The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Benotti69 said:where did he get the name 'Mellow Johnny's' ?..probably an inside joke referring to their PED habits.....
VeloCity said:Yes, but this is a cycling forum, where opinions, conjectures, and the like are expressed, shared, discussed, ridiculed, etc.
Publicus said:I was reading over Lance's deposition in the SCA case and I think the UCI and Lance are being a bit clever. There were in fact two payments. One made some years before 2005. And another made after he retired, the one for $100,000.
After talking about the $25M or so that he had previously donated "some years ago" (Armstrong can't recall the specifics), the questioning attorney asks:
(I typed this in from the transcript, couldn't copy and paste)
Now this was in 2005. So, I think this is a clear reference to the $100,000. So this raises the question, which should be directed to Pat McQuaid and Lance Armstrong, when was this money received and what did the UCI do with those funds?
Benotti69 said:McQuaid is only talking about 1 payment $100k not 2 payments of $125k, so how clever are they?
and McQuaid has said it was not wise to take the money, ie not clever....
this is gonna cost a lot in liars (re lawyers) to try and fight all this...lot of people in cycling who reputations are on the line, not just LA, Hog and named riders........i'd say hincapie can kiss his plans for a special sports village dreams goodbye...
eleven said:Indeed.
in both cases, the correct answer is "We don't know" and an opinion either way is simply conjecture.
<although, to be fair, I have my doubts about us being "about to find out".>
flicker said:Floyd/Kali the destroyer. I wanted to see Floyd/Hamilton in the ToC last year to see what they could accomplish, this year I could care less after Tyler was banished once again. Those two are a pair. Floyd/ the anti Armstrong forum posters are out of their gourds. The breaking of OMERTA needs to take place in baby steps. Obviously Floyd/Forum posters do not follow other major sports.
The bottom line is this, all sports need to clean up. If Floyd/Forum/LeMond/Walsh/Betsy/Cosy beehive/Joe Papp choose to focus on Postal/Discovery/Bruyneel/Armstrong/Contador that is fine and dandy. However the ramifications are these individuals will push American cycling sponsorships and American racers away.
The other more important problem is it will make it easier for the other major professional sports to finger point at Lance /Shack pro and amatuer cycling and
basically show our sport to be BS a harbinger of cheats. While the major sports cheat and cheating will most likely amplify.
If I were an intelligent kid after all this comes down I would never even ride my bike to school after what is coming up. The bike industry is going to take a major downfall in what will happen now in the next 2 years. We must stand up and applaud Walsh/Betsy/Cosy Beehive/Joe Papp/ Mr. LeMond and Floyd Landis. It will be up to you folks to resurect the carnage and destuction on global cycling which Floyd Landis has precipitated.
I think we in America will be set back in cycling 30 years.
I am sorry about Bahati. It will happen to all US cycling in the next 2 years.
Benotti69 said:McQuaid is only talking about 1 payment $100k not 2 payments of $125k, so how clever are they?
and McQuaid has said it was not wise to take the money, ie not clever....
this is gonna cost a lot in liars (re lawyers) to try and fight all this...lot of people in cycling who reputations are on the line, not just LA, Hog and named riders........i'd say hincapie can kiss his plans for a special sports village dreams goodbye...
Which, of course, raises the question of who's facts are "facts" and who's "facts" are "opinions".eleven said:yes, but claiming opinions as facts is not sharing opinions, it's claiming opinions as facts.
buckwheat said:Nice non sequiter! What the hell does having a great time riding your bike have to do with drug cheats at the top?
It's like not going swimming in the 70's after the E German women dominated.
Kids should stop playing football/soccer, and baseball because of Bonds?
Kids should stop running because of Ben Johnson, Marion Jones, and Griffith Joyner?
Way to shift blame and nice logic also.![]()
buckwheat said:Of course we know.
Whether it can be proven in a court of law is a different issue.
^and this is exactly the type of he-said, he-said comment that proves nothing. We can have suspicions, but claiming all of this as fact is pure conjecture - and the conjecture on this board is just as biased against the leaders of the sport as conjecture on other boards is biased for it...Only ostriches don't know though.
What was (unnamed rider err) JV saying about being one of the cool kids?
They were forced to dope. That is, if they wanted a job riding for Lance.
flicker said:Sorry bud. My kids are athletes. I point out the big dopers who have been busted in every sport. Kids on bikes will be teased and motorists will be running cyclists off the road if it all comes out in the open.
Like I said drug cheats across the board all sports. If Lance goes down watch how many bike shops close. Watch how many kids turn back to video games and Facebook than cycling and all sports. I take it you live in Siberia or Kazakastan or perhaps in Riccardo Ricos neighborhood?
Forget all that! The navy seals are penetrating the recesses of Spain and Italy right now.Polish said:Is it just me that thinks having the FDA handle this is kind of Wimpy?
Why not the Big Dogs over in the the DEA? (Drug Enforcement Administration)
![]()
Tubeless said:Original thread question was - is there a way Lance can dodge this bullet?
This is not a doping test matter, but a criminal investigation. We know FDA is the federal agency in charge. They have a credible, experienced agent named to hande the case. Is Novitsky sufficiently motivated? Nailing Lance would add another well-known case to his prosecutorial record - fame, not fortune is what typically what motivates these career-investigators.
There are many federal investigations that go nowhere, including some that have been leaked to press. Somtimes politicians interfere and try to pressure to shelve the investigation - with justifications such as relative priorities, conflicting investigations by other federal agencies or some such seemingly valid excuse. Does Lance have any friends in high-enough places? Senators, congressmen, administration officials, FDA management? Given the recent PR reaction, it could be a risky move by a politician to get involved - it would probably not stay confidential at this stage.
That leaves how much evidence Novitsky will be able to collect to first get an indictment and then the eventual conviction - and what laws he's targeting as having been broken. This may prove to be a laborous and time-consuming phase, but given the facts are not in dispute, should eventually be successful. A press piece discussed that statue of limitations is 5 years for certain applicable crimes - the fact that the investigation is proceeding would suggest that the investigation does not cover just the US Postal team time frame, but also that of the Discovery Channel team, which started in June 2004. Lance's last TdF victory is from July 2005 - just less than 5 years ago.
The only way out for Lance would probably be a distraction - a new event that's deemed a higher priority for FDA and this agent to focus its energies on at the moment. But even in that case, the likely outcome is that the case would be just delayed, not canceled.
MarkGreen0 said:Yeah I think it will just be a European sport again.
Where is cycling news based? Do you think it will close down?
flicker said:Sorry bud. My kids are athletes. I point out the big dopers who have been busted in every sport. Kids on bikes will be teased and motorists will be running cyclists off the road if it all comes out in the open.
Like I said drug cheats across the board all sports. If Lance goes down watch how many bike shops close. Watch how many kids turn back to video games and Facebook than cycling and all sports. I take it you live in Siberia or Kazakastan or perhaps in Riccardo Ricos neighborhood?
eleven said:1. When was Bonds clean?
2. You're making a rather large assumption that the facts in this case are at all analogous to the case against Bonds (who, by the way, is free to pursue a career in baseball)
I agree with much of your post, but this claim is simply not true - for two reasons.Colm.Murphy said:Don't get me wrong, I am not an anti-doping zealot, nor do I think the ADA's or the UCI are worth a peck. What is clear is that the USPS team, as Landis is exposing, practiced as US Govt funded program of doping. Serious laws were broken, and from it was built the Lance brand and the Livestrong anti-cancer ploy.
flicker said:I do not see cycling as a popular sport in the US in 2 years. I will tell my kids who the convicted drug cheats are in all the sports.
Since I live in the US I do not know how the British Cycling fans feel about drug cheats in cycling. I think Floyds admitions will turn fans and potential fans off the sport.
I would have prefered to keep our little American secret. That is just me though.
Colm.Murphy said:As the latest ESPN article keenly notes, if he has not just lied to the fans but also gave false hope to those stricken with cancer, then he is a modern day anti-christ. I am not overstating it, look it up.
Colm.Murphy said:So what?
Will it deter YOU from riding or racing? Will YOU instruct your kids to find a sport other than cycling?
If you are trying to imply that this affair should be glossed over so my local Trek dealer can keep me in fresh patch kits, then try again.
When Madoff happened, did they close the stock market? When the Mitchell Report came out, did fans cancel their season tickets?
I think you are stating intentionally dense and obtuse positions because your false God is going to be defrocked.
Don't get me wrong, I am not an anti-doping zealot, nor do I think the ADA's or the UCI are worth a peck. What is clear is that the USPS team, as Landis is exposing, practiced as US Govt funded program of doping. Serious laws were broken, and from it was built the Lance brand and the Livestrong anti-cancer ploy.
As the latest ESPN article keenly notes, if he has not just lied to the fans but also gave false hope to those stricken with cancer, then he is a modern day anti-christ. I am not overstating it, look it up.
Overreact much? Even if the biggest name in American cycling goes down, it'll be next to nothing to the American audience, compared to a McGwire or a Bonds or a Woods or any other big-name baseball or football player going down. Most people in the US probably still have no idea who Armstrong is beyond "that biking guy?". Besides, do you really think most American's who do have even the faintest idea of who is don't already suspect that he was doping? You really think, after Bonds and Canseco and McGwire etc, that they're going to be shocked and dismayed to learn that the top guy in a sport with perhaps the dirtiest reputation in the world was doping? I have no doubt that many will be disappointed to have it confirmed, but I seriously doubt very many Americans will be in the least bit surprised.flicker said:Sorry bud. My kids are athletes. I point out the big dopers who have been busted in every sport. Kids on bikes will be teased and motorists will be running cyclists off the road if it all comes out in the open.
Like I said drug cheats across the board all sports. If Lance goes down watch how many bike shops close. Watch how many kids turn back to video games and Facebook than cycling and all sports. I take it you live in Siberia or Kazakastan or perhaps in Riccardo Ricos neighborhood?
eleven said:I agree with much of your post, but this claim is simply not true - for two reasons.
1. The USPS does not receive federal moneys. It is, at best, a GSE ala Freddie or Fannie before they were taken into receivership. Furthermore....
2. People riding for a team sponsored by a GSE are not federal employees. They are (were) employees of Capital Sports and Entertainment / Tailwind.