Teams & Riders The "MVP" Mathieu Van der Poel Road Discussion Thread

Page 330 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mathieu:

Just before the second pass on the Oude Kwaremont, I was hit by a car, which meant I had to come from far away.

That explains it. I thought it strange he was so far back when I 15s before, in another screenshot, saw him just beside Pog.
Unclear when, but I don't think it was immediately before the climb. He starts Kwaremont in front of Pogi and can be seen for a while before that.
 
Dude, save some of that positivity for Rogla in July.
I have done it before, I shall do it again

85C7lUl.png
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rackham
There is nothing in there about a car, as far as I can see.
??
Quote is right in the beginning. Sure, I used google translation to english, but I doubt it gets the qoute completely wrong.

Something must have happened (and for god sake I don't use it as an excuse why mvdp lost), go back an watch the replay. MvdP is right beside Pog, 15s later he is way back. I was puzzled during the broadcast what the hell happened.
 
??
Quote is right in the beginning. Sure, I used google translation to english, but I doubt it gets the qoute completely wrong.

Something must have happened (and for gods sake I don't use it as an excuse why mvdp lost), go back an watch the replay. MvdP is right beside Pog, 15s later he is way back. I was puzzled during the broadcast what the hell happened.
I was puzzled as well as he had somehow lost about 30 positions in 10 seconds off camera.

The text that auto-translates as "hit by a car" actually reads something along the lines of "I was ridden into the side". Not sure what that means exactly, but there would be no reason for there to be a car anywhere near Mathieu at that point in the race.
 
??
Quote is right in the beginning. Sure, I used google translation to english, but I doubt it gets the qoute completely wrong.

Something must have happened (and for god sake I don't use it as an excuse why mvdp lost), go back an watch the replay. MvdP is right beside Pog, 15s later he is way back. I was puzzled during the broadcast what the hell happened.
Al vroeg in de wedstrijd geraakte Mathieu van der Poel betrokken bij een stevige valpartij. “Die crash was natuurlijk niet ideaal, maar al bij al kwamen we nog goed weg. Jammer, maar het had erger kunnen zijn. Net voor de tweede passage op de Oude Kwaremont werd ik in de kant gereden, waardoor ik van ver moest komen. Daarna zat ik waar ik moest zitten”, geeft Van der Poel aan.

Van der Poel was involved in a serious crash early in the race. “That crash wasn’t ideal, of course, but all things considered, we got off relatively lightly. It was unfortunate, but it could have been worse. Just before the second ascent of the Oude Kwaremont, I was forced off to the side, which meant I had to come from quite far back. After that, I was in the right position,” Van der Poel said.

...

What point do you refer to? At the start of Kwaremont, MvdP is in front of Pogi. Then we see the break, and as they cut back we can see that Pogi used the grass to move around the bunch and get to the front.
 
??
Quote is right in the beginning. Sure, I used google translation to english, but I doubt it gets the qoute completely wrong.

Something must have happened (and for gods sake I don't use it as an excuse why mvdp lost), go back an watch the replay. MvdP is right beside Pog, 15s later he is way back. I was puzzled during the broadcast what the hell happened.
It did, though. He only said he was pushed off the road (by another rider is the implication, as sometimes happens on these narrow paths).
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmRacer
MVP always had moments in previous RVV where he is not well positioned. He likes to race from behind to hide his level and preserve energy.
But he was right beside Pog and then all of the sudden way back. Can't be intentional at such as crucial moment. He had to push quite hard to get up to Pog's group. You said it yourself: MvdP is a mad man. :)
 
It's quite strange, actually. These auto-translations are usually quite good. I suspect as AI becomes more involved they will start to get worse.
LLMs are better at translation about 90% of the time, though they'll also make mistakes that Google Translate and DeepL used not to make. This seems the type of error resulting from a shoddy combination of the two.
 
LLMs are better at translation about 90% of the time, though they'll also make mistakes that Google Translate and DeepL used not to make. This seems the type of error resulting from a shoddy combination of the two.
Google Translate does the sentence correctly if that's all you include, but if you include the whole paragraph which has earlier text about a crash it invents the bit about a car.
 

TRENDING THREADS