Re: Re:
hrotha said:
You're using a different definition of 'crack' (a nonstandard one, I'd wager; but I'm not sure). The way GuyIncognito used it, it doesn't mean "showed weakness and was dropped", it means "completely blew up".
Indurain cracked on Les Arcs. He blew up and was dropped by many riders who had no business dropping him.
Indurain didn't crack on Sestriere. Riis merely dropped him, but he still performed at the presumed level of a contender.
Those are three different things, IMHO. One is hitting the wall, completely blowing up, a la Cadel at Passo Coe. Another is getting dropped by a someone who is better on that day, say Quintana by Froome at LPSM or vice-versa at La Toussuire or Alpe d'Huez. Cracking, or having a jour sans, includes that first definition but is not limited to it. You crack if you have a bad day where several guys who aren't quite at your level ride away from your underperforming legs. If that's 50 guys, then you've blown up spectacularly, but if it's 10 guys, like Valverde at Risoul or Hautacam, then you still cracked. I'm sorry, but if you're in it to win it Laurens Ten Dam shouldn't be dropping you. You may not have shattered into a million pieces, but you've cracked. That's no dig on Laurens, he seems like a swell guy and is ten times the bike rider I'll ever be. But YMMV, as you've stated, people use words to mean different things. Latter-day Wittgenstein and all that. I wasn't particularly knocking Guy's definition, but I was amused by the rather diplomatic phrasing, which I will keep in my back pocket for the future.
BTW, I'm not sure Valverde is going to have a jour sans (I hope we can agree on that terminology) at this Giro. He was pretty good and pretty consistent at the Tour last year. But it wouldn't surprise me.