flatclimb said:
Yea seriously, if there was any competition between the two there would have been by now and we wouldn't be here debating it.
Cav's a one trick pony and it's known throughout the peleton, he knows it too.
He's useless besides sprinting and doesn't deserve any respect when he stops trying because he doesn't have a chance at winning anymore. Proves his mental strength is nothing and if they really did race I wouldn't be surprised if he pulled to the side of the road after 10km.
Almost all of the best riders are "one trick ponies" in modern cycling. Or sometimes "one and a half trick ponies". The era of the Merckx, Kelly, etc is over. Specialists rule the roost.
There is nothing inherently "shameful" about being a sprinter who can't climb or compete at a long time trial, any more that there's something "shameful" about being one of the miniature climbers who doubles his weight every time he puts his clothes on.
Cavendish is the fastest sprinter in the world. He's arguably the fastest sprinter there's ever been. I suspect that if you offered his palmares to other riders in exchange for their own at the same age, that there's less than half a dozen active guys who wouldn't bite your hand off. Contador... and well, then you start to run out pretty quickly. "Useless besides sprinting" is a worthless criticism to make of a professional sprinter. Usain Bolt isn't going to win any marathons, I doubt if that fact causes him sleepless nights.
I agree, by the way, that there would be no contest at all in the scenario as set up in the original post. There's simply no way that Cavendish could keep on Cancellara's wheel for that sort of distance. There just isn't enough of a slipstream from one rider, and particularly not from one rider who is trying to drop him. Make it 1k on the other hand and we have no contest in the other direction. Make it 10k and we actually have something to argue about.