USADA-Armstrong Phase II

Page 40 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
DirtyWorks said:
Officially, the answer is they are waiting for USADA's documentation. Why another much bigger IOC-blessed federation just enforced the dope-pusher ban out of the same USADA action remains an interesting contrast.

I think they are going to try to void USADA's actions. I could be wrong though. They would need something brilliant so as not to anger the IOC. I've not seen anything resembling brilliance from Pat's office.

Not just "IOC-blessed," but also a member of the UCI. Looks like the French federation is willing to defy the spirit of McQuaid's letters to USADA and USA Cycling.
 

LauraLyn

BANNED
Jul 13, 2012
594
0
0
MarkvW said:
But the UCI is based in Switzerland! Verstehen? Glory, not so much. Decline, not so much. But cuckoo clocks! Ja!!

Il faut dire : Tu comprends?

It is in a French canton. (Apologies for being pedantic as well.)
 

LauraLyn

BANNED
Jul 13, 2012
594
0
0
MarkvW said:
Not just "IOC-blessed," but also a member of the UCI. Looks like the French federation is willing to defy the spirit of McQuaid's letters to USADA and USA Cycling.

Seems more like the FFC and the UCI are aligned when reading the letter. (Could be wrong.)

An important point is that this could be an indication that the ASO is lining up with USADA (as far as Armstrong & Co. goes). This would be a very strong move for USADA.

Still in wait & see mode.
 
Apr 10, 2009
106
0
0
LauraLyn said:
Il faut dire : Tu comprends?

It is in a French canton. (Apologies for being pedantic as well.)

More pedantry from me too, not so much cuckoo clocks but the best watches and movements on earth.

A couple of years ago there was an argument between FFC, ASO and UCI before the TdF, was it over testing? UCI kicked AFLD off the tour ....2009 maybe?
 
LauraLyn said:
Seems more like the FFC and the UCI are aligned when reading the letter. (Could be wrong.)

An important point is that this could be an indication that the ASO is lining up with USADA (as far as Armstrong & Co. goes). This would be a very strong move for USADA.

Still in wait & see mode.

I'd bet you were right. I think the UCI may be moving away from McDruggin's position.
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
MarkvW said:
python said:
this is probably an indication that a world-wide pressure is about to be exerted on the uci NOT to appeal and step aside...or else.

likely the consequence of ffc receiving an unofficial (or draft) reasoned letter that the usada owed to uci, armstrong and wada and that was due last tuesday.

i find the reference to return those fraud-assisted prize money particularly ominous - a nod to aso to sue if the subject refused to do so and.... that the uci may find itself in courts too if it does not go along ;):D


Interesting theory. Bums me out if we're not getting to see the reasoned letter (that marks 'victory' for me). It would explain the deployment of Shrill Shill Phil at this time, though.
i'd not argue that my guess is a 'theory' as you said - however, mine was a reasoned and logical projection about the 'reasoned' decision/lettter everyone was awaiting the past tuesday.

i reckoned the usada sent some sympathetic sports organizations (like ffc) a courtesy copy concurrent with the official copies to wada and the uci.

it took ffc a day or 2 to digest the evidence summary from the letter, ring their lawyers and the aso opinion and finally issue the communique.

the time line seems perfect plus the fact the ffc had a chance to speak earlier but did not until the reasoned letter was received.
 
python said:
i'd not argue that my guess is a 'theory' as you said - however, mine was a reasoned and logical projection about the 'reasoned' decision/lettter everyone was awaiting the past tuesday.

i reckoned the usada sent some sympathetic sports organizations (like ffc) a courtesy copy concurrent with the official copies to wada and the uci.

it took ffc a day or 2 to digest the evidence summary from the letter, ring their lawyers and the aso opinion and finally issue the communique.

the time line seems perfect plus the fact the ffc had a chance to speak earlier but did not until the reasoned letter was received.

I used 'theory' because it is a plausible guess supported by facts and I can't disprove it. Best explanation I've seen so far,
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
python said:
i'd not argue that my guess is a 'theory' as you said - however, mine was a reasoned and logical projection about the 'reasoned' decision/lettter everyone was awaiting the past tuesday.

i reckoned the usada sent some sympathetic sports organizations (like ffc) a courtesy copy concurrent with the official copies to wada and the uci.

it took ffc a day or 2 to digest the evidence summary from the letter, ring their lawyers and the aso opinion and finally issue the communique.

the time line seems perfect plus the fact the ffc had a chance to speak earlier but did not until the reasoned letter was received.

I agree with you, I guess UCI are in talks with Swiss lawyers, IOC and their own bods trying to find a way out. I guess McQuaid is trying to negotiate his own a$$.
 
Apr 10, 2009
106
0
0
The president of FFC spoke on French TV during the GP de Plouay on Sunday supporting
USADA, pretty much what is said today.
 
Apr 17, 2009
402
0
9,280
LauraLyn said:
Seems more like the FFC and the UCI are aligned when reading the letter. (Could be wrong.)

An important point is that this could be an indication that the ASO is lining up with USADA (as far as Armstrong & Co. goes). This would be a very strong move for USADA.

Still in wait & see mode.

SCA would be licking their chops with this move. My understanding is that the initial ruling was because doping wasn't a part of the deal, it was merely that Lance had to win the Tour. If ASO does what they did with Riis and leave his name as winner then Lance could argue that he is still the winner and doesn't have to return the money. But once ASO takes his name off the books then SCA should jump all over it.
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
Benotti69 said:
I agree with you, I guess UCI are in talks with Swiss lawyers, IOC and their own bods trying to find a way out. I guess McQuaid is trying to negotiate his own a$$.
:D add usada - the captain of the ship and THE king of the castle - to that list ;)

as i mentioned earlier, the uci desperately need the usada to take the evidence of uci's corruption off the table. in return, the uci can promise NOT to appeal and even throw in some freebies like the promise NOT to charge with doping the usada witnesses (beyond usada's own arrangements) and even give usada access to armstrong's test data usada ask for and so far was denied.

i've sat on several corporate boards as a technical/science man and witnessed the deals like that all the time.
 
Jul 19, 2009
949
0
0
Condorman said:
More pedantry from me too, not so much cuckoo clocks but the best watches and movements on earth.
I can do better than that : the swiss cuckoo clocks are a copy of the famous cuckoo clocks from Black Forest (Schwarzwald ) !
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
Condorman said:
The president of FFC spoke on French TV during the GP de Plouay on Sunday supporting
USADA, pretty much what is said today.

Interesting how the US Federation is so much less supportive...hmmm...wonder if there is a complicity on their part keeping them from being more supportive?
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
python said:
:D add usada - the captain of the ship and THE king of the castle - to that list ;)

as i mentioned earlier, the uci desperately need the usada to take the evidence of uci's corruption off the table. in return, the uci can promise NOT to appeal and even throw in some freebies like the promise NOT to charge with doping the usada witnesses (beyond usada's own arrangements) and even give usada access to armstrong's test data usada ask for and so far was denied.

i've sat on several corporate boards as a technical/science man and witnessed the deals like that all the time.

I really hope they are negotiating the end of McQuaid and an acceptance of USADA stripping Wonderboy.

If UCI isnt forced to change it will mean the sport will still be dirty for the foreseable future.
 
python said:
:D add usada - the captain of the ship and THE king of the castle - to that list ;)

as i mentioned earlier, the uci desperately need the usada to take the evidence of uci's corruption off the table. in return, the uci can promise NOT to appeal and even throw in some freebies like the promise NOT to charge with doping the usada witnesses (beyond usada's own arrangements) and even give usada access to armstrong's test data usada ask for and so far was denied.

i've sat on several corporate boards as a technical/science man and witnessed the deals like that all the time.

I don't see USADA willing to deal. Their goal IIRC was going after facilitators. If the stories are true, what more valuable doping facilitators than those in the UCI itself? Lance is a done deal. Wada has spoken. They can appeal to CAS over witnesses, but that would be a very public affair.
 
Just out of curiosity.. Are test examples of Lance's blood stored somewhere? I mean, surely technology will catch up what appeared to be negatives and turn them into postive tests for doping in the future, eh?
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
ToreBear said:
I don't see USADA willing to deal. Their goal IIRC was going after facilitators. If the stories are true, what more valuable doping facilitators than those in the UCI itself? Lance is a done deal. Wada has spoken. They can appeal to CAS over witnesses, but that would be a very public affair.
i agree, the likelihood of a usada-uci deal is a remote one.

but it does not mean the uci wont seek one or that some 3d parties wont attempt to broker one.

a lot depends on politics and, in my assessment, the strength and resolve of wada's support for usada. so far, there is no reason to believe that wada wavered.

another factor here is this - at the end of the day, usada is not chartered to change corrupt leadership of any international federation. it would be too ambitious of a goal for their $15 million dollar budget.
 
May 20, 2010
718
1
0
python said:
i agree, the likelihood of a usada-uci deal is a remote one.

but it does not mean the uci wont seek one or that some 3d parties wont attempt to broker one.

a lot depends on politics and, in my assessment, the strength and resolve of wada's support for usada. so far, there is no reason to believe that wada wavered.

another factor here is this - at the end of the day, usada is not chartered to change corrupt leadership of any international federation. it would be too ambitious of a goal for their $15 million dollar budget.

While not USADAs role ...I do not see them doing anything to facilitate a UCI coverup.