Nice interview, if rather fluffy. The part about Vingegaard and the monuments was interesting . Interviewer keeps asking about TdF 2024.
View: https://youtu.be/wV2wvz850-M?feature=shared
Quite delusional that you are on your assessments. A rider breaking a wrist now is an excuse and not an objective fact that hindered his preparation. Having multiple objectives besides the Tour and being sucessful in them is an excuse to performing not so well at the Tour. Sean Kelly was already pointing at this lack of base form before Pogi's demise "I'm dead, I'm gone".He's learning probably with remco in giving good excuses. That's the part i like less in some important cycling riders (it's not just pogacar or remco), the excuses they always find when they lose some race.
Yes! I would steer him away from Flanders this year as he would have to maintain a very high level for three months including the Giro. Perhaps a little time off. He can take up Flanders and P-R after a few years, assuming he’s satisfied with his TdF career at that pointPogi should do some Classics (Strade, MSR, RVV, LBL) AND the Giro 2024 and then come into the Tour with an already dominant season under his belt. He can still be good in July off of the Giro, which he can win without being in top form.
Sean kelly is the same guy that yesterday talked the "bullsh**" of too much vertical meters in today's Tour de france era, that can lead to "clinical issues", maybe you are inspired by the bullsh** he says.Quite delusional that you are on your assessments. A rider breaking a wrist now is an excuse and not an objective fact that hindered his preparation. Having multiple objectives besides the Tour and being sucessful in them is an excuse to performing not so well at the Tour. Sean Kelly was already pointing at this lack of base form before Pogi's demise "I'm dead, I'm gone".
Maybe you can grow up and attempt building an argument around the insight voiced by Sean Kelly that proved to be pretty accurante...instead of making an ad hominem about him.Sean kelly is the same guy that yesterday talked the "bullsh**" of too much vertical meters in today's Tour de france era, that can lead to "clinical issues", maybe you are inspired by the bullsh** he says.
Pogacar's coach and pogacar's general manager already said that pogacar doing the classics is not a problem for is shape at the tour, it's the opposite. So, i think they know better about that issue, than you.
Another point, pogacar already said this week that he could never beat Vingegaard on that TT at the Tour de france, so now he is contradicting himself.
Pogacar did the best numbers of his life except for the La loze stage, pogacar's coach already said he was in great shape in the first 2 weeks, so there's no indications that he wasn't at his best in the Tour, except for La loze stage, but he could never win the Tour on that stage, after what happened in the TT.
The best riders like to protect themselves when they lose, and they always speak about some "excuses" to justify they're defeats. It's not just pogacar.
The guy that is constantly banned in this forum(but you improved in the last weeks), saying to other users to "grown up", you are the joke of this forum 😂Maybe you can grow up and attempt building an argument around the insight voiced by Sean Kelly that proved to be pretty accurante...instead of making an ad hominem about him.
Pogi never focused solely on the Tour like Vingo. And there's a reason why Vingo does it. So this is all about Pogi's personality and the way he loves to race and face new challenges.
Now you keep writing on the same lame "excuses" point as a general way of riders coping with failrues. But there's a difference in providing a reason for failures and providing a reason for failures being labeled an excuse a priori.
Sure, just don't get too nervous or too personal, it takes away your good judgement and you begin to sound like a lunatic.The guy that is constantly banned in this forum(but you improved in the last weeks), saying to other users to "grown up", you are the joke of this forum 😂
San millan and gianneti know better about pogacar than Sean kelly certainly.
Sean Kelly is famous for being a fantastic bike racer.Sean kelly is the same guy that yesterday talked the "bullsh**" of too much vertical meters in today's Tour de france era, that can lead to "clinical issues", maybe you are inspired by the bullsh** he says.
Pogacar's coach and pogacar's general manager already said that pogacar doing the classics is not a problem for is shape at the tour, it's the opposite. So, i think they know better about that issue, than you.
Another point, pogacar already said this week that he could never beat Vingegaard on that TT at the Tour de france, so now he is contradicting himself.
Pogacar did the best numbers of his life except for the La loze stage, pogacar's coach already said he was in great shape in the first 2 weeks, so there's no indications that he wasn't at his best in the Tour, except for La loze stage, but he could never win the Tour on that stage, after what happened in the TT.
The best riders like to protect themselves when they lose, and they always speak about some "excuses" to justify they're defeats. It's not just pogacar.
Just like your aviSean Kelly is famous for being a fantastic bike racer.
Pogacar's general manager is famous for clinical issues...
Maybe, but he also lost to Vingegaard in 2021.I tend to think what caused him grief last year was his LBL crash, wrist injury and interrupted TdF preparation - not racing the spring classics.
The LBL crash meant he lost condition and recovery which cost him big time on stage 17.
In Ayusos case it is probably a bit of American knuckleheadness as well.Pogacar is a gentleman and has no time to deal with this typical Spanish bravado.