Deagol said:You are right and I didn't say that. What I did say is that this is the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
Sorry if I came off pedantic.
Deagol said:You are right and I didn't say that. What I did say is that this is the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
DirtyWorks said:Officially, the answer is they are waiting for USADA's documentation. Why another much bigger IOC-blessed federation just enforced the dope-pusher ban out of the same USADA action remains an interesting contrast.
I think they are going to try to void USADA's actions. I could be wrong though. They would need something brilliant so as not to anger the IOC. I've not seen anything resembling brilliance from Pat's office.
MarkvW said:But the UCI is based in Switzerland! Verstehen? Glory, not so much. Decline, not so much. But cuckoo clocks! Ja!!
MarkvW said:Not just "IOC-blessed," but also a member of the UCI. Looks like the French federation is willing to defy the spirit of McQuaid's letters to USADA and USA Cycling.
LauraLyn said:Seems more like the FFC and the UCI are aligned when reading the letter. (Could be wrong.)
LauraLyn said:Il faut dire : Tu comprends?
It is in a French canton. (Apologies for being pedantic as well.)
MarkvW said:But the UCI is based in Switzerland! Verstehen? Glory, not so much. Decline, not so much. But cuckoo clocks! Ja!!
LauraLyn said:Il faut dire : Tu comprends?
It is in a French canton. (Apologies for being pedantic as well.)
LauraLyn said:Seems more like the FFC and the UCI are aligned when reading the letter. (Could be wrong.)
An important point is that this could be an indication that the ASO is lining up with USADA (as far as Armstrong & Co. goes). This would be a very strong move for USADA.
Still in wait & see mode.
i'd not argue that my guess is a 'theory' as you said - however, mine was a reasoned and logical projection about the 'reasoned' decision/lettter everyone was awaiting the past tuesday.MarkvW said:python said:this is probably an indication that a world-wide pressure is about to be exerted on the uci NOT to appeal and step aside...or else.
likely the consequence of ffc receiving an unofficial (or draft) reasoned letter that the usada owed to uci, armstrong and wada and that was due last tuesday.
i find the reference to return those fraud-assisted prize money particularly ominous - a nod to aso to sue if the subject refused to do so and.... that the uci may find itself in courts too if it does not go along![]()
Interesting theory. Bums me out if we're not getting to see the reasoned letter (that marks 'victory' for me). It would explain the deployment of Shrill Shill Phil at this time, though.
python said:i'd not argue that my guess is a 'theory' as you said - however, mine was a reasoned and logical projection about the 'reasoned' decision/lettter everyone was awaiting the past tuesday.
i reckoned the usada sent some sympathetic sports organizations (like ffc) a courtesy copy concurrent with the official copies to wada and the uci.
it took ffc a day or 2 to digest the evidence summary from the letter, ring their lawyers and the aso opinion and finally issue the communique.
the time line seems perfect plus the fact the ffc had a chance to speak earlier but did not until the reasoned letter was received.
python said:i'd not argue that my guess is a 'theory' as you said - however, mine was a reasoned and logical projection about the 'reasoned' decision/lettter everyone was awaiting the past tuesday.
i reckoned the usada sent some sympathetic sports organizations (like ffc) a courtesy copy concurrent with the official copies to wada and the uci.
it took ffc a day or 2 to digest the evidence summary from the letter, ring their lawyers and the aso opinion and finally issue the communique.
the time line seems perfect plus the fact the ffc had a chance to speak earlier but did not until the reasoned letter was received.
LauraLyn said:Seems more like the FFC and the UCI are aligned when reading the letter. (Could be wrong.)
An important point is that this could be an indication that the ASO is lining up with USADA (as far as Armstrong & Co. goes). This would be a very strong move for USADA.
Still in wait & see mode.
Benotti69 said:I agree with you, I guess UCI are in talks with Swiss lawyers, IOC and their own bods trying to find a way out. I guess McQuaid is trying to negotiate his own a$$.
I can do better than that : the swiss cuckoo clocks are a copy of the famous cuckoo clocks from Black Forest (Schwarzwald ) !Condorman said:More pedantry from me too, not so much cuckoo clocks but the best watches and movements on earth.
Condorman said:The president of FFC spoke on French TV during the GP de Plouay on Sunday supporting
USADA, pretty much what is said today.
python said:add usada - the captain of the ship and THE king of the castle - to that list
as i mentioned earlier, the uci desperately need the usada to take the evidence of uci's corruption off the table. in return, the uci can promise NOT to appeal and even throw in some freebies like the promise NOT to charge with doping the usada witnesses (beyond usada's own arrangements) and even give usada access to armstrong's test data usada ask for and so far was denied.
i've sat on several corporate boards as a technical/science man and witnessed the deals like that all the time.
python said:add usada - the captain of the ship and THE king of the castle - to that list
as i mentioned earlier, the uci desperately need the usada to take the evidence of uci's corruption off the table. in return, the uci can promise NOT to appeal and even throw in some freebies like the promise NOT to charge with doping the usada witnesses (beyond usada's own arrangements) and even give usada access to armstrong's test data usada ask for and so far was denied.
i've sat on several corporate boards as a technical/science man and witnessed the deals like that all the time.
i agree, the likelihood of a usada-uci deal is a remote one.ToreBear said:I don't see USADA willing to deal. Their goal IIRC was going after facilitators. If the stories are true, what more valuable doping facilitators than those in the UCI itself? Lance is a done deal. Wada has spoken. They can appeal to CAS over witnesses, but that would be a very public affair.
python said:i agree, the likelihood of a usada-uci deal is a remote one.
but it does not mean the uci wont seek one or that some 3d parties wont attempt to broker one.
a lot depends on politics and, in my assessment, the strength and resolve of wada's support for usada. so far, there is no reason to believe that wada wavered.
another factor here is this - at the end of the day, usada is not chartered to change corrupt leadership of any international federation. it would be too ambitious of a goal for their $15 million dollar budget.
mewmewmew13 said:... as it wears on we will see more defiant and outlandish behavior from mr Armstrong...