del1962 said:
WHo are the bots, you do yourself no credit using that term, kindof like you prefer to denigrate those who don't take ypour point of view.
Note: using the term bots is a form of trolling
Fair enough.
Let me know if you have any thoughts on the substantive content of the post. I'm simply reacting to the "hypocrisy" whining that was going on. What really was going on was that a lot of folks, who also happen to be newer fans and can't read a bike race didn't seem to get that the cobbles are about a lot more than power, particularly in the rain. We got whining that "if Sky did that they would have been hammered on this forum for doping". Sure. However, Sky did not do that. Why? Because they don't have a bunch of riders who are good on the pave...except the guy they left off the team. A couple. But there is a fundamental difference to a team putting 3 guys on the front on a rainy, cobbled stage and a team that has been putting 5+ guys on the front over every col in France over the last couple of years. The former is about power and skill and tactics, the latter is simple power, and completely impossible clean. And no, I did not see one person say Astana are clean. I would have a laugh if anyone thinks they don't have a few guys at least on the sauce. However, that what they did on stage 5 was not strong evidence of doping. Whereas putting 5+ doms over the top on a dozen cols is strong evidence of doping.
The comparisons to Gewiss were absurd.
My goal in pointing it out is to have folks maybe learn a thing or two about reading a race. I guess I could be kinder about it. Maybe next time folks will be less quick to feel persecuted by criticism of Sky and not so quick on the trigger with absurd comparisons of situations which were in no way similar.
Be a fan of a team. Great. But watch the sport with your eyes open.