Todays idiot masters fattie doper

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 16, 2009
3,035
0
0
Race Radio said:
Yup, All 45 year old's have legs like that

I've known a 25yr old that was definitely clean that had legs like that but if this guy wasn't at least that big at 30 there is NO way that he got like that without chemical asasistance
 
May 18, 2011
462
0
0
I'm 40 next year and have been cycling semi seriously again for the last few years (after nearly 20 years).

I'd like to think that I will improve without the need to take "crack". :mad:
 
Race Radio said:
Yup, All 45 year old's have legs like that

4591248544_981d410037_b.jpg

....Daddy...where'd your peenie go?
 
Berzin said:
Let's set a few things straight here.

There is no such thing as an "anti-aging" doctor. Anti-aging is not a recognized field of medicine. You cannot specialize in a type of medicine that is not officially practiced or recognized as a practice.

Also, willing, compliant and "anti-aging doctor" pretty much go hand in hand. They are in business to sell to any client who can pay, regardless of what the medical necessity is. These quacks are not endocrinologists but people who practice other types of medicine (many aren't even real doctors) who then get into this gray area of medicine simply and purely for the profit.

And the profit does not lie in the practice of monitoring endocrine levels but in the selling of steroids and HgH, which as I'm sure you know can be found a lot cheaper if one has a pipeline to a source that frequently travels through Central/South America and/or the Caribbean.

Tú no eres el único que sabes, compadre.


It is better to be thought of an as idiotic, than to post on a forum and remove all doubt.
 
Mar 10, 2009
42
0
0
You guys are so quick to judge, this straightens everything out :roll eyes:

Statement written by Tony Byatt as a translation service for Roger Hernandez of Miami, Florida, as to reasons for refusal to submit to a post race, in competition drug test:

I was confused as a result of a very long day of competition and just losing a second race to a talented competitor. Passion and temper were both running high.

After thirty years as a competitor in the sport, I always thought that it was the winner that was to be tested. Had I won, I would have gladly submitted but as a second place finisher, I felt that there was some ulterior motive to the test.

It was explained to me that the test was random. However, the transparency to this randomness was non existent. No presentation was made to the riders as to what number or what finisher was to be tested. Once, again, I felt that I was being singled out for undisclosed reasons.

I was concerned that my image could be damaged by a urine test whose testing procedures and laboratory affiliations were unknown to me. In light of all of the recent high profile allegations about drug tests being manipulated in one way or another, I was not sure that a fair test was possible.

I also felt that I had been unjustly selected as the only Hispanic person on the podium. There was a general strangeness to how all of the events passed.

After returning to the hotel and calming down, some of the procedures were explained to me in my own language that I might better understand. Once I understood that the bottles are sealed by me, that I could request split labs or additional samples for independent lab testing, I returned to the velodrome the following morning to present myself for testing. The USADA officials called to see if it would be allowed and the determination was made that I would not be allowed to test, having previously refused. It should be noted that I arrived within 12 hours of the original test request and, to my knowledge, there exists no method of sanitizing a sample in so short a period. For this reason, Janet Bailey, of the USADA asked that I prepare a statement as to my reasons for refusal at the first request. Between the language barrier and my unfamiliarity with the procedures, the culmination of a long, hard day of competition, and a second place performance, I was in no way prepared to submit myself to what I felt was a personal attack.

Respectfully Submitted
 
Hooptie said:
You guys are so quick to judge, this straightens everything out :roll eyes:

Statement written by Tony Byatt as a translation service for Roger Hernandez of Miami, Florida, as to reasons for refusal to submit to a post race, in competition drug test:

I was confused as a result of a very long day of competition and just losing a second race to a talented competitor. Passion and temper were both running high.

After thirty years as a competitor in the sport, I always thought that it was the winner that was to be tested. Had I won, I would have gladly submitted but as a second place finisher, I felt that there was some ulterior motive to the test.

It was explained to me that the test was random. However, the transparency to this randomness was non existent. No presentation was made to the riders as to what number or what finisher was to be tested. Once, again, I felt that I was being singled out for undisclosed reasons.

I was concerned that my image could be damaged by a urine test whose testing procedures and laboratory affiliations were unknown to me. In light of all of the recent high profile allegations about drug tests being manipulated in one way or another, I was not sure that a fair test was possible.

I also felt that I had been unjustly selected as the only Hispanic person on the podium. There was a general strangeness to how all of the events passed.

After returning to the hotel and calming down, some of the procedures were explained to me in my own language that I might better understand. Once I understood that the bottles are sealed by me, that I could request split labs or additional samples for independent lab testing, I returned to the velodrome the following morning to present myself for testing. The USADA officials called to see if it would be allowed and the determination was made that I would not be allowed to test, having previously refused. It should be noted that I arrived within 12 hours of the original test request and, to my knowledge, there exists no method of sanitizing a sample in so short a period. For this reason, Janet Bailey, of the USADA asked that I prepare a statement as to my reasons for refusal at the first request. Between the language barrier and my unfamiliarity with the procedures, the culmination of a long, hard day of competition, and a second place performance, I was in no way prepared to submit myself to what I felt was a personal attack.

Respectfully Submitted

This is BS and he must think people are stupid if he thinks this will wash. And as for playing the racism card, that in itself deserves a ban.

Maybe he was target tested because it's obvious he needs to be tested. Turning up the following day is just an excuse to make it all seem plausible. Well done for banning him.
 
It was explained to me that the test was random. However, the transparency to this randomness was non existent. No presentation was made to the riders as to what number or what finisher was to be tested. Once, again, I felt that I was being singled out for undisclosed reasons.

Apparently, someone needs to better explain the definition of "random" to Mr. Hernandez.:rolleyes:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Hooptie said:
You guys are so quick to judge, this straightens everything out :roll eyes:

Statement written by Tony Byatt as a translation service for Roger Hernandez of Miami, Florida, as to reasons for refusal to submit to a post race, in competition drug test:

I was confused as a result of a very long day of competition and just losing a second race to a talented competitor. Passion and temper were both running high.

After thirty years as a competitor in the sport, I always thought that it was the winner that was to be tested. Had I won, I would have gladly submitted but as a second place finisher, I felt that there was some ulterior motive to the test.

It was explained to me that the test was random. However, the transparency to this randomness was non existent. No presentation was made to the riders as to what number or what finisher was to be tested. Once, again, I felt that I was being singled out for undisclosed reasons.

I was concerned that my image could be damaged by a urine test whose testing procedures and laboratory affiliations were unknown to me. In light of all of the recent high profile allegations about drug tests being manipulated in one way or another, I was not sure that a fair test was possible.

I also felt that I had been unjustly selected as the only Hispanic person on the podium. There was a general strangeness to how all of the events passed.

After returning to the hotel and calming down, some of the procedures were explained to me in my own language that I might better understand. Once I understood that the bottles are sealed by me, that I could request split labs or additional samples for independent lab testing, I returned to the velodrome the following morning to present myself for testing. The USADA officials called to see if it would be allowed and the determination was made that I would not be allowed to test, having previously refused. It should be noted that I arrived within 12 hours of the original test request and, to my knowledge, there exists no method of sanitizing a sample in so short a period. For this reason, Janet Bailey, of the USADA asked that I prepare a statement as to my reasons for refusal at the first request. Between the language barrier and my unfamiliarity with the procedures, the culmination of a long, hard day of competition, and a second place performance, I was in no way prepared to submit myself to what I felt was a personal attack.

Respectfully Submitted

He could have just written "I was doped to the gills on roids" and we would have all said "yea, it was obvious." A man with real balls would have just admitted his offense and moved on. However, I guess having tiny raisin roid shrunken balls changes things.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
Hooptie said:
You guys are so quick to judge, this straightens everything out :roll eyes:

Statement written by Tony Byatt as a translation service for Roger Hernandez of Miami, Florida, as to reasons for refusal to submit to a post race, in competition drug test:

I was confused as a result of a very long day of competition and just losing a second race to a talented competitor. Passion and temper were both running high.

After thirty years as a competitor in the sport, I always thought that it was the winner that was to be tested. Had I won, I would have gladly submitted but as a second place finisher, I felt that there was some ulterior motive to the test.

It was explained to me that the test was random. However, the transparency to this randomness was non existent. No presentation was made to the riders as to what number or what finisher was to be tested. Once, again, I felt that I was being singled out for undisclosed reasons.

I was concerned that my image could be damaged by a urine test whose testing procedures and laboratory affiliations were unknown to me. In light of all of the recent high profile allegations about drug tests being manipulated in one way or another, I was not sure that a fair test was possible.

I also felt that I had been unjustly selected as the only Hispanic person on the podium. There was a general strangeness to how all of the events passed.

After returning to the hotel and calming down, some of the procedures were explained to me in my own language that I might better understand. Once I understood that the bottles are sealed by me, that I could request split labs or additional samples for independent lab testing, I returned to the velodrome the following morning to present myself for testing. The USADA officials called to see if it would be allowed and the determination was made that I would not be allowed to test, having previously refused. It should be noted that I arrived within 12 hours of the original test request and, to my knowledge, there exists no method of sanitizing a sample in so short a period. For this reason, Janet Bailey, of the USADA asked that I prepare a statement as to my reasons for refusal at the first request. Between the language barrier and my unfamiliarity with the procedures, the culmination of a long, hard day of competition, and a second place performance, I was in no way prepared to submit myself to what I felt was a personal attack.

Respectfully Submitted

It is good to see that Fabiani is picking up more clients
 
Jul 30, 2009
1,735
0
0
Good grief!! What races are there where being built like that is an advantage?

Put some slopes on your courses and that will reduce this kind of problem surely?

I've spent the last 10 years trying to get rid of the bulk I put on playing rugby in my teens and early twenties* - I struggle to understand why you would want to bulk up like that - for cycling anyway

( *and drinking and being a wage slave in my late 20s and 30s )
 
Sep 13, 2010
546
0
0
Winterfold said:
Good grief!! What races are there where being built like that is an advantage?

Put some slopes on your courses and that will reduce this kind of problem surely?

I've spent the last 10 years trying to get rid of the bulk I put on playing rugby in my teens and early twenties* - I struggle to understand why you would want to bulk up like that - for cycling anyway

( *and drinking and being a wage slave in my late 20s and 30s )

He raced track, but there are lots of people who believe it makes them fast on the road. I wonder why: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDawlrIeaVM. Reading the comments is a hoot.