- Apr 30, 2011
- 47,186
- 29,831
- 28,180
Where riders train is up to them, mostly. I rarely hear of training accidents on Teide.Are you claiming that training isn't part of the job?
Where riders train is up to them, mostly. I rarely hear of training accidents on Teide.Are you claiming that training isn't part of the job?
Col de Lein has 1km of gravel on top. Just the gimmick the "modern" giro is so fond of ....!If they had reasons to believe that not even the tunnel could be raced, they could have prepared an alternative stage that started in Martigny and climbed either Planches or Lein first.
Maybe the threat of avalanches with the ground already soaked...................Also find it a big coincident that during that extreme downpour on stage 10 nobody protested but much more moderate rain is too much
Let's return to my original point about the level of contempt for riders that many cycling fans have. What level would you say you're at? Based on this thread I'm putting it at extreme.Training is unsafe, cancelling races is the solution
Does every rider get their own car? Or does each team have to fit in a single car like a clown car?why not a new sport
Riders ride up every climb but race down the other side in a car with the bike on the roof
Well, considering that the riders thought "Second descent is dangerous, let's cancel first one" it is reasonableTraining is unsafe, cancelling races is the solution
Contempt for some, admiration for others. Geez, I don't treat all members of a group as a blob.Let's return to my original point about the level of contempt for riders that many cycling fans have. What level would you say you're at? Based on this thread I'm putting it at extreme.
What percentage of the pro peloton (including those below WT level and riders on other continents) would you say can afford to train there? I know facts are irrelevant and you're incapable of being anything other than disingenuous.Where riders train is up to them, mostly. I rarely hear of training accidents on Teide.
Why would that be I wonderthe level of contempt for riders that many cycling fans have.
Everyone can afford a stationary bike.What percentage of the pro peloton (including those below WT level and riders on other continents) would you say can afford to train there? I know facts are irrelevant and you're incapable of being anything other than disingenuous.
I have contempt for Vegni, not the riders to be honest.Let's return to my original point about the level of contempt for riders that many cycling fans have. What level would you say you're at? Based on this thread I'm putting it at extreme.
The helicopter was offered to all teams, but they had to pay for it. Two other team used it, one was Barhain, the other one i dont'remember. Now i do not know if SQS had maybe a discount or if it was totally free for them, or if they had to pay full price.
So how is their private economy a public concern? Are you unable to stick to the subject?Even by your low standards the level of trolling is slipping.
Or they ride up the climb and carry their bikes on their shoulders on the descent. Like reversed cyclocrosswhy not a new sport
Riders ride up every climb but race down the other side in a car with the bike on the roof
Who is trolling here is really a matter of perspective........Even by your low standards the level of trolling is slipping.
No they won't.
Cut 40k of any of stages ridden so far this week and nothing would change.
Yeah it's stupid. Croix de coeur is far more dangerous than GSB and now there will be much bigger groups racing faster there as you say.Don't see how this makes the stage any safer looking at the profile?
There's going to be a much bigger group absolutely bombing that wet descent now.
"Of course". Let's see the data backing that statementMy post specifically refers to flat stages - Of course on average an 180km stage is ridden harder than a 220km flat stage.
"According to the regulations, which outline freezing rain as point 1 and extreme temperatures as point 4 during certain parts of today's route"
