- Jan 8, 2020
- 5,362
- 6,127
- 18,180
Fair enough, but can you explain why?It would be stupid to change the plan even if Remco wins both mountain stages in Swiss.
Fair enough, but can you explain why?It would be stupid to change the plan even if Remco wins both mountain stages in Swiss.
All perfectly valid points.I don't think last minute change of plans makes sense. He may be in great form now but can he maintain it? Has he prepared himself enough for a 3-week race?
With peak Tadej and Primoz around and possible shortcomings in GT preparations the Tour could turn into another unpleasant GT experience.
It's better to prepare optimally for the planned race (Vuelta) and have a good chance to do the real damage there.
I know, but how can he say that before having raced it? I suppose time will tell, but there are few tt kms and will the explosive type of climbs best suit his qualities?There's no way he is riding the Tour this year. Not everyone is obsessing over the Tour and Remco said himself that the Vuelta is his favorite race. Also, the Tour is a hectic race and it's not sure Remco is ready yet. Although for someone with reputedly low bike handling skills he's doing pretty good this season.
Maybe he's watched it on the telly?I know, but how can he say that before having raced it?
Well, so have I, but that doesn't tell me much about what it's actually like to race it.Maybe he's watched it on the telly?
I remember he's stated just liking to ride in Spain. He's won San Sebastian, he's won Burgos, he had a good result in Itzulia and finished ahead of Vingegaard and Roglic there. He had also claimed Liège was his favorite monument as a junior, before having raced it.I know, but how can he say that before having raced it? I suppose time will tell, but there are few tt kms and will the explosive type of climbs best suit his qualities?
Thanks, perfect explanation.I remember he's stated just liking to ride in Spain. He's won San Sebastian, he's won Burgos, he had a good result in Itzulia and finished ahead of Vingegaard and Roglic there. He had also claimed Liège was his favorite monument as a junior, before having raced it.
I remember he's stated just liking to ride in Spain. He's won San Sebastian, he's won Burgos, he had a good result in Itzulia and finished ahead of Vingegaard and Roglic there. He had also claimed Liège was his favorite monument as a junior, before having raced it.
He still lives with his parents as far as i know, in Schepdaal (training in BP/RVV territory). But he has trained a lot in the Ardennes in the past but now he often goes to Calpe. If you check his Strava, you can see where he trains.Cheers.
Where does he live or train?
I seem to remember a story about him thinking of living in Monaco but then decided against it.
As logic said you can follow his strava and see where he trains. He lives in Belgium. Often does big training blocks in the Calpe area of Spain where many pros train in the winter. He did 1 altitude camp in Tenerife between Tirreno and Basque Country.Cheers.
Where does he live or train?
I seem to remember a story about him thinking of living in Monaco but then decided against it.
Disagree. Many riders do TdS/Dauphine build-up to TdF. If he wins tdS then he is on track to TdF just as much as (if not more than) anyone else.It would be stupid to change the plan even if Remco wins both mountain stages in Swiss.
This is why I say go in for a baptism of fire IF, which remains to be scene, his form is really high. I mean he will have to face the Tour and Tadej eventually, the longer he is kept away, the more brutal it will be the first time. I'm thinking of Hinault, of Fignon, of Lemond. He should ride the Tour as his (almost) first Grand Tour experience. It will serve him better than the Vuelta!To be fair with the wide open roads and less street furniture the majority of the time and also the heat meaning the peloton take more semi rest days allowing breaks to go for 10 minutes the Vuelta is arguably the least stressful GT in terms of positioning and crashes. With his still relative inexperience within the bunch I can se why all that appeals.
...the longer he is kept away, the more brutal it will be the first time.
I'm thinking of Hinault, of Fignon, of Lemond. He should ride the Tour as his (almost) first Grand Tour experience. It will serve him better than the Vuelta!
Thats not how periodization works.Disagree. Many riders do TdS/Dauphine build-up to TdF. If he wins tdS then he is on track to TdF just as much as (if not more than) anyone else.
He has been training, losing weight and racing the whole season. If he isn't ready for a GT now, then he will never be.
If there exists a better plan, then it would be stupid not to change the plan.
I agree with most of your assessment, but sometimes fortune favors the bold! I'm aware Fignon was put in an exceptional position at 22, because of Hinault's knee injury, but then he won the 83 Tour! And then in 84 he was arguably the most dominant Tour winner in modern cycling history. Mind you, I'm not saying Remco should equal Fignon (that's already been done by Pogacar), but only that his team need not overly worry about sending him to the Tour if his form is good enough. As Pogacar and even Bernal have done.disagree with this completely. giro was too brutal specifically because it was stupid to enter that without the proper prep. y would u want to simply replicate that experience again, further damaging his confidence. also, he is still learning to pace himself on climbs, etc. and his bike handling and descending appear to be improving.
not sure what is meant here. both hinault and fignon's first GT was not the TDF. and both lemond and hinault specifically waited until they were at least 23+ to compete in their first TDF. Fignon only did so a bit earlier because he was slated to support hinault who was then out due to his knee injury.
no. stay the course. give remco a full season of building. right now it has already turned into a successful season. it has the potential to continue to develop into an extraordinary season (particularly for a 22 year old) if he does well here, in spain and then in the one-day races at the end of the year. he would then target his first TDF, with all the proper prep next year.
i get the sense that the "need" for him to compete this year is perhaps a fan's impatience (which I share), while not being good for Remco's development (basically the mistake that was made last year).
So true, and I would think more folks here would understand that.Thats not how periodization works.
We do, but just don't know what was calculated in his specific case. Only he and his trainers do.So true, and I would think more folks here would understand that.
That’s true as well, but I think we (I) extrapolate from a rider’s larger season goals (one rider with Le Tour as primary objective, another with Vuelta/Worlds as primary objective) and understand where they are likely to be in their training buildup. But yeah, we can’t know for sure unless we see their training logs or talk to their DS.We do, but just don't know what was calculated in his specific case. Only he and his trainers do.
True but that’s also like saying it’s a no-no for Roglic and Vingegaard to win the Dauphine. Periodization is indeed important but if someone is dominating 3 weeks out from the Tour that’s not some sort of kiss of death.So true, and I would think more folks here would understand that.
Hmmn, maybe we’re on different trains of thought here. The issue isn’t the winning or not. The issue is a rider being at their absolute best in the Dauphine or Suisse but not being able to hold that form until the 3rd week of the Tour, when race is often decided. I assume Roglic, for instance, was able to win the Dauphine without being at 100%.Tr
True but that’s also like saying it’s a no-no for Roglic and Vingegaard to win the Dauphine. Periodization is indeed important but if someone is dominating 3 weeks out from the Tour that’s not some sort of kiss of death.
