Re: Sky
pastronef said:
there's always the option of not cliking on cyclingnews.com's links to Sky related articles
I don't often click on those articles. But that's not the point.
The point is that you don't even have to click on the link. The title tells you all you need to know.
Team Sky to use Ford team vehicles in 2016
That's really the whole story there. I don't see any purpose in following the link. The whole world knows that Sky has been using Jaguar. I didn't have to follow any links to have that fact hammered into my head. Now they're going to use Ford. Wow. Fascinating.
Do you know what kind of cars any other teams uses? I don't, and I couldn't care less. It has nothing to do with anything.
wrinklyvet said:
You have the optional luxury of ignoring it all.
If only. I can ignore the articles, but not the links, the banner pics, and the visual pollution.
The point being made, is that CN's homepage, and god-knows plenty of Anglo cycling press outlets, are littered with such shallow Sky trivia on a daily basis, making avoiding it somewhat difficult if you go to these sites for any
other cycling news.
It's quite simple, really. There's a bias. And it's obvious.
And it's boring.