Website Errors.

Page 5 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
hrotha said:
Are pictures still inevitably attached to their original caption, no matter where they're used? Because that's a silly system.

Susan Westemeyer said:
Yes, they are, and yes, it is.

Susan

I've noticed this issue before too. It's something I've encountered a number of times in my work but I find that the utility of a fully-automated captioning system is greater than the risk of causing minor confusion by postdate referencing.

It might be worth adding to CN's editorial guidelines - as I have recommended in the past and as I've seen done elsewhere - that photo captions should not include anything that may someday make little sense outside of the original context. Sounds like a difficult rule but it's pretty simple in practice.

For example, "Geraint Thomas" is better (if a little less informative) than "Geraint Thomas (Sky)" (if he had later left Sky) or "Geraint Thomas looks pleased with his recent form" (if that was only relevant at the time the photo was taken).

Then if some notion of time must be included, better to expressly state it, for example: "Evans descends a big hill. Stage 15, 2011 Tour de France". Or "Geraint Thomas, 2010 British Champion". This latter caption wouldn't have looked odd in 2010 when it was current, nor would it have now. :)
 
Mar 10, 2009
6,158
1
0
CN Reader Poll Result...

Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a01a8'

Object required: 'objRS'

E:\INETPUB\WWWROOT\COMPETITION-ENGINE\READERPOLL2011\../asp_includes/adoFuncs.asp, line 358
 
Mar 26, 2009
2,532
1
0
This isnt Sohrabi but Mizbani.

dsc_0239_600.jpg
 
Jun 16, 2009
346
0
0
Tour of Wellington

The article on the Tour of Wellington has got it in the wrong part of the country.

It has been the Tour of Wellington for the last 24 years, but is now moving about 200km north to become the New Zealand Cycle Classic in the Manawatu.

Here's a link to the organiser's page so that you can get the necessary details to edit the article:
http://www.cycletournz.com/Default.aspx?alias=www.cycletournz.com/menstour

... and a report from the local media:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-sports/5868515/Manawatus-Tour-granted-international-status

:)
 
Jun 23, 2010
18
0
0
In the transfers guide, Medhi Sohorabi is ounder both AG2R and Quickstep. Also, Daryl Impey left RadioShack in 2010 and is not a loss for 2011.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
im thinking the photo caption doesnt really go too well with the article.
95nfkg.png

it has a certain Chris White about it.
 
Oct 1, 2010
320
0
0
A couple of things about the Bernard Hinault article (14 November):

1. The writer claims:

"Four years later, in 1978, Hinault won the French national championships before clinching a Tour/Vuelta double later in the season, all before his 24th birthday."

However, back in 1978, the Vuelta was held in April and May so the order of winning is actually:

Vuelta (April & May)
French Championship (June)
Tour (June & July)

2. The photo of Fignon and Hinault as teammates at the 1983 Tour really puzzles me. Hinault didn't ride that tour as he'd agravated his old knee injury while winning the Vuelta (again before the Tour). Did Hinault turn up towards the end of the Tour in full racing kit to pose for a photo with Fignon or was this photo taken at a post-Tour criterium where Fignon would be rightly entitled to show off his yellow jersey? I'm really interested to know where that photo was taken and the circumstances.
 
May 20, 2010
718
1
0
Today's article on Lance Armstrong and Grand Jury

Error no...misleading/ambiguous.

"As for the current public delay in proceedings, Stichel said that grand juries can often take months to make decisions and that although no new witnesses have been called, it does not mean more could be summoned in the future."

The remainder of article points to the possibility of no further witnesses. However the "although" indicates possibility of further witnesses and creates a sentence that appears self contradictory.

ciao js

ps please correct me via pm if I have got it all wrong
 
Mar 13, 2009
5,245
2
0
I believe the cyclingnews article is wrong to say Andy Schleck has been "banned for speeding". The prosecutor's office only appealed the first ruling to only fine him 350€. Today this appeal was dealt with in court but there was no ruling taken. It is a small detail since he is obviously guilty but still it's wrong because he has not (yet) received a ban. He might receive one if the judges decide to go with the prosecutor's appeal or he might not.

Here an article in German that might clarify:

http://www.wort.lu/wort/web/letzebu...60/fahrverbot-fuer-andy-schleck-gefordert.php

Note the German "gefordert" which translates into "asked for"