about getting armstrong first and foremost. not anti doping.
Smelly Leaves said:this is about getting armstrong first and foremost. not anti doping.
Moose McKnuckles said:Another pathetic incarnation of the cycling world's biggest tosser.
Susan Westemeyer said:You can read about it in Landis' mail which was made public on Thursday, here: http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=7473
I believe in the 2004 section.
Susan
Dr. Maserati said:It is 10 minutes to the hour here - how long before he gets a new IP address?
BroDeal said:He does not have a new IP address. He was lying about that. When they have been banning him, they have simply been banning his account. They have done a few IP bans, but he has been using proxies to get around those bans.
theswordsman said:Or the motorcycle delivery guy who brought the blood when it was needed.
ExRower said:Vaughters needs to speak up if he truly is against doping. Simply not denying is not enough. If he is sincere in his efforts for a cleaner future in cycling, then he needs to bring light to the past so that it will not be repeated again.
ExRower said:Vaughters needs to speak up if he truly is against doping. Simply not denying is not enough. If he is sincere in his efforts for a cleaner future in cycling, then he needs to bring light to the past so that it will not be repeated again.
stephens said:I find it strange that so many of you seem to think that if one has "principles," he should automatically want to play the role of snitch. Can't one want to have a clean sport, not want to participate in doping himself, and still just want to mind his own business and leave the enforcement of the rules up to the authorities? It sucks that you guys are going to just decide that anyone that doesn't cooperate must be trying to hide their own doping.
stephens said:We're not talking about new riders. We were talking about guys from the past who just might prefer to get on with their lives. Besides, for 90% of pro cyclists, it's not about winning. They're just workers.
Cerberus said:Which changes exactly nothing. A clean worker, still gets paid less because others dope because it makes him a comparatively weaker worker. No normal clean rider is going to be ok with doping.
ExRower said:you do the crime , you must do the time. Just because the crime was 10 years ago, doesn't give them a get out of jail pass.
Alpe d'Huez said:Correct.
His personal info says his name is Bobby Crehan and he is from Ireland. However, his IP address says he is in Secaucus, New Jersey.
Huh, who would have thought Secaucus would be such a tourism hot spot for Irish vacationers?
Alpe d'Huez said:Correct.
His personal info says his name is Bobby Crehan and he is from Ireland. However, his IP address says he is in Secaucus, New Jersey.
stephens said:I find it strange that so many of you seem to think that if one has "principles," he should automatically want to play the role of snitch. Can't one want to have a clean sport, not want to participate in doping himself, and still just want to mind his own business and leave the enforcement of the rules up to the authorities? It sucks that you guys are going to just decide that anyone that doesn't cooperate must be trying to hide their own doping.