Fans loved him. Some riders really hated him.Are we talking amongst the riders or the fans?
Never heard a rider from another squad talk nicely about Lance and have definitely heard guys on his own team (Frankie, Tyler) not say such nice things.
I also wouldn't call it a "myth" in any way. He came off as an arrogant liar, then he told his story and admitted he was an arrogant liar, then he hosted a podcast and he comes off as an arrogant jerk.
He's made his own myth, in my mind.
Except for the fans that hated him!Fans loved him. Some riders really hated him.
Absolutely doping isn't equal. Armstrong proved that. Its also why a doping free-for-all would never be a level playing field - doping costs $$$. What we are seeing is combination of doping and talent/training/marginal gains etc.Thank you! You just summed up the entire PED issue in a few sentences. It's never the same, it's never equal.
Obviously something unequal is going on when Pogacar, van der Poel, Wout, and Vingegaard win every single race. It's bad for the sport and clearly signals something is going on.
Speculating here, but it might not be practical for everyone to be on it. He rides for the UAE. Look what they did to Manchester City. They have put a seemingly endless amount of money into that club, in order to make it the best in the world, while not giving a *** about financial fair play.If there really is something new and game changing going on, how long until everyone is on it? The traditional methods trickled down to the rest of the peloton eventually, but it seems 2 or 3 riders are on something completely separate right now.
I'm not sure what that has to do with the 'clinic'. They spend all this money on buying players. And because they have no fans for that team, they have little revenue. That is why they have a problem with FFP.Speculating here, but it might not be practical for everyone to be on it. He rides for the UAE. Look what they did to Manchester City. They have put a seemingly endless amount of money into that club, in order to make it the best in the world, while not giving a *** about financial fair play.
If there's a similar endless money stream into the cycling team, he could be on the most comprehensive and expensive program in the history of the sport. It certainly looks that way when he rides.
I was just making the point that probably not everyone can afford to get on what Pog is on.I'm not sure what that has to do with the 'clinic'. They spend all this money on buying players. And because they have no fans for that team, they have little revenue. That is why they have a problem with FFP.
Other football teams also spend huge amounts on players, not just Man City (since 2008)
![]()
The cycling team is completely different, as Pogacar is probably the most popular rider at the moment. As a result, the cycling team is a good investment for UAE. Colnago's revenues are growing - https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/th...et-trend-and-triples-turnover-in-three-years/
No question that Man City is a huge money sinking business, like most football teams. But for a rich country like UAE, these losses are only pennies. There are much worse run teams, such as Barcelona, which is completely fan-owned with a large fan base, yet they are still constantly in huge debt. Or the post-Roman Chelsea which is owned by a equity firm/oligarchs. So in football it doesn't really matter whether a team is owned by a country like ManCity or PSG, or by oligarchs or fans they are always likely to be unprofitable money-suckers.I was just making the point that probably not everyone can afford to get on what Pog is on.
As I understand it (and I might well be wrong), City have the biggest deficit of any club in the world, yet UAE keep putting money into it, so they must feel the publicity itself is a worthwhile investment as long as they have the (or one of the) best team(s) in the world.
Pog is the most popular rider in part because he's a fun character, but mostly because he's the best there is. They might have a budget to keep him the best, that no one, or very few, can match.
I'm not talking about his salary but about doping. Like you say it's pennies to them, so if they could spend 5 million euros per year on a program that created the greatest cyclist ever, it doesn't seem unreasonable that they would do it, and that might be why he's such an outlier, because no one can really come close to matching that.No question that Man City is a huge money sinking business, like most football teams. But for a rich country like UAE, these losses are only pennies. There are much worse run teams, such as Barcelona, which is completely fan-owned with a large fan base, yet they are still constantly in huge debt. Or the post-Roman Chelsea which is owned by a equity firm/oligarchs. So in football it doesn't really matter whether a team is owned by a country like ManCity or PSG, or by oligarchs or fans they are always likely to be unprofitable money-suckers.
Pogacar's salary, 6 million euros a year, which I think at least 15 teams would be happy to pay if he was available. Not so long ago ProTeams like Total paid this much to Sagan or Israel to Froome.
If €5 million randomly made someone the world's greatest cyclist, there would be thousands of people vying for the title.I'm not talking about his salary but about doping. Like you say it's pennies to them, so if they could spend 5 million euros per year on a program that created the greatest cyclist ever, it doesn't seem unreasonable that they would do it, and that might be why he's such an outlier, because no one can really come close to matching that.
Now like I said, it's pure speculation and I have no idea weather something like that is even possible.
I do seem to remember reading, a long time ago, that Jan Ullrich was spending 100.000 euros a year on doping back in the day, and so at least back then, and most likely still, budget plays a big part in why everybody can't just do the same thing.
Not a random person. Obviously you start with a spectacularly talented cyclist. But if you have a group of similarly talented riders and one of them has a much bigger budget, that might make the difference.If €5 million randomly made someone the world's greatest cyclist, there would be thousands of people vying for the title.
UAE budget is big, but that's because they pay a lot to the riders. As they have many quality riders. I don't doubt that 'clinic' stuff doesn't happen at the team, of course it does, just like all the WT teams. But I doubt that the Sheikh as one of the richest men in the world is involved in any 'clinic' stuff or has any day to day insight into the cycling team or the sport in general.Not a random person. Obviously you start with a spectacularly talented cyclist. But if you have a group of similarly talented riders and one of them has a much bigger budget, that might make the difference.
Pogacar’s winning record stretches way back before he joined UAE. eg 2018 Tour de l‘Avenir.Speculating here, but it might not be practical for everyone to be on it. He rides for the UAE. Look what they did to Manchester City. They have put a seemingly endless amount of money into that club, in order to make it the best in the world, while not giving a *** about financial fair play.
If there's a similar endless money stream into the cycling team, he could be on the most comprehensive and expensive program in the history of the sport. It certainly looks that way when he rides.
I don’t remember if it was this poster or another but they were arguing that was after UAE scouted him so he was in development/system for UAE for 2018.Pogacar’s winning record stretches way back before he joined UAE. eg 2018 Tour de l‘Avenir.
UAE already had Pogacar on their books when he won the 2018 Tour de l’Avenir.I don’t remember if it was this poster or another but they were arguing that was after UAE scouted him so he was in development/system for UAE for 2018.
Also UAE for the riders they have are not putting in too many great performances on a broad level at times. Last years Tour was the first with something like a consistently strong climbing support for Pogacar. Visma or formely Ineos/Sky seem way more streamlined and dominant in what they focus on. Or put differently - if Pogacar was only a result of an expensive doping program that only UAE can afford, they would certainly want a Pogacar #2 and a Pogacar #3, and better support for their Pogacars and so on, no? MSR for example was a huge fail on teamlevel again.Pogacar’s winning record stretches way back before he joined UAE. eg 2018 Tour de l‘Avenir.
If they have their own Ferrari guy, they might say they need 'X amount' transferred to him, which can't be on their booksUAE budget is big, but that's because they pay a lot to the riders. As they have many quality riders. I don't doubt that 'clinic' stuff doesn't happen at the team, of course it does, just like all the WT teams. But I doubt that the Sheikh as one of the richest men in the world is involved in any 'clinic' stuff or has any day to day insight into the cycling team or the sport in general.
My feeling is that at the end of the year Gianetti always prints out the UCI ranking and shows it to the big boss saying 'hey folks, we have the best team, if you keep transferring money the UAE name will stay at the top of the list' or something silly like that.
I'm not sure what your point is. That doesn't contradict anything I've saidPogacar’s winning record stretches way back before he joined UAE. eg 2018 Tour de l‘Avenir.
I'm sure Pog wants to be the undisputed leader. Having two other riders on his level would be terrible for team dynamics. You could have a Jumbo Vuelta-situation in every race, and soon the other two (or Pog himself) would want to leave the team, and the knowledge of what they're doing would spread to the rest of the peloton.Also UAE for the riders they have are not putting in too many great performances on a broad level at times. Last years Tour was the first with something like a consistently strong climbing support for Pogacar. Visma or formely Ineos/Sky seem way more streamlined and dominant in what they focus on. Or put differently - if Pogacar was only a result of an expensive doping program that only UAE can afford, they would certainly want a Pogacar #2 and a Pogacar #3, and better support for their Pogacars and so on, no? MSR for example was a huge fail on teamlevel again.
That said, since I am convinced doping is still a big part, and there is not only a difference in access but also response - it will never be a level-playing field.
On the other hand, one can also ask, to make it more philosophical, if winning the genetical lottery in terms of physical capacity is any more or any less pure luck than being a good responder to certain substances. Both cases are exogenous factors beyond the influence of oneself.
The most unfair thing is obviously the Armstrong type of case. Where one rider is protected by authorities and others are even specifically targeted if they come close to said rider. But I hope thats not the case this time.
I wasn't referring to your comments. I was referring to the OPs reasoning when this thread started. I also think you are misconstruing ppanther92's point about Pog not having strong supporting teammates for the mountains but he/she can correct you.I'm not sure what your point is. That doesn't contradict anything I've said
to make it more philosophical, if winning the genetical lottery in terms of physical capacity is any more or any less pure luck than being a good responder to certain substances.
It certainly is strange that we call innate aerobic capacity "talent" whereas we'd never say someone who's 6'10" was born with a "talent" for being tall.Just wanted to mention that I strongly disagree with this view. Winning the genetic lottery in terms of physical capacity is clearly talent. To suggest being a super responder to doping is "talent" is just wrong.
You don't become taller by using your tallness.It certainly is strange that we call innate aerobic capacity "talent" whereas we'd never say someone who's 6'10" was born with a "talent" for being tall.
and you don't increase your genetically determined vo2 max ceiling by exercising like Greg LemondYou don't become taller by using your tallness.
“That's ***, and not nice. It is not respectful to the other riders. It's not all just about me and UAE Emirates," ...."In the media, as is often the case, it is ***."