• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 243 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
well if Lemond 30 years ago couldnt do it than everybody else is doping right;
Yes, that is the general idea; it's not proof or an accusation, but it's a point worth considering.

It must be noted that in the article, it states that Lemond began using a power meter in 1992, when he may have been in decline and possibly not producing quite as much power as he once did.
 
the tyres are the biggest gain, nobody talked about rolling resistance even 10 years ago
Thanks for the info. But I recall very clearly that people were talking about rolling resistance in the early 1990s - even earlier when clinchers started eating into a market dominated by tubulars. But it does stand out in that table that ever wider isn’t necessarily faster. The 2nd ranked tyre by rolling resistance is 25mm.

Good 25mm tyres can still be fast. And why isn't aero drag in that table? Aero drag is CdA. Frontal area is half the drag. I use 25mm and the data you shared confirms I’ve made a good choice and don’t need to rush out to buy anything wider. Not interested in comfort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: veganrob
Thanks for the info. But I recall very clearly that people were talking about rolling resistance in the early 1990s - even earlier when clinchers started eating into a market dominated by tubulars. But it does stand out in that table that ever wider isn’t necessarily faster. The 2nd ranked tyre by rolling resistance is 25mm.

Good 25mm tyres can still be fast. And why isn't aero drag in that table? Aero drag is CdA. Frontal area is half the drag. I use 25mm and the data you shared confirms I’ve made a good choice and don’t need to rush out to buy anything wider. Not interested in comfort.
really ? do you have any links about cycling rolling resistance in the 1990, i have been in the industry since about 2000 and have never heard about that in that time. I am not even talking about wider is faster I am talking about manufacturers starting to really work on reducing RR; I am quite convinced difference betwen Pantani tyres and conti GP 5000 is at least 10 watts per tyre ( I believe its much more, they had regular butyl tubes back than in tubular). The fastest tubular with latex inner tube right now (after 30 years) is about 5 watts slower than conti GP 5000.
BTW I agree with you in second paragraph; wider is only faster if you pump it to the same PSI; i ride 23 front that measures 25mm on rim.
 
Last edited:
really ? do you have any links about cycling rolling resistance in the 1990, i have been in the industry since about 2000 and have never heard about that in that time. I am not even talking about wider is faster I am talking about manufacturers starting to really work on reducing RR; I am quite convinced difference betwen Pantani tyres and conti GP 5000 is at least 10 watts per tyre ( I believe its much more, they had regular butyl tubes back than in tubular). The fastest tubular with latex inner tube right now (after 30 years) is about 5 watts slower than conti GP 5000.
BTW I agree with you in second paragraph; wider is only faster if you pump it to the same PSI; i ride 23 front that measures 25mm on rim.
Yes there were articles, including in magazines of that time (I started in the sport about 1986). I am sure if you search you will find stuff to support what I claimed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: memyselfandI
The only reason Vingegaard didn't go on to win the Vuelta too, was to not make it so obvious as to have repercussions. They knew they were walking a fine line.
Redacted. This is more your doper is worse than my doper stuff. Can we remind you that Vingegaard was glowing in the dark at Combloux. In June 2021 nobody knew who he was.
 
Last edited:
Resurrecting a guy who spent weeks in hospital to be at his best level ever a couple of months later is way more appalling. Talk about crazy stuff! Dont even want to know what they gave him and that is after the most doped performance ever at Combloux a year earlier.
I'd say what Gianetti-Matxin engineered with Tadej throughout the course of this entire season is by far the most appalling and repugnant thing we've seen to date. 33% improvement in the mountains, almost 14 minutes better against Jonas, who, despite his terrible incident, still put up his best numbers and yet lost by 6'17". Who knows what Teddy's been given, but with who's behind it (and the journos are strangely silent on emphasizing this point) they are ruining the sport.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stablo and E_F_
I'd say what Gianetti-Matxin engineered with Tadej throughout the course of this entire season is by far the most appalling and repugnant thing we've seen to date. 33% improvement in the mountains, almost 14 minutes better against Jonas, who, despite his terrible incident, still put up his best numbers and yet lost by 6'17". Who knows what Teddy's been given, but with who's behind it (and the journos are strangely silent on emphasizing this point) they are ruining the sport.
Still not more insane than what Visma must have given Vinge to go from hospital to best level in Tour! Talk about ruining the sport.
 
Still not more insane than what Visma must have given Vinge to go from hospital to best level in Tour! Talk about ruining the sport.
It's obviously ridiculous what Visma does with vingeggard, but if you're a Pogacar fan who want Pogacar to seem clean, the little competition that Jonas offered in the first half of the tour helped your case.

If Visma didn't get Vingegard rocket fueled for the race, more people would be complaining about Pogacar ridiculous dominance and his obvious doping
 
  • Like
Reactions: noob
This SGF 1000 story is crazy (but then again some of those EPO stories were wild stuff).
The court case against Jorge Navarro, Nicholas Surick and Jason Servis and some 30 others (!) which brought to light SGF 1000 in the horse racing world has produced also some other interesting things -
"regular" clenbuterol and "other" clenbuterol - https://paulickreport.com/news/the-...new-wiretap-evidence-in-the-federal-drug-case
It's never specified what the difference is between the two, but regulators have reported finding compounded clenbuterol in the course of investigations which is designed to be significantly more potent (ten times more potent, in some cases) than the commercially-available, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved version.
The investigation "bled over" -
When drug adulteration and misbranding charges were first announced against 27 defendants in March 2020, prosecutors said (rather cryptically) that those March arrests were the fruit of a different investigation that had bled over into horse racing.
"real EPO" and "generic EPO" -
Navarro assured Surick that the "real EPO" (as opposed to "generic EPO" also referenced by the two men) would be testable for three days. At four days, regulators would "see a cloud but they don't know what the *** it is ... Now five days, you are good. Now with the one here, they can't find anything." Fishman also boasted that one of his products, a blood builder, had been given to a horse in New Jersey who was out-of-competition tested 12 hours later. The test sample was sent to a laboratory in Hong Kong, and the test came back negative.

"mind-blowing declaration" -
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/oth...erapy-here-s-why-that-s-a-problem/ar-AA1ql6b6
The optics of someone responsible for managing doping control tests declaring an unregulated, compounded subject benign – despite having limited assurance of what’s really in it – while knowing it’s one of the most hot-button substances at the center of a then-active federal criminal investigation into doping of horses is mind-blowing.
So what's actually in SGF 1000?
Court files have never revealed any documents authored by its maker, Medivet, about what actually was in it, if not the previously-touted growth factors.
Some reports from labs gave, “ovine transforming growth factor-beta”, “hepatocyte growth factor,” “fibroblast growth factor” and evidence of , "acepromazine, levamisole, detomidine, pyrilamine, lidocaine, MEGX, xylazine, and caffeine."