• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tour de France Tour de France 2024: Stage 19: Embrun - Isola 2000, 19/07 144.6k

Page 46 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I think Pogacar may as well do the Vuelta ...wont take too much out of him and then he can really stick it to Visma who got 3 GT wins s last year with 3 riders and he can get 3 with one rider, himself

He seems to want to constantly show his dominance so why stop here
Also Armstrong warned about that the other day.

In his interviews Pog doesnt fail to say how hard every thing is ...The Bonette was so hard ? yeah maybe for Neils Pollitt
 
That's a little harsh, man. I don't think he humiliated Jonas. Ofc they believed in him but there were 2 huge unknowns, one being Pogs shape after the Giro and Jonas' ability to go deep in multiple mountain stages.
The way Pog rode against Vinge all this tour, "the look" on PdB, sprinting when there's no need and today, the Slovenian did everything to put Vinge in his place. Maybe it's harsh to say humiliation or demolition but it's 5 minutes with 2 stages to go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHAD0W93
I don't think we've seen yet how good this guy can be.

VEY95gB6kzD6JMWdqwo8VJ-1200-80.jpg.webp
 
I don't think the Tour de France GC, something which has been won multiple times in a row at multiple points, is something that has a "massive pool of potential winners" op. eras like 06-11 are not exactly common.
I'm not really talking about the TDF GC, post was more in the context of cycling as a whole relative to Pogacar/Vingegaard's dominance in every race of the past few years.

Of course there will always be the occasional surprise and I still enjoy it in parts, but the classics, one weekers and Tour stages do seem to be becoming a bit more of a closed shop.
 
Their logic is that having a few guys winning everything and do battle against each other will draw in a casual audience because it doesn't require the same attention-span and can be condensed into 5 minute YouTube shorts and Netflix documentaries. The problem is that it isn't the reason a lot of us posting here watch, cycling historically has been a long-form sport that rewarded engagement and attention to detail with its massive pool of potential winners and this is what we became accustomed to, the assumption we worked under.

Contrast the discourse of younger posters on reddit/twitter with the mood on here right now, the sport to varying degrees has always required a suspension of belief that is completely gone amongst most fans that have been paying attention for any period of time, but the money keeps on rolling in and the newer fans are pouring in.

The bubble will burst eventually as usual, and these once new fans (the ones that stick around) will become cynical trolls like myself, but for now unfortunately our opinions are a bit irrelevant.

There is still plenty of cycling to enjoy, so I continue to watch, but if any new fan might happen to see this post, don't deify these top guys, don't hold them on a pedestal, because they will just let you down, they always do.
If you look at all forms of bike racing, subscription service and social media have a million times more access to races and racers. All kinds of everything, individual, team bus,training camps, visiting w riders at home. If you think about how much access, no information about anything was the standard. These back stories are helpful all around. You see stories like yesterday..Victor Campenaerts, Ving, Pog, they have brought Peter Sagan popularity to the next levels. Gives fans something, someone to follow.
Lemond got blasted with a shotgun and his story was consolidated to what American network TV worked up, 2-3 minutes of special coverage on race day of TDF. Almost nothing. Roglic ski jumper story not really exploited much, social media was not the story telling tool as it is currently. Putting riders on a pedestal, the hype, the build up is exactly how other sports succeed, boxing,golf,tennis, they all have a orchestrated hype of rivalry or personal stories that people love. Watching people fail is part of the fun..when Pogacar is standing on earth again, and he will, the story will be great..
 
Their logic is that having a few guys winning everything and do battle against each other will draw in a casual audience because it doesn't require the same attention-span and can be condensed into 5 minute YouTube shorts and Netflix documentaries. The problem is that it isn't the reason a lot of us posting here watch, cycling historically has been a long-form sport that rewarded engagement and attention to detail with its massive pool of potential winners and this is what we became accustomed to, the assumption we worked under.

Contrast the discourse of younger posters on reddit/twitter with the mood on here right now, the sport to varying degrees has always required a suspension of belief that is completely gone amongst most fans that have been paying attention for any period of time, but the money keeps on rolling in and the newer fans are pouring in.

The bubble will burst eventually as usual, and these once new fans (the ones that stick around) will become cynical trolls like myself, but for now unfortunately our opinions are a bit irrelevant.

There is still plenty of cycling to enjoy, so I continue to watch, but if any new fan might happen to see this post, don't deify these top guys, don't hold them on a pedestal, because they will just let you down, they always do.
It’s called ****ification. This is what happens when everything is made for the masses and not the real fans.
 
I'm not really talking about the TDF GC, post was more in the context of cycling as a whole relative to Pogacar/Vingegaard's dominance in every race of the past few years.

Of course there will always be the occasional surprise and I still enjoy it in parts, but the classics, one weekers and Tour stages do seem to be becoming a bit more of a closed shop.
i think the one days were down to a special case where absolutely every single contender seemed completely incapable of staying uninjured at the same time