Merckx index said:I had hoped the book would solve the mystery of the HBT positive, but it doesn't. A footnote says that Ashenden speculated that during the process of freezing RBCs, they might have become contaminated with someone else's blood. Given that Fuentes had so many clients, I can imagine that could happen. This is also consistent with the fact that the actual test data indicated a very minor contamination, not the larger amount that would occur with a month or so following a transfusion. But Tyler had two positives--the Olympics and the Vuelta--and they involved different minor antigens, i.e., different blood samples. So there would have to be two slip-ups, not one.
All Good points. totally agree.icebreaker said:Has McQuaid questioned whether Armstrong has shown remorse for the damage he has done to the sport?
Of course not, Armstrong has not done any damage because he didn't talk.
McQuaid just keeps digging. Idiot. Pathetic.
icebreaker said:There are many details that are frankly mind boggling ( the Spaniard who couldn't afford the good program!?)
But the part of the book that really ****es me off the most is in the last chapter. The details around the "closure" of the US Federal investigation. Thos details should cause more than a few raised eyebrows.
ManInFull said:Yeah, Tyler points out how shocked he was when he learned that Fuentes was providing his services to a significant portion of the peleton. With so many clients paying him to freeze their blood, Fuentes was bound to make a mistake. The process of freezing blood is much more complex than the one required to simply refrigerate blood.
KayLow said:Is the process of properly labeling blood more complicated when it is being frozen than when it is being refrigerated? I don't think a careful, competent person would mix up blood bags no matter how many of them there were.
I Watch Cycling In July said:Didn't realize that about Bassons either, makes what was done to him even more outrageous IMO.
There's a lot of information to digest from the book. For example, how many known instances of dodgy blood can we now attribute to Fuentes? Hamilton during the 04 tour (perhaps explaining the Olympic positive) then the homologous positive from the 04 Veulta, that is at least 2 maybe 3 instances of dodgy Fuentes managed blood. It appears that Vino was also a Fuentes customer popped for homologous, another mixup there.....what other Fuentes blood stuff up incidents do we know about? Manzano? That's a pretty sobering catalogue of incompetence already.
Cloxxki said:We know from Operacion Galgo that Fuentes like to use that immigrant, Bezabeh (sp) as a bit of a guinea pig. Guy was pretty much unbeatable in cross-country running. And conveniently, in cross you don't get sureal split times as red flag, just competition all having a bad day.
Indeed. It clearly matches Riis' propensity to different excuses (allegedly broken Tyler's collarbone, fake Contador's knee and now stomache trouble with Basso). And then we are obviously approaching to a misterious cowboy who lose 1'30 to Ulle in the TT in the Tour 2003. It was rumored Lance lost 2 or 3 kilos then.Epicycle said:An incident I've suspected was a screw-up by Fuentes' team was Basso on the Stelvio in the 2005 Giro. Ivan was in second on GC until he got really sick on stage 13. It culminated with him breaking down on the Stelvio, I remember Bjarne getting out of the car and draping a coat over Basso near the top of the climb. Of course at the time it was reported that Ivan had stomach trouble. He had a "miraculous" comeback, winning two stages, and would have won the overall if not for the miserable day on stage 13.
jyhjyh said:You are wrong JPM.
I think that Hamilton, Armstrong and Riis all lie.
What I don't think, is that every word that Hamilton writes is the truth.
And what does he not write about and why?
Everybody who has been or is involved in doping lies or hides facts about it.
After the November election? I do think it likely political motives were behind the decision to close the investigation. However, I doubt it will be reopened. Although I'd love to see that happen.ManInFull said:I believe it was a political decision. Some think that a criminal indictment might come at a later date.
That was definitely a huge upset. I was really surprised about that outcome and thought we would be getting a great Tour de France.airstream said:Indeed. It clearly matches Riis' propensity to different excuses (allegedly broken Tyler's collarbone, fake Contador's knee and now stomache trouble with Basso). And then we are obviously approaching to a misterious cowboy who lose 1'30 to Ulle in the TT in the Tour 2003. It was rumored Lance lost 2 or 3 kilos then.
the big ring said:Can anyone attest to remorse in the book? Has it even been released in Switzerland yet?
Merckx index said:I had hoped the book would solve the mystery of the HBT positive, but it doesn't. A footnote says that Ashenden speculated that during the process of freezing RBCs, they might have become contaminated with someone else's blood. Given that Fuentes had so many clients, I can imagine that could happen. This is also consistent with the fact that the actual test data indicated a very minor contamination, not the larger amount that would occur with a month or so following a transfusion. But Tyler had two positives--the Olympics and the Vuelta--and they involved different minor antigens, i.e., different blood samples. So there would have to be two slip-ups, not one.
Suggest you (we) all flag his comment.VeloGirl said:So, I just read all of the reviews on Amazon - overwhelming good reviews.
However, there is this creepy guy commenting on EVERY single review...he and admits he has not read the book.
airstream said:And then we are obviously approaching to a misterious cowboy who lose 1'30 to Ulle in the TT in the Tour 2003. It was rumored Lance lost 2 or 3 kilos then.
Berzin said:I heard it was a bad blood bag, which to me makes more sense than the old "dehydration" excuse.
I Watch Cycling In July said:The freezing process is much more complicated and involves mixing in glycol in several steps to prevent the RBCs getting damaged by freezing. If blood from different riders was being processed at the same time, I guess mixups might be possible....maybe even improper cleaning of equipment?
The book suggest Fuents' assistant had dementia which may have caused the problems.
Berzin said:I heard it was a bad blood bag, which to me makes more sense than the old "dehydration" excuse.