Teams & Riders Tom Dumoulin discussion thread

Page 15 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Re:

Miburo said:
Poursuivant said:
Did anyone, anywhere, fan or within the sport, predict this performance from Dumoulin?

Just like with froome and armstrong no one saw it coming.

Anyone who saw the 1998 Vuelta should have seen Armstrong coming, I certainly did. He was riding with the Big Boys in the high mountains and finished 4th overall.

Froome well that's a totally different story, the mystery of the last 50+ years.
 
Re: Re:

Carols said:
Miburo said:
Poursuivant said:
Did anyone, anywhere, fan or within the sport, predict this performance from Dumoulin?

Just like with froome and armstrong no one saw it coming.

Anyone who saw the 1998 Vuelta should have seen Armstrong coming, I certainly did. He was riding with the Big Boys in the high mountains and finished 4th overall.

Froome well that's a totally different story, the mystery of the last 50+ years.

If a rider that came from Africa, with little experience, who rode le Tour as forst Gt with 23 years , he has to help Soler, but he crash, latter Hunter becouse the team was just 4 riders, and he go with the best at the end of the queen stage and he did 2 very good ITT, epecially the last one, you think that i a surprise he won le Tour several years later we have different views from cycling.

What showed Lance in GT before that Vuelta? anything, anyway it was something possible.

Dumoulin has always had good results, he is in a good age to start showing his potential for GC, so it is not a big surprise... there are always a lot of riders under 26 who can have that potential, but the answer is just given by the time, you cant say, ou, Ulissi was 2 time wordl champion, he will be very good, that is nothing in order to be a GT contender with 28.

For instance, I see Verona doing things well, he didnt showed anything important already, he is 22, if he never is in a top ten of a GT I wont be surprised, but if he one day win TdF I wont be surprised as well.

There are a lot of riders you cant rule out from that, and of course Froome and Dumoulin were among them.

Froome showed always a good talent for ITT and for climbs at the same time, he improved quickly form bad results, and it was clear he has a lot to improve, phisically, but mainly in experience.

Dumoulin has been more progresive, he is more like Indurain, a big engine who needed to improve in the mountains.

He was top ten in Vuelta a Burgos in his first year of pro with 21... if you consider his result now as a big surprised , you dont understand anything about cycling.


Of coursre there are riders like Quintana, Aru, who from the begining start with very good results and form the begining has people to work for them and no problems with crash and illness, but that is not the only way to get the top, that is just one way.
 
In the quotes you put he was just 19, and you said:

I was following this race specifically watching for the American Ben King..who showed well by the way. Dumoulin really surprised me too...not much about him available. Pretty young...strong...good future?? What are the Dutch expectations for him?

And he was always improving and improving:

With 23 he was 5 in swisse...it would be a surprise he won la Vuelta with 24? You are improving always till 28, especially till after you first pro year, till 25. if you have a bad year for a crash, illness, personal problems, ..., you can mis one year and jump a lot the next, but in the cae of Domoulin.. he did very good ITTR in his first Tour, better than Contador, Valverde,,,he was in some good breaks,,,and he was improving year by year, a perfect curve:

http://www.cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/graphRiderHistory.asp?riderID=16677

ity is not necesary to have a perfect curve to show a year all your potential, but in this case is so clear, if you follow that curve you have a lot of points, and if you follow result in Tours you get this is not a surprise. I didnt followed him, but now if i see his career this is logical.
 
Jan 25, 2010
264
0
0
Re: Re:

Mongolian Torque said:
IndianCyclist said:
Carols said:
Dekker_Tifosi said:
Yeah, Froome was way more surprising. In fact Froome still is the most surprising GT winner ever and most surprising evolution ever.

Dumoulin at least had a 5th and a 3rd place in the tour de suisse. Froome had.. wel what? a 30th place on Alpe once

Difficult to disagree with this. Froome never showed an iota of talent pre-transformation.

Dumoulin certainly did.
Dumoulin is more Wiggins like


Yes- Dumoggins....

However, definitely not Dumoroome...

Froome for all of Sky's considerable efforts afforded to him including fancy meals, hotels, wind tunnels and Pinarello's , has yielded exactly TWO grand tour victories.

If Dumo wins the Vuelta, he will have exactly ONE less than Froome. Dumo's team extravagance includes travelling in a 1972 VW camper van eating beans and wieners over a Coleman stove and sleeping on a leaky air mattress. Then he goes to races where his team is completely obliterated at the sight of any incline and then he manages by himself to hang on to Sky- like teams where four or five guys deliver their guy to the foot of the hill on a silver platter.

What is there not to like about this guy?

Is this really true? The team extravagances?
 
Memories from the Troféu Cidade da Guarda.

i_0002684.jpg
 
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
Re: Re:

Carols said:
Miburo said:
Poursuivant said:
Did anyone, anywhere, fan or within the sport, predict this performance from Dumoulin?

Just like with froome and armstrong no one saw it coming.

Anyone who saw the 1998 Vuelta should have seen Armstrong coming, I certainly did. He was riding with the Big Boys in the high mountains and finished 4th overall.

Froome well that's a totally different story, the mystery of the last 50+ years.
***, i am in the wrong subforum.
 
Jul 21, 2010
72
2
8,685
Re: Re:

Poursuivant said:
akrogirl said:
Poursuivant said:
Did anyone, anywhere, fan or within the sport, predict this performance from Dumoulin?

I thought he had a good chance of making the podium, and I have my husband as a witness ;-)

Before the start though? And be honest!
Yes, I honestly did. I have been watching him carefully since he joined Giant, and I did think he had a bit of advantage after having had to abandon the Tour. A win? Maybe not. Podium, yes.
 
Re: Re:

Carols said:
Miburo said:
Poursuivant said:
Did anyone, anywhere, fan or within the sport, predict this performance from Dumoulin?

Just like with froome and armstrong no one saw it coming.

Anyone who saw the 1998 Vuelta should have seen Armstrong coming, I certainly did. He was riding with the Big Boys in the high mountains and finished 4th overall.

Froome well that's a totally different story, the mystery of the last 50+ years.

Err, he rode very well on exactly one mountain stage and 1 ITT. He was 19th, 18th and 11th in the 3 previous MTFs in an average Vuelta on a poor route.

Edit: and considering how he seems to like the rain, it's no a guarantee that he would have finished the Navacerrada stage that high in better weather.
 
Could Dumoulin be one of the very rare modern riders who could compete in the classics and be a GC man?

He's such a breath of fresh air as I'm fed up of climbers winning GTs, although I do like Contador's never say die attitude and Horner's win against the odds, but give me pure power any day!

I think Dumoulin is what Wiggins might have been had he concentrated purely on road rather than both track and road.
 
Re:

elfed68 said:
Could Dumoulin be one of the very rare modern riders who could compete in the classics and be a GC man?

He's such a breath of fresh air as I'm fed up of climbers winning GTs, although I do like Contador's never say die attitude and Horner's win against the odds, but give me pure power any day!

I think Dumoulin is what Wiggins might have been had he concentrated purely on road rather than both track and road.
Let's hope so; it would be good to have a true all rounder. It's early days yet though, he's still lost time in this race on every major mountains stage, and now that he will be taken seriously as a GC threat, it's unlikely in the future that he'll be able to slip under the radar and pick up time in the first week.

I think the comparison with Wiggins is way off though - apart from the obvious TT similarities. Dumoulin is much more explosive and so much more likely to succeed in one day races. Wiggins was far too one paced to consistently make decisive attacks in one day races; there's only so much you can do to train that.
 
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
elfed68 said:
Could Dumoulin be one of the very rare modern riders who could compete in the classics and be a GC man?

He's such a breath of fresh air as I'm fed up of climbers winning GTs, although I do like Contador's never say die attitude and Horner's win against the odds, but give me pure power any day!

I think Dumoulin is what Wiggins might have been had he concentrated purely on road rather than both track and road.
Let's hope so; it would be good to have a true all rounder. It's early days yet though, he's still lost time in this race on every major mountains stage, and now that he will be taken seriously as a GC threat, it's unlikely in the future that he'll be able to slip under the radar and pick up time in the first week.

I think the comparison with Wiggins is way off though - apart from the obvious TT similarities. Dumoulin is much more explosive and so much more likely to succeed in one day races. Wiggins was far too one paced to consistently make decisive attacks in one day races; there's only so much you can do to train that.

Dumoulin seems very calm and very confident of his abilities, the opposite of Wiggins, maybe that's the difference.