I am not one of your 'usual suspects' and the moral standpoint on what Guidi did and whether he has duly paid for it is, with regard to hiring policy, immaterial.GJB123 said:Oil for drugs was 2003. But I guess in your book once a thief is always a thief. That seems to be the prevailing thought with the usual suspects in the Clinic.
What I am suggesting is that, in my opinion, Guidi's particular history makes him a different sort of hire to those who have admitted and cooperated. As far as we are aware, Guidi has done neither. If he has since done so, then all the better, but for the moment that is what makes him different to others among G-C's roster: he has a known history but he is not 'out' about it.