[[deleted material]] you pout that you turn of your tv cause he win when the rider you cheer for(allegedly doped too from you but that would be okei for you says it all doesnt it?-- if you was even able to admit why and you dont want him to win or your tired of he wins it all okei its logical would at least be a reason to this now its just comical and laughable - but whatever makes you cope with your feelings I guess..
And boy wonder is raising cycling to new levels wether or not you like that its irrelevant isnt it? He is the best cyclist weve seen what you do with that I hardly doubt anyone cares, the public and rating havent been higher and its mostly to do with the boy wonder. Again just facts dont blame the messenger.
[[deleted material]]
Pogacar fan here:
I'd like to be oblivious to it, but some things are just to hard to ignore. Injury here, injury there, of course it had an impact on him last year, but the jump in performance, really not just by him at all, is quite startling. And it's not that this is a clinic theory, it's an acknowledged fact, established by the riders themselves who are through the bank talking of doing their best ever numbers. And forget about the 90ies and the comaprisons with them, that we are comparing it to the 90ies is in itself a red flag, but Pogacar is pushing like almost 1w/kg more on long climbs than what used to be competitive just some years ago. All of this can easily be looked up and the watts calculations that are out there are accurate enough for Vingegaard to call some of them "very accurate" in the context of having pushed his best ever numbers.
So I wonder: what do you make of this? Minutes faster than the records from the 90ies, minutes not seconds. An improvement of gigantic magnitude by not just Pogacar. Performance differences within the race itself that don't make any sense (not a clinic perspective, watched LR recently and they didn't say anything about doping but basically also said they have no idea what's going on, it's all over the place and doesn't make sense given what used to be true).
There's got to be an explanation to it and it logically can't be new science and training methods, because that doesn't explain why the performance plateau of lager parts of the Peloton has made an already insane jump last year, and an otherworldly one on top of that this year.
This can all be easily read out of readily available data published by news sources, not a single clinic theorist is needed for that.
Like Derek Gee is outperforming peak Froome, and to say Pogacar and Vingegaard "outperform" Froome (who is the more relevant comparison than Armstrong/Pantani/Ullrich/Indurain, because there is a greater equivalence in methods and material) doesn't do them justice. They've transcended peak Froomes abilities to an extent that they seem to exist on a different plane of cycling existence altogether.
Natura non facit saltus! Nature does not make jumps! is a guiding principle that seems to get violated here. The principle has stood the time from Aristotle to Darwin, more than 2000 years. So does nature jump all of a sudden?
Edit: a ban, just when I was asking a question! Sad!