- Jan 11, 2010
- 15,616
- 4,551
- 28,180
Yes.profff said:is kruswijk confirmed in rabo squad?
No.will gesink be there?
Yes.profff said:is kruswijk confirmed in rabo squad?
No.will gesink be there?
Pretty usual, teams don't want to invest in riders that will leave the team anyway. Even more so when there's so much emphasis on WT points.maltiv said:Garmin are considering not to send Hushovd to the Vuelta, as a revenge for him leaving the team. Vaughters has been doing such all year with riders who were known to be leaving but to deny the world champion to ride the vuelta is pretty absurd.
theyoungest said:Yes.
No.
auscyclefan94 said:Gesink not doing the vuelta? Why not? What will he be doing for the rest of the season?
auscyclefan94 said:I am sorry but why is he doing the world championships? Seems a little pointless to me.
Yes, that would have been the logical thing to do. However, Gesink has a different opinion.auscyclefan94 said:who for??????? don't mean to be rude but it seems to me that he would of been better off to drop out of the tour early, rest up and build for la vuelta instead of riding for the netherlands in a race which they don't really have a real leader for or tbh a good chance in.
Ah, that's why he didn't ride the Worlds last yearDekker_Tifosi said:Gesink has some national pride ;-)
It is limited when he has to fly to Australia. Who can blame him?theyoungest said:Ah, that's why he didn't ride the Worlds last year
(a course which at least moderately would have suited him, unlike this year's)
icefire said:Mmmm... Are you following Cobo at Burgos?
ingsve said:Cobo did lose time in the TTT by not finishing with his team. Also I thought Menchov was also riding?
It might be regarded as ‘normal’ practice but I agree with Maltiv it is absurd in professional sport at this level. If Mr Stapleton wonders why sponsors are wary of committing to cycling, then look no further for one answer.theyoungest said:Pretty usual, teams don't want to invest in riders that will leave the team anyway. Even more so when there's so much emphasis on WT points.
It seems a perfectly reasonable business decision to me. It's investing in the riders from which you actually get to reap the results of the investment, and not in riders who will be your rivals next year. What's unprofessional about that?muscat said:It might be regarded as ‘normal’ practice but I agree with Maltiv it is absurd in professional sport at this level. If Mr Stapleton wonders why sponsors are wary of committing to cycling, then look no further for one answer.
I find it difficult to think of another sport who would consider leaving out the reigning WC who has just lead the team to their most successful results in the sports most prestigious event in a petulant fit of spite (Even in cycling I find it difficult to think of another professional team who would leave out the WC for the Vuelta after how he and the team performed in the Tdf! ) JV might not like it but who cares about Garmin -Cervelo Team without the publicity generated by Hushovd? Before considering leaving Hushovd out because he is looking elsewhere, what is or has JV done, pre or post the TdF if anything to try and keep him?
Unfortunately Garmin as a pro team will be able to compete Veulta without Hushovd, but I am sure both Vuelta organisers and UCI and sponsors will not be happy. So Mr Stapleton might want to answer this question. If it is considered ‘normal’ for the manager of a professional pro tour team to behave in such a vindictive and and unprofessional manner against a successful rider, what sponsor in their right mind would want to contribute to the sport?
theyoungest said:It seems a perfectly reasonable business decision to me. It's investing in the riders from which you actually get to reap the results of the investment, and not in riders who will be your rivals next year. What's unprofessional about that?
It happens in every team, every year. Now that it happens to the world champion, too bad, but what's the difference?
Well this thing about buying rider's points is just ridiculous and makes decisions like this almost acceptable. Imagine if Bjarne Riis refused to let the Schlecks ride the TDF and Astana refused to let Contador ride the TDF in 2010, just because they were leaving next year.theyoungest said:It seems a perfectly reasonable business decision to me. It's investing in the riders from which you actually get to reap the results of the investment, and not in riders who will be your rivals next year. What's unprofessional about that?
It happens in every team, every year. Now that it happens to the world champion, too bad, but what's the difference?
maltiv said:Well this thing about buying rider's points is just ridiculous and makes decisions like this almost acceptable. Imagine if Bjarne Riis refused to let the Schlecks ride the TDF and Astana refused to let Contador ride the TDF in 2010, just because they were leaving next year.
muscat said:Unfortunately Garmin as a pro team will be able to compete Vuelta without Hushovd, but I am sure both Vuelta organisers and UCI and sponsors will not be happy. So Mr Stapleton might want to answer this question. If it is considered ‘normal’ for the manager of a professional pro tour team to behave in such a vindictive and and unprofessional manner against a successful rider, what sponsor in their right mind would want to contribute to the sport?
theyoungest said:Pretty usual, teams don't want to invest in riders that will leave the team anyway. Even more so when there's so much emphasis on WT points.
