The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Reading Gadsen's post makes me think we should end the world today - Their thoughts seem to be out of touch with reality - And if we follow their thoughts through logically there is no NEED for schools at all - You can home school without paying school fees.
The point here is you can take death rate of all Countries with a grain of salt.
As of the week of May 31, fewer than one-third of the weekly coronavirus cases were from nursing homes in Sunbelt states. But by the week starting July 26, that share was 78%.
“The reality is that (a) facility’s infection control practices is the number one factor leading to the spread of COVID within these facilities,”
I have been reading a lot of questionable logic about the ~35- 50% or so people who might have pre-existing cross reactive T cells from prior coronavirus infections. Even some doctors are speculating that this means herd immunity would be 20% infection. That is highly doubtful. Even one of the authors who discovered this cross reactivity has poured cold water on the idea. That does not mean that T cells are unimportant.
View: https://mobile.twitter.com/profshanecrotty/status/1293346645560582144
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=f9B3nMCtDCg
In case you were wondering why our boat is on the rocks
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vpFV0WCrRT4
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_VVcM5IPUCc
These are all official messages given by the President of the United States
All should remember that if the original claims by the U.S. Government officials were even partially true things would be significantly different. There was no testing,there still is no testing. We don't know who is infected,we don't know who is not. We are still essentially blind. Dr.Scott Gottlieb a common TV and radio contributor,estimated from data collected that less than 9% of the population has been exposed so far in the US.
You can still compare countries with similar testing capabilities.The point here is you can take death rate of all Countries with a grain of salt. China at 3 per million is laughable. Or we could look at Cuba. 3,300 cases and 8 deaths per million. Palestine, 22 deaths per million. Costa Rica? 60 per million right next door to Panama at 414 per million. Then there's Peru at 802 per million and neighbors Bolivia and Ecuador in the mid-300's.
Brazil, 511, Chile, 549, Argentina, 130 and Uraguay..... 12.
This all sounds very legitimate. No really.
You left out the Idaho Sheriff who also proved that having an IQ over 80 isn't necessary to hold his job.View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4L9fJBCKO7Q
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QRcVqVA8_Y8
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MZNChm1XvQw
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e127t6Ry-oE
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxibV8Hld0
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yLfl9pHQTzI
There are just so many government actors that without a coordinator this was assured to happen. There are hundreds and hundreds of these examples nationwide from just police..
When we started this new way of life,years ago,disregarding laws and courts, it was terrible,but even then all this anarchy was manageable, but when law enforcement makes up their own laws on the fly and done void of logic and facts, we arrive here..
173,979 dead and families and friends,communities suffering.
All 200+ countries? Really? Everyone is lying, so the U.S., which is telling the truth, is doing better than all of them?
What really depresses me about your attitude is that you don't seem to understand that painting the best possible picture of the U.S. response is not in America's interest. It's one thing to try to find some reason for optimism, another to be totally unrealistic.
If you want to improve anything, you should always be your harshest critic.
This:“Can we safely have two teams meet on the field? I would say yes,” Wolfe told The Daily. “Will it be tough? Yes. Will it be expensive and hard and lots of work? For sure. But I do believe you can sufficiently mitigate the risk of bringing COVID onto the football field or into the training room at a level that’s no different than living as a student on campus.”
IMO, the universities won't meet the standard that Wolf is referring to so no, games can't be played safely.
165,000 people have never died from the flu in seven months. The long term neurological, cardiac, endocrine issues that are emerging with C19 have already surpassed the type of example that you shared.
It bears repeating that the official COVID-19 statistics are wrong for every country in the world whether intentional or not. But all-cause mortality figures are more difficult to dispute. And by that measure, the death toll in the USA is already over 200,000. Not every death is classified correctly as there are some legitimately difficult cases for older people who are generally not the picture of health before the virus. But that also holds true for flu. The 60,000 per year number thrown about is an estimate and a much higher figure than the number of people who actually test positive for flu and die. You should either trust the epidemiology for both or neither.
Interesting article. They will build statues to this doctor in the south if they finish the season. I am guessing he made a more persuasive argument in person, because he basically is saying in this article that we don't know if the heart data translates to younger athletes, so let's play anyway and find out?This:
How a doctor may have saved the college football season
A leading genetic cardiologist could be the reason we have college football this fall.www.google.com
Micheal Ackerman M.D. Ph.D
Mayo Clinic Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory.
"Michael Ackerman isn’t a college football fan."
"The Mayo Clinic genetic cardiologist has been to two college football games in his life."
"But if we have college football this fall, Dr. Ackerman will be one of the reasons why. His perspective on myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart, helped the Big 12 hold off on canceling its season, which would have set off a string of dominos that could have doomed college football last week. Without the Big 12, the ACC would have likely dropped out, and it would have been increasingly difficult for the SEC to move forward alone. The fate of the 2020 season hinged on the biggest wild card of the Power 5 conferences."
"The Minnesota-based cardiologist leads the Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Lab which studies, among other things, sudden death in young athletes. He explained to the Big 12′s leaders that a new myocarditis study in the Journal of American Medical Association that sparked panic across college sports didn’t have the “bandwidth” to be transferable in a useful way. The study, conducted in Germany and composed of middle-aged adults, found that 78 percent of the 100 participants had some cardiac abnormality. Ackerman said it’d be a “scientific foul” to infer that those findings are relevant for 18 to 24-year old athletes.
"You cannot make that leap," Ackerman exclaimed."
"He used a soup analogy to explain how to weigh myocarditis, among other COVID-19 related issues, in whether to play football this fall. The conferences that canceled their seasons, he explained, stirred myocarditis in as a primary ingredient into their soup and then declared the soup tasted bad. Ackerman advised the Big 12 and Conference USA leaders to take myocarditis out of that equation, and if they still felt like the soup tasted bad, then that was their reason to cancel."
I'd say follow the science over politics.