JimmyFingers said:Fair enough, but that is conjecture, I prefer to deal with hard facts. Froome legally got a performance enhancing drug during a UCI race. That isn't right, forever that performance should have an asterisk next to it.
I will say it is symptomatic of a sport that puts its riders under huge pressures, a sheer physical overload. I read comments of Wiggins withdrawal from TdS and you see we expect riders like him and Froome to perform and if they don't it is addressed with scorn and cynicism. So you're faced with that: Froome dropped out of LBL, and I saw comments here about Sky were disrespecting the race, then at Romandie he still has the same problem, but this time he takes a TUE and continues.
I'm not saying the criticism a rider gets for under-performing or dropping out is the reason some may dope, but it is symptomatic on the pressure put on riders by the teams, the media, the fans, the sponsors, the need for world tour points.
It's a brutal sport, but we must respect the riders need for medical treatment, and that means collectively trying not to back them into a corner to perform whatever their condition and not simply firing bile in their direction. If a rider is sick, then they shouldn't be racing, and we shouldn't be lining up to judge them for that, we should be praising them for it.
This is a very good post. Even if you take Froome's tue completely at face value, it tells a story about cycling that reflects badly on everyone involved - the rider, the team, the organisers, and the fans as well.