Dalakhani said:Or even 4 guys from different teams over 100km of varied terrain. Winner takes all.
How about: last 100km of stage 13 of this year's TdF.
4 man line-up:
Spartacus
Vino
Thor
Wiggo
Anyone fancy estimating the odds?
Steve
Dalakhani said:Or even 4 guys from different teams over 100km of varied terrain. Winner takes all.
flatclimb said:Cancellara would rip Cavs legs off. Honestly how is this a thread?
Dalakhani said:How about: last 100km of stage 13 of this year's TdF.
4 man line-up:
Spartacus
Vino
Thor
Wiggo
Anyone fancy estimating the odds?
Steve
Ferminal said:Yes it probably would, but I'd be willing to guess that Cancellara and any other strong one day rider would have a far greater ability to continually put in efforts than a specialist sprinter be that Cav, Greipel, Petacchi, Farrar or whoever. With respect to Farrar, he showed reasonable improvement this season in the early classics.
If these guys are so strong that they could follow Cancellara attacking and TTing for 200km, why aren't they following the big wheels in P-R?
forty four said:its clear you dont understand cycling and the various types of riders. cavendish is a pure sprinter he does not have endurance or the sustainable power like a world champ tt rider has. cancellara would crush him by many many many minutes. now in a 200 meter side by side cavendish would win 200 k absolutely no chance.
Winterfold said:This is inaccurate - Cav is also a national level pursuit and world champion Madison rider his average speeds on those distances are very impressive when you give him the 25% saving he gets from drafting Spartacus it is very different.
This is not a timetrial.
I still want to know how Cav gets dropped - I can see Cav drafting at 60 kmh for 5-10 KM can Canc do 60 kmh for longer?
Izzy eviel said:What if Cav had his TdF team with him? Would that make it a bit more interesting?
Fowsto Cope-E said:Because the cobbles give Cancellara an opportunity to break away or push the pace and drop them. In an pan-flat race, this wouldn't happen.
nobilis said:I think a more interesting discussion would have been, who would win on a short prologue (like 5kms or less)
Mambo95 said:The entire peloton can't stop Cavendish winning then, so I wouldn't hold out much hope for Cancellara on his own.
usedtobefast said:would they not be trading pulls at some point? i can't see one guy just sitting on and the other just pulling. tactics would be needed.
Ferminal said:Yes, exactly, because they aren't strong enough after 150km to hold his wheel on the cobbles - their one day endurance is far less.
Fowsto Cope-E said:Yes, but if in a pan-flat, no-cobbles race, Cancellara would not have an opportunity to drop Cav, especially if he is forced to do the work the entire time. In P-R, Cancellara has teammates pulling in order for him to save energy. If there was a pacer in this race, Cancellara would almost definitely win; however, in this case, Cancellara would most likely be forced to pull the entire thing.
Spartacus! He does a massive inital ITT, drops Cav, and just spends the rest of the day dangling in front of Cavendish, knowing that Cav cant sprint out with out the help of the peloton or team.onetofifteen said:in a 200km one-on-one road race on a totally flat motorway with no wind?
i don't think it would be quite so easy. Cav could not force Canc to pull. i know how to get someone to work and i am not a professional. mind games come in to play. they are men and you can do things on the road to achieve your goal, beyond physical ability.Fowsto Cope-E said:Cav has no reason to pull and would force Cancellara to do all the work. If Cancellara just wants to keep it easy for 200k, it wiuld go down to a sprint and Cav would win. So tacticly, Cav has a definite advantage over Cancellara
usedtobefast said:i don't think it would be quite so easy. Cav could not force Canc to pull. i know how to get someone to work and i am not a professional. mind games come in to play. they are men and you can do things on the road to achieve your goal, beyond physical ability.
Fowsto Cope-E said:But if Cav got up to the front, he would just sit up and save energy for the sprint. When there are no consequences to taking it easy, I don't think mind games would work very well. Once in a junior race, because all of my teammates had attacked leaving just two of us left in what used to the pack, I sat on this one kids whell the entire time. If he ever got me to get up to the front, I would just sit up. He would make an attack, and I would follow. Eventually, my teammate lapped us, and I pulled him to the finish
The Hitch said:At a junior level, does it feel rewarding to help a teammate win? is there the motivation?
+1slowtwitch said:there is a lack of fundamental understanding of the types of riders these guys are in this thread. people are claiming cav is great in 500m, 1k, 5k, and 10k efforts, or when shielded by a team of riders. Great. the difference between a 5k effort and a 10k effort is enormous, let alone the difference between a 10k effort and a 200k effort.
cav's legs are trained to burst once at full power. canc is designed to hold a certain speed for 5, 10, 40k. if you don't understand that difference in physiology, then you do not understand cycling or endurance sports in general.
someone claimed cav can hold his teammates' wheel for 5-10k at 60kmh, and that's wonderful. cancellara is not stupid enough to let cav ride 190k in his draft. canc will take it easy for 150k, ramp up speed until he gets cav off his wheel. The speed is not what drops cav, the muscular endurance is what drops him. once he is dropped, cav's legs will have lost the ability to clear lactic acid (the stuff that makes your legs burn) faster than his body produces it.
while the question is hypothetical, you need to argue based on scientific fact. how cav does over (relatively) short intense efforts has nothing to do with a 200k race, so why bring up useless facts.
robertocarlos said:+1
is like asking who would win a mile race between michael johnson vs usain bolt.